[MELALIB 15: A retrospective observational study of 383 cases of melanoma diagnosed by dermatologists in private practice]. / MELALIB15 : étude observationnelle rétrospective de 383 mélanomes dépistés par des dermatologues libéraux.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of melanoma constitutes a major challenge and is a common reason for dermatological consultations. There is no recent data on melanomas diagnosed in the private medical sector in France, nor on the circumstances of diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study on records collating data on all new consecutive cases of melanoma diagnosed between January 2015 and June 2018, in the private sector only, by volunteer dermatologists belonging to the association for continuing medical education, "Dermatologie Paris XV". A data collection sheet was prepared on which to record information about the dermatologist, the patient, the main complaint, the characteristics of the melanoma, and the initial treatment given, using the computerized list provided by our dermatopathology offices. RESULTS: The study involved 383 cases of melanoma, 37% in situ and 63% invasive, which consisted chiefly of superficial spreading melanoma. The median age of the cohort was 61 years and patients were predominantly female (58%). Follow-up of high-risk patients and complete routine examination (in those consulting for another reason) resulted in direct detection by a dermatologist of 202 of the 383 melanomas (52.7%); these melanomas had a lower median Breslow index than the rest of the cohort and were thin in the main. When patients consulted for a suspect lesion (139 cases), the lesion had been identified mostly by either the patient or by a relative (61% of cases). The decision to consult was made chiefly by the patients themselves, and the Breslow index was thicker. An initial consultation for nevus screening resulted in diagnosis of 42 melanomas, i.e. only 11% of the cohort. Dermoscopy was performed by 92% of the dermatologists participating in the study. Melanoma excision was performed in the office by the practitioner in 75% of cases, and management was validated at multidisciplinary meetings in 65% of cases. CONCLUSION: In terms of French primary care, dermatologists in private practice play a key role in ensuring early detection and initial management of melanoma.

Most chilblains observed during the COVID-19 outbreak occur in patients who are negative for COVID-19 on polymerase chain reaction and serology testing.

BACKGROUND: Acral lesions, mainly chilblains, are the most frequently reported cutaneous lesions associated with COVID-19. In more than 80% of patients tested, nasopharyngeal swabs were negative on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 when performed, and serology was generally not performed. METHODS: A national survey was launched on 30 March 2020 by the French Society of Dermatology asking physicians to report cases of skin manifestations in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 by using a standardized questionnaire. We report the results for acral manifestations. RESULTS: We collected 311 cases of acral manifestations [58.5% women, median age 25.7 years (range 18-39)]. The most frequent clinical presentation (65%) was typical chilblains. In total, 93 cases (30%) showed clinical suspicion of COVID-19, 67 (22%) had only less specific infectious symptoms and 151 (49%) had no clinical signs preceding or during the course of acral lesions. Histology of skin biopsies was consistent with chilblains. Overall, 12 patients showed significant immunological abnormalities. Of the 150 (48%) patients who were tested, 10 patients were positive. Seven of 121 (6%) RT-PCR-tested patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and five of 75 (7%) serology-tested patients had IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2. Tested/untested patients or those with/without confirmed COVID-19 did not differ in age, sex, history or acral lesion clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey do not rule out that SARS-CoV-2 could be directly responsible for some cases of chilblains, but we found no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the large majority of patients with acral lesions during the COVID-19 lockdown period in France. What is already known about this topic? About 1000 cases of acral lesions, mainly chilblains, were reported during the COVID-19 outbreak. Chilblains were reported to occur in young people within 2 weeks of infectious signs, which were mild when present. Most cases did not have COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and few serology results were available. What does this study add? Among 311 patients with acral lesions, mainly chilblains, during the COVID-19 lockdown period in France, the majority of patients tested had no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, 70 of 75 patients were seronegative for SARS-Cov-2 serology and 114 of 121 patients were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.

[Mycobacterial bovis BCG cutaneous infections following mesotherapy: 2 cases]. / BCGite cutanée après mésothérapie: 2 cas.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications following mesotherapy are usually due to ordinary bacteria or atypical mycobacteria. We report two new cases of mycobacterial bovis BCG infections following mesotherapy. To our knowledge only one case has already been reported. CASES REPORTS: A 52 year-old woman developed vaccinal MERIEUX BCG cutaneous abscesses following mesotherapy. Identification was made by a novel class of repeated sequences: Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. Despite prolonged anti-tuberculous therapy, complete remission was not obtained and surgical excision was performed. The second case was a 49 year-old man who developed a mycobacterial bovis BCG cutaneous abscess (Connaught) after mesotherapy, the regression of which was obtained with anti-tuberculous therapy. DISCUSSION: The severity of these two mycobacterial infections following mesotherapy illustrate the potential risks of mesotherapy. Identification is possible by molecular biology techniques (PCR and sequencing). The origin of this infection is unclear and therapeutic decision is difficult. Some authors recommend anti-tuberculous therapy but surgical excision may be necessary as in our cases.