Two-year post-distraction cartilage-related structural improvement is accompanied by increased serum full-length SIRT1.

BACKGROUND: Previously, fragments from Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) were identified in preclinical and clinical samples to display an increase in serum levels for N-terminal (NT) SIRT1 vs. C-terminal (CT) SIRT1, indicative of early signs of OA. Here we tested NT/CT SIRT1 levels as well as a novel formulated sandwich assay to simultaneously detect both domains of SIRT1 in a manner that may inform us about the levels of full-length SIRT1 in the circulation (flSIRT1) of clinical cohorts undergoing knee joint distraction (KJD). METHODS: We employed an indirect ELISA assay to test NT- and CT-SIRT1 levels and calculated their ratio. Further, to test flSIRT1 we utilized novel antibodies (Ab), which were validated for site specificity and used in a sandwich ELISA method, wherein the CT-reactive served as capture Ab, and its NT-reactive served as primary detection Ab. This method was employed in human serum samples derived from a two-year longitudinal study of KJD patients. Two-year clinical and structural outcomes were correlated with serum levels of flSIRT1 compared to baseline. RESULTS: Assessing the cohort, exhibited a significant increase of NT/CT SIRT1 serum levels with increased osteophytes and PIIANP/CTX-II at baseline, while a contradictory increase in NT/CT SIRT1 was associated with less denuded bone, post-KJD. On the other hand, flSIRT1 exhibited an upward trend in serum level, accompanied by reduced denuded bone for 2-year adjusted values. Moreover, 2 year-adjusted flSIRT1 levels displayed a steeper linear regression for cartilage and bone-related structural improvement than those observed for NT/CT SIRT1. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support that increased flSIRT1 serum levels are a potential molecular endotype for cartilage-related structural improvement post-KJD, while NT/CT SIRT1 appears to correlate with osteophyte and PIIANP/CTX-II reduction at baseline, to potentially indicate baseline OA severity.

Diverse Response to Local Pharmacological Blockade of Sirt1 Cleavage in Age-Induced versus Trauma-Induced Osteoarthritis Female Mice.

Objective: Previous studies have shown that the cleavage of Sirt1 contributes to the development of osteoarthritis (OA). In fact, OA was effectively abrogated by the intra-articular (IA) administration of two compounds, one blocking Sirt1 cleavage (CA074me) and the other activating Sirt1 (SRT1720), using a post-traumatically induced model (PTOA) in young female mice. In this study, we attempted to understand if this local treatment is effective in preventing age-associated OA (AOA) progression and symptoms. Design: A group of 17-month-old female C57BL/6J mice were IA administered with CA074me and/or SRT1720 or their combination. Joint histopathological analysis and bone histomorphometry were carried out, with an assessment of knee mechanical hyperalgesia. A serum analysis for NT/CT Sirt1 was carried out along with immunohistochemistry for articular cartilage to detect p16INK4A or γH2A.X. Similarly, meniscal cartilage was monitored for Lef1 and Col1a1 deposition. The data were compared for young female mice subjected to post-traumatic OA (PTOA). Results: Similar to PTOA, combination-treated AOA exhibited improved knee hyperalgesia, yet structural improvements were undetected, corresponding to unchanged NT/CT Sirt1 serum levels. Both AOA and PTOA exhibited unchanged staining for nuclear p16INK4A or γH2A.X and lacked a correlation with OA severity. Contrarily to PTOA, the combination treatment with AOA did not exhibit a local reduction in the Lef1 and Col1 targets. Conclusions: When targeting Sirt1 cleavage, the PTOA and AOA models exhibited a similar pain response to the combination treatment; however, they displayed diverse structural outcomes for joint-related damage, related to Lef1-dependent signaling. Interestingly, nuclear p16INK4A was unaffected in both models, regardless of the treatment's effectiveness. Finally, these findings highlight the variations in the responses between two highly researched OA preclinical models, reflecting OA pathophysiology heterogeneity and variations in gender-related drug-response mechanisms.