Neoadjuvant Platinum-Based chemotherapy and lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: an international, Multi-Institutional, Real-World study.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advance penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), for which current evidence is lacking. METHODS: Included patients had locally advanced PSCC with clinical lymph node metastasis treated with at least one dose of NAC prior to planned consolidative lymphadenectomy. Objective response rates (ORR) were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. RESULTS: 209 patients received NAC for locally advanced and clinically node-positive PSCC.The study population consisted of 7% of patients with stage II disease, 48% with stage III, and 45% with stage IV. Grade 2 TrAEs occurred in 35 (17%) patients, and no treatment related mortality was observed. 201 (97%) completed planned consolidative lymphadenectomy. During follow up, 106 (52.7%) patients expired, with a median OS of 37.0 months (95% CI 23.8-50.1), and median PFS of 26.0 months (95% CI 11.7-40.2). ORR was 57.2%, with 87 (43.2%) having partial response and 28 (13.9%) having a complete response. Patients with objective response to NAC had a longer median OS (73.0 vs 17.0 months, p < .01) compared to those who did not. The lymph-node pathologic complete response rate (ypN0) was 24.8% in the cohort. CONCLUSION: NAC with lymphadenectomy for locally advanced PSCC is well tolerated and active to reduce the disease burden and improve long term survival outcomes.

Gender-based Disparity Exists in the Surgical Experience of Female and Male Urology Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a discrepancy exists in the number and type of cases logged between female and male urology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACGME case log data from 13 urology residency programs was collected from 2007 to 2020. The number and type of cases for each resident were recorded and correlated with resident gender and year of graduation. The median, 25th and 75th percentiles number of cases were calculated by gender, and then compared between female and male residents using Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: A total of 473 residents were included in the study, 100 (21%) were female. Female residents completed significantly fewer cases, 2174, compared to male residents, 2273 (P = .038). Analysis by case type revealed male residents completed significantly more general urology (526 vs 571, P = .011) and oncology cases (261 vs 280, P = .026). Additionally, female residents had a 1.3-fold increased odds of logging a case in the assistant role than male residents (95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.34, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Gender-based disparity exists within the urology training of female and male residents. Male residents logged nearly 100 more cases than female residents over 4years, with significant differences in certain case subtypes and resident roles. The ACGME works to provide an equal training environment for all residents. Addressing this finding within individual training programs is critical.

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: selection criteria, guidelines, and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) has been widely adopted for the management of men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, there is still a lack of consensus surrounding the optimal approach for monitoring men in AS protocols. While conservative management aims to reduce the burden of invasive testing without compromising oncological safety, inadequate assessment can result in misclassification and unintended over- or undertreatment, leading to increased patient morbidity, cost, and undue risk. No universally accepted AS protocol exists, although numerous strategies have been developed in an attempt to optimize the management of clinically localized disease. Variability in selection criteria, reclassification, triggers for definitive treatment, and follow-up exists between guidelines and institutions for AS. In this review, we summarize the landscape of AS by providing an overview of the existing AS protocols, guidelines, and their published outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search was performed to identify representative studies and guidelines pertaining to AS selection criteria and outcomes. CONCLUSION: While AS is a safe and increasingly utilized treatment modality for lower-risk forms of PCa, ongoing research is needed to optimize patient selection as well as surveillance protocols along with improved implementation across practices. Further, assessment of companion risk assessment tools, such as mpMRI and tissue-based biomarkers, is also needed and will require rigorous prospective study.

The LEGO™ Exercise: An Assessment of Core Competencies in Urology Residency Interviews.

BACKGROUND: In competitive residency specialties such as Urology, it has become increasingly challenging to differentiate similarly qualified applicants. Residency interviews are utilized to rank applicants, yet they are often biased and do not explicitly address ACGME core competencies. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized a team-based exercise in the urology residency interview centered on building LEGOs assesses core competences. DESIGN: From 2014-2017, students interviewing for urology residency at two institutions participated in a LEGO™ building activity. Applicants were assigned to "architect"- describing how to construct a structure - or "builder" - constructing the same structure with pieces-using only verbal cues to assemble the structure. Participants were graded using a rubric assessing competencies of interpersonal communication, problem-based learning, professionalism, and manual dexterity (indicator of procedural skill). The total minimum score was 16 and maximum was 80. SETTING: The study took place at two tertiary referral centers: University of Michigan Medical School in Ann Arbor, MI, and University of Utah School of Medicine in Salt Lake City, UT. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 176 applicants participated, comprised of applicants interviewing for urology residency at two institutions during the study timeframe. RESULTS: For architects and builders, there was a maximum score of 80, and minimum of 34 and 32, respectively. Both distributions show a right shift with mean scores of 64.3 and 65.9, and median scores of 69 and 65.5. Successful pairs excelled with consistent nomenclature and clear directionality. Ineffective pairs miscommunicated with false affirmations, inconsistent nomenclature, and lack of patience. CONCLUSIONS: The LEGO™ exercise allowed for standardized assessment of applicants based on ACGME core competencies. The rubric identified poor performers who do not rise to the challenge of a team-based task.

Urology Workforce Changes and Implications for Prostate Cancer Care Among Medicare Enrollees.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize national trends in urologist workforce, practice organization, and management of incident prostate cancer. METHODS: Using Medicare claims data from 2010 to 2016, we identified all urologists billing Medicare and the practice with which they were affiliated. We characterized groups as solo, small single specialty, large single specialty, multispecialty, specialist, or hospital-owned practices. Using a 20% sample of national Medicare claims, we identified all patients with incident prostate cancer and identified their primary treatment. RESULTS: The number of urologists increased from 9,305 in 2010 to 9,570 in 2016 (P = .03), while the number of practices decreased from 3,588 to 2,861 (P < .001). The proportion of urologists in multispecialty groups increased from 17.1% in 2010 to 28.2% in 2016, while those within solo practices declined from 26.2% to only 15.8% over the same time period. A higher proportion of patients at hospital-owned practices were treated with observation (P < .001) and surgery (P < .001), while a higher proportion of patients at large single specialty practices were treated with radiation therapy (P < .001). CONCLUSION: We characterized shifts in urologist membership from smaller, independent groups to larger, multispecialty or hospital-owned practices. This trend coincides with higher utilization of observation and surgical treatment for prostate cancer.

Is There a Urologist in the House? Trends in the Management of Consults Based on Shift, Location and Resident Organization.

INTRODUCTION: Consultations represent a significant workload for inpatient urology providers, yet consult patterns are poorly described. We report trends in billable urology consult activity by location, time and organization of consult residents at a single institution. METHODS: Using a secure database urology consults between 2011 and 2018 at an academic center were recorded. Consult time, location and management were documented. Consults were considered eligible for billing if seen by faculty at time of consult in the emergency room or within 24 hours in the inpatient or operating room settings. Furthermore, in 2016 consult responsibilities overnight were given to an in-house resident. An interrupted time series was used to evaluate trends in consultations. RESULTS: Ultimately 18,431 consults were seen, 40.8% in the inpatient setting and 55.2% in the emergency room setting. The overall number of consults increased annually. The majority of consults (64.8%) were made during the day. Around 88.7% of inpatient and 88.2% of operating room consults were eligible for billing, yet only half (54.43%) of emergency room consults were eligible. After the addition of an in-house consult resident there was a significant (12%) increase in the number of billable consults. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, nearly half of emergency room consults were not eligible for billing. Initiation of an in-house overnight consult resident significantly increased the fraction of total billable consults. Understanding patterns in consult data offers insight into quality improvement measures that maximize departmental labor efficiency.

Impact of Clinical Guidelines on Voiding Cystourethrogram Use and Vesicoureteral Reflux Incidence.

PURPOSE: To prevent over diagnosis and overtreatment of vesicoureteral reflux the 2007 NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) and 2011 AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) guidelines recommended against routine voiding cystourethrograms in children presenting with first febrile urinary tract infections. The impact of these guidelines on clinical practice is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an administrative claims database (Clinformatics™ Data Mart) children who underwent voiding cystourethrogram studies or had a diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux between 2001 and 2015 were identified. The cohort was divided into children age 0 to 2 and 3 to 10 years. Single and multiple group interrupted time series analyses (difference-in-difference) were performed with the guidelines as intervention points. The incidence of vesicoureteral reflux was compared across each period. RESULTS: Of the 51,649 children who underwent voiding cystourethrograms 19,422 (38%) were diagnosed with vesicoureteral reflux. In children 0 to 2 years old voiding cystourethrogram use did not decrease after the 2007 NICE guidelines were announced (-0.37, 95% CI -1.50 to 0.77, p = 0.52) but did decrease significantly after the 2011 AAP guidelines were announced (-2.00, 95% CI -3.35 to -0.65, p = 0.004). Among children 3 to 10 years old voiding cystourethrogram use decreased during the entire study period. There was a decrease in the incidence of vesicoureteral reflux in both groups that mirrored patterns of voiding cystourethrogram use. CONCLUSIONS: The 2011 AAP guidelines led to a concurrent decrease in voiding cystourethrogram use and incidence of vesicoureteral reflux among children 0 to 2 years old. Further studies are needed to assess the risks and benefits of reducing the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in young children.