Clinical Study of Modified Devine's Surgical Technique in the Treatment of Concealed Penis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to observe the clinical effect of modified Devine's surgical technique in the treatment of concealed penis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2015 to September 2020, fifty-six children with concealed penis were treated with modified Devine's technique. Recorded the penile length and the satisfaction score preoperatively and postoperatively to confirm the effect of the surgery. Followed up the penis for bleeding, infection and edema one week and four weeks after the operation. Twelve weeks after the operation, we measured the length of the penis and observed whether there was a retraction. RESULTS: The length of the penis has been effectively lengthened(P < 0.001). There was significant improvement in parents' satisfaction grades (P < 0.001). All the patients had different degrees of penile edema after the operation. Most of the penile edema subsided about four weeks after the operation. No other complications occurred. No obvious penile retraction was found twelve weeks postoperative. CONCLUSION: The modified Devine's technique was safe and effective. As a treatment for concealed penis, it is worthy of wide clinical application.

A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Modified Circumcision and Two Other Types of Circumcision.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of three methods of circumcision: modified circumcision, traditional circumcision, and disposable suturing device circumcision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patients (n = 241) with redundant prepuce and/or phimosis were included in a clinical trial from January 2019 to March 2020. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the surgical method: group A, traditional circumcision (n = 79); group B, modified circumcision (n = 80); and group C, disposable suturing device circumcision (n = 82). RESULTS: The operation times in groups A, B, and C were 25.2 ± 3.3 min, 10.2 ± 2.7 min, and 6.7 ± 1.4 min, respectively. The volumes of intraoperative blood loss in groups A, B, and C were 12.7 ± 2.3 mL, 8.1 ± 3.4 mL, and 2.2 ± 0.8 mL, respectively (P < 0.05). Groups A and B were superior to group C in terms of the 6-h postoperative visual analog scale score and appearance satisfaction (P < 0.05). There were no obvious differences in the 7-day postoperative pain score and total healing time (P > 0.05). The operating expenses in groups A and B were lower than that in group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Modified circumcision, with its advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss and pain, lower cost, and better postoperative penile appearance, is easily accepted by patients and deserves wide clinical application.