Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 34(3): 206-14, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19587617

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is a challenging condition characterized by limited treatment options. Recently, numerous studies have reported excellent intermediate-term outcomes after lateral-branch radiofrequency (RF) denervation, but these studies are characterized by wide variability in technique, selection criteria, and patient characteristics. The purpose of this study was to determine whether any demographic or clinical variables can be used to predict SI joint RF denervation outcome. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with refractory, injection-confirmed SI joint pain underwent SI joint denervation at 2 academic institutions. A composite binary variable "successful" outcome was predefined as greater than 50% reduction in pain lasting at least 6 months coupled with a positive global perceived effect. Secondary outcome measures included Oswestry Disability Index scores, medication reduction, and retention on active duty for soldiers. Factors retrospectively evaluated for their association with outcome included demographic variables, duration of pain, opioid usage, pain referral pattern, physical examination signs, number of blocks and percentage of pain relief after SI joint injection, prognostic lateral-branch blocks, previous surgery, levels lesioned, RF technique, disability status, and coexisting medical conditions. RESULTS: Forty patients (52%) obtained a positive outcome. In multivariate analysis, preprocedure pain intensity, age older than 65 years, and pain radiating below the knee were significant predictors of failure. A trend was noted whereby patients receiving regular opioid therapy were more likely to experience a negative outcome. The use of cooled, rather than conventional RF, was associated with a higher percentage of positive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas several factors were found to influence outcome, no single clinical variable reliably predicted treatment results. The use of more stringent selection criteria was not associated with better outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/prevención & control , Ablación por Catéter , Desnervación/métodos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/prevención & control , Articulación Sacroiliaca/inervación , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Desnervación/efectos adversos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Dimensión del Dolor , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
Cardiol J ; 16(3): 210-7, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19437394

RESUMEN

Methadone is increasingly prescribed for chronic pain, yet the associated mortality appears to be rising disproportionately relative to other opioid analgesics. We review the available evidence on methadone-associated mortality, and explore potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic explanations for its greater apparent lethality. While methadone shares properties of central nervous system and respiratory depression with other opioids, methadone is unique as a potent blocker of the delayed rectifier potassium ion channel (IKr). This results in QT-prolongation and torsade de pointes (TdP) in susceptible individuals. In some individuals with low serum protein binding of methadone, the extent of blockade is roughly comparable to that of sotalol, a potent QT-prolonging drug. Predicting an individual's propensity for methadone-induced TdP is difficult at present given the inherent limitations of the QT interval as a risk-stratifier combined with the multifactorial nature of the arrhythmia. Consensus recommendations have recently been published to mitigate the risk of TdP until further studies better define the arrhythmia risk factors for methadone. Studies are needed to provide insights into the clinical covariates most likely to result in methadone-associated arrhythmia and to assess the feasibility of current risk mitigation strategies.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/inducido químicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Metadona/efectos adversos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Potasio/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Canales de Potasio de Tipo Rectificador Tardío/antagonistas & inhibidores , Canal de Potasio ERG1 , Canales de Potasio Éter-A-Go-Go/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Potasio/farmacocinética , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Unión Proteica , Medición de Riesgo , Torsades de Pointes/inducido químicamente , Torsades de Pointes/mortalidad , Torsades de Pointes/fisiopatología
3.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 37(4): 698-708, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18789637

RESUMEN

Chronic pain patients who are treated with opioid therapy represent a significant challenge to medical professionals. When pain recurs in the face of a previously effective opioid regimen, treatment options include dose escalation, opioid rotation, drug holidays, and the addition of adjuvants. Some experts advocate the use of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) antagonists to combat tolerance. Recently, the use of an intravenous (i.v.) ketamine infusion to predict the response to a dextromethorphan (DX) treatment trial has been described. In this study, 56 opioid-exposed patients with recurrent pain were treated with a low-dose (0.1mg/kg) i.v. ketamine test followed by a DX treatment course. Using previously designated cutoff values for a positive response to ketamine (67% or more pain relief) and DX (50% or more pain relief), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for an i.v. ketamine infusion to predict subsequent response to DX treatment were 72%, 68%, 52%, and 85%, respectively. The observed agreement between analgesic responses was 78%, indicating a highly significant correlation (r=0.54, P=0.0001). Subgroup classification revealed no significant differences in the response to either ketamine or DX treatment based on pain classification (i.e., nociceptive, neuropathic, or mixed) or placebo response. In contrast, a weaker correlation between ketamine and DX response was found in subjects requiring high-dose rather than low-dose opioid therapy. A significant correlation also was noted between the development of side effects for the two NMDA-R antagonists. Based on these results, we conclude that an i.v. ketamine test may be a valuable tool in predicting subsequent response to DX treatment in opioid-exposed patients. with persistent pain.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Disociativos , Ketamina , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Disociativos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Ketamina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...