Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Oncol ; 21(8): 1630-1635, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20089557

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To prospectively determine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in preoperatively diagnosed multiple unilateral synchronous invasive breast cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Interest of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Multiple Invasive Breast Cancer (IGASSU) study was a prospective multi-institutional study with initial breast surgery, SLNB, and systematic axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Patients eligible for the IGASSU study had an operable invasive multiple synchronous tumor (MST), defined as two or more physically separate invasive tumors in the same or different quadrant. RESULTS: From 1 March 2006 to 31 August 2007, 216 patients were prospectively included from 16 institutions. Of these patients, 211 were assessable. The SLNB-identified rate was 93.4% (197 of 211). The false-negative rate (FNR) was 13.6% (14 of 103) [95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 20%], and the accuracy was 92.9% (183 of 197) (95% CI 89% to 96%). In a univariate analysis, tumor location (only external location versus other location) was the only clinicopathological factor influencing the FNR [22% (11%-33%) versus 7% (4%-10%)], even then median aggregate histological tumor size was smaller in external tumors [17 mm (range 12-80 mm) versus 34 mm (range 8-90 mm), P = 0.016]. CONCLUSION: With a FNR of 13.6%, we do not recommend SLNB as a routine procedure for MST, even for small tumor.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Adulto , Anciano , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Chir (Paris) ; 120(8-9): 461-9, 1983.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6619225

RESUMEN

One or more repeat operations were necessary to obtain full recovery in 11 out of 350 patients receiving surgery for hyperparathyroidism. Analysis of factors, sometimes multiple, leading to failure showed: poor surgical technique (3 cases), typical (2 cases) or rare (3 cases) ectopias, a supernumerary gland (2 cases), or lack of recognition of hyperplasia of the total parathyroid system (3 cases). Indications for and tactical modalities of reoperation are discussed, and emphasis placed on the unreliability of techniques employed pre-operatively to locate the diseased gland, the very rare need for sternotomy (1 case), and the remarkable possibilities of parathyroid autografts (4 cases). (4 cases).


Asunto(s)
Hiperparatiroidismo/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/etiología , Hiperparatiroidismo/patología , Masculino , Cuello , Recurrencia , Reoperación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA