Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) ; 9(4): 131-137, 2019 Dec 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934365

RESUMEN

Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization status facilitates isolation and decolonization and reduces MRSA infections. Liquid but not dry swabs allow fully automated detection methods. However, the accuracy of culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using liquid and dry swabs has not been analyzed. We compared different swab collection systems for routine nasal-throat MRSA screening in patients admitted to a tertiary care trauma center in Germany. Over 3 consecutive months, dry swabs (month 1), ESwabs (month 2), or MSwabs (month 3) were processed using Cepheid GeneXpert, Roche cobas and BD-MAX™ MRSA tests compared to chromogenic culture. Among 1680 subjects, the MRSA detection rate using PCR methods did not differ significantly between dry swabs, ESwab, and MSwab (6.0%, 6.2%, and 5.3%, respectively). Detection rates using chromogenic culture were 2.9%, 3.9%, and 1.9%, using dry, ESwab, and MSwab, respectively. Using chromogenic culture as the "gold standard", negative predictive values for the PCR tests ranged from 99.2-100%, and positive predictive values from 33.3-54.8%. Thus, efficient and accurate MRSA screening can be achieved using dry, as well as liquid E- or MSwab, collection systems. Specimen collection using ESwab or MSwab facilitates efficient processing for chromogenic culture in full laboratory automation while also allowing molecular testing in automated PCR systems.

2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(5): 1704-10, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22378908

RESUMEN

The Xpert Flu Assay cartridge is a next-generation nucleic acid amplification system that provides multiplexed PCR detection of the influenza A, influenza A 2009 H1N1, and influenza B viruses in approximately 70 min with minimal hands-on time. Six laboratories participated in a clinical trial comparing the results of the new Cepheid Xpert Flu Assay to those of culture or real-time PCR with archived and prospectively collected nasal aspirate-wash (NA-W) specimens and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs from children and adults. Discrepant results were resolved by DNA sequence analysis. After discrepant-result analysis, the sensitivities of the Xpert Flu Assay for prospective NA-W specimens containing the influenza A, influenza A 2009 H1N1, and influenza B viruses compared to those of culture were 90.0%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, while the sensitivities of the assay for prospective NP swabs compared to those of culture were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivities of the Xpert Flu Assay for archived NA-W specimens compared to those of Gen-Probe ProFlu+ PCR for the influenza A, influenza A 2009 H1N1, and influenza B viruses were 99.4%, 98.4%, and 100%, respectively, while the sensitivities of the Xpert Flu Assay for archived NP swabs compared to those of ProFlu+ were 98.1%, 100%, and 93.8%, respectively. The sensitivities of the Xpert Flu Assay with archived NP specimens compared to those of culture for the three targets were 97.5%, 100%, and 93.8%, respectively. We conclude that the Cepheid Xpert Flu Assay is an accurate and rapid method that is suitable for on-demand testing for influenza viral infection.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Influenza A/clasificación , Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Influenza B/clasificación , Virus de la Influenza B/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/virología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Virología/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/métodos , Cavidad Nasal/virología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 39(7): 2637-9, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427582

RESUMEN

The clinical microbiology laboratory plays a critical role in the detection of Staphylococcus aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin. Staff education and rapid laboratory response are of utmost importance. We report on our laboratory's experience and provide recommendations for the identification and confirmation of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Algoritmos , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Humanos , Laboratorios de Hospital , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA