Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 51(5): 20210291, 2022 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35230866

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and intraoral ultrasound (US) to determine the depth of invasion (DOI) and/or tumor thickness (TT) in oral cavity cancers, with histopathological evaluation as the gold standard. METHODS: Articles whose primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of MRI, CT, and US imaging to assess DOI and/or TT were searched in six major electronic databases, in addition to three grey literature databases. The methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated by using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent qualitative analysis: six studies on MRI, three on US, and one on CT. The accuracy values for MRI ranged from 67 to 83%, with sensitivity values above 80% and specificity above 75%. For US, mean values of sensitivity ranged from 91 to 93%. For CT, accuracy was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: For the application of US, CT, MRI, good accuracy was reported in DOI and/or TT, as evaluated in the preoperative period. US offered advantages for detection of small lesions.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...