Validation of the Emory Risk Score in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Population: A Canadian Perspective.

Background: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation may be indicated post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The Emory Risk Score (ERS) is a validated predictive risk score of the need for a PPM post-TAVI using a balloon-expandable valve. Our objectives were to determine the validity of the ERS in our local TAVI population with both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves and to identify additional electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters predictive of the need for a PPM post-TAVI. Methods: Retrospective chart and electronic database reviews were performed to collect demographic and procedural information. Two expert readers reviewed all ECGs. Independent factors associated with PPM implantation were examined with multivariable logistic regression via a stepwise selection process with calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess model discrimination. Results: The overall PPM implantation rate was 11.7%; rates were 9% for the Sapien 3 valves, 10% for the Evolut Pro valves, and 17% for the Evolut R valves. The ERS was found to not be predictive of need for PPM post-TAVI for the entire cohort. Right bundle branch block was the only ERS parameter independently associated with new PPM implant (8.5% vs 25%, odds ratio = 3.59, P = 0.01). No additional ECG parameters met the criteria for statistical significance. Conclusions: The poor predictive value of the ERS in determining the need for a PPM post-TAVI in our patient population suggests that further refinement of a formula (or risk-calculator) is warranted. Identification of a precise risk-calculator is likely to facilitate patient mobilization and reduce inpatient healthcare resource utilization.

Introduction: L'implantation d'un stimulateur cardiaque permanent (SCP) peut être indiquée après l'implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter (post-IVAC). L'Emory Risk Score (ERS) est un score de prédiction du risque validé de la nécessité d'un SCP post-IVAC au moyen d'une valve expansible par ballonnet. Nous avions pour objectif de déterminer la validité de l'ERS auprès de notre population ayant eu une IVAC soit par valve expansible par ballonnet ou valve auto-expansible, et de déterminer d'autres paramètres électrocardiographiques (ECG) prédictifs de la nécessité d'un SCP post-IVAC. Méthodes: Nous avons réalisé des revues rétrospectives de dossiers et de bases de données électroniques pour collecter les données démographiques et interventionnelles. Deux experts ont lu et interprété tous les ECG. Les facteurs indépendants associés à l'implantation du SCP ont été examinés en effectuant la régression logistique multivariée par processus de sélection pas-à-pas au moyen du calcul de la surface sous la courbe caractéristique d'efficacité du récepteur afin d'évaluer la discrimination du modèle. Résultats: Le taux global d'implantation d'un SCP était de 11,7 % ; les taux étaient de 9 % pour les valves Sapien 3, de 10 % pour les valves Evolut Pro et de 17 % pour les valves Evolut R. Nous avons observé que l'ERS ne permettait pas de prédire si l'implantation d'un SCP post-IVAC était nécessaire pour la cohorte entière. Le bloc de branche droit était le seul paramètre de l'ERS indépendamment associé à la nouvelle implantation d'un SCP (8,5 % vs 25 %, rapport de cotes = 3,59, P = 0,01). Aucun autre paramètre ECG ne satisfaisait au critère de signification statistique. Conclusions: La faible valeur prédictive de l'ERS à déterminer la nécessité d'un SCP post-IVAC au sein de notre population de patients montre que des améliorations de la formule (ou calculateur de risques) sont justifiées. L'identification d'un calculateur de risques précis devrait favoriser l'adhésion des patients et réduire l'utilisation des ressources en soins de santé en milieu hospitalier.

Multiple Primary Angiosarcomas of the Colon.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal angiosarcomas are rare and represent less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies, with most occurring in the stomach and small intestine. Occurrence in the colorectal segments is considered extremely rare. Case Report. We describe the case of a 61-year-old male with multiple primary angiosarcomas of the colon who presented with fever and abdominal pain. The patient was initially hospitalized and treated as having an infectious disease. A multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scan revealed multiple soft tissue tumors in the region of the left iliopsoas and gluteus medius muscles. After developing hematochezia, a colonoscopy was performed which found an ulcerated tumor in the sigmoid colon. The small tissue biopsy taken during the procedure presented diagnostic difficulties and was given a preliminary diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Examination of the resected colon segment and surrounding fat tissue revealed four separate tumors. Microscopically, the tumors were composed of solid sheets of spindle and epithelioid neoplastic cells with prominent nucleoli and numerous mitotic figures and immunohistochemically positive for ERG, CD31, CD34, vimentin, and CD117, while negative for CK7, CK20, CD20, CD3, CD45, TTF-1, PAN-CK, ALK, Mpox, S-100, and DOG1, leading to the final diagnosis of multiple colonic angiosarcomas. The patient's condition declined rapidly and he passed away from multiple organ failures 60 days after initial hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Both clinical and pathological diagnoses of colorectal angiosarcoma are challenging. Patients are present with nonspecific symptoms leading to mismanagement and late diagnosis. A definitive pathological diagnosis relies on immunohistochemical staining for endothelial markers. Misdiagnosis as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or GIST is possible in limited tissue biopsies.

Evaluation of irritation and sensitisation of two 50 microg/day oestrogen patches.

OBJECTIVES: To comparatively assess the irritation and sensitisation of the Estradot transdermal oestrogen patch, in healthy postmenopausal women, using the Menorest transdermal oestrogen patch, as a comparator. METHODS: In an open-label, single-centre, randomised, active-treatment, within-patient controlled study, 208 healthy postmenopausal women, age range 40-70 years, received and completed simultaneous treatment with a 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Estradot) and a 14.5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Menorest). The treatment was given for 72 h, then 96 h, for eight successive applications during an induction phase, and for 72 h during a challenge phase. There was a 14-day resting period between phases. Skin irritation (measured by erythema on a scale of 0-4), topical sensitisation, patch adherence and local skin reaction, were assessed and recorded immediately before or after removal of each patch, as appropriate. RESULTS: Most patients experienced a significant difference in irritation with Menorest than with Estradot (P < 0.0001) at the end of the induction phase. Patch loss was also significantly higher for Menorest as compared to Estradot (P = 0.0253) at the end of the induction phase. Most incidences of erythema were classified as slight (score of 1), and there was no significant difference in the percentage of topical sensitisation, or in the incidence of local skin reactions between Estradot and Menorest. Patch loss was low for both systems. CONCLUSIONS: Estradot demonstrates reduced skin irritation, superior adhesion and a lower rate of patch loss compared to Menorest.