Assessment of the impact of telehealth intervention in patients with bone and joint infection.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with bone and joint infections (BJI) are involved in a complex care pathway and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Some studies have suggested that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (TI) could help to ensure better follow-up of chronic diseases. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of pharmacist-led TI on patients with BJI. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a TI on patients treated for BJIs at three weeks after hospital discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients encountered during hospitalization and receiving standardized care including TI were included in the study. All adverse events (AE) reported by patients during TI were evaluated. Impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) provided by a clinical pharmacist following TI was evaluated by CLEO© (CLinical, Economic and Organizational) scale. Patient satisfaction concerning TI was assessed by an anonymous questionnaire following medical consultation at the end of antimicrobial treatment. RESULTS: Over a 4-month period, 36 patients received TI. Fifty-two AEs were identified in 21 patients (58%). Two patients were hospitalized due to an AE. Clinical pharmacists provided 34 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 23 patients (64%). According to CLEO scale, 11 PIs had a major clinical impact (32%), 6 PIs (18%) had a favorable impact on the direct cost of treatment and 27 PIs (79%) had positive organizational impact. Concerning TI process, patients were satisfied or very satisfied, with an average score of 9.6/10. CONCLUSION: TI led to a high number of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs), with a meaningful clinical, organizational, and economic impact. Patients were also highly satisfied with this intervention.

Assessment of the impact of pharmacist-led intervention with antibiotics in patients with bone and joint infection.

OBJECTIVES: The management of patients with bone and joint infections (BJIs) is complex. To improve this care, we carried out pharmaceutical actions in the orthopedic unit, including pharmacist-led-intervention (PLI) for patients requiring prolonged antibiotics. Few data exist regarding patient compliance, adherence and knowledge in cases of BJI. Data on hospital readmission are likewise limited, even though it is considered as a major determinant of clinical impact. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of PLI regarding six-month readmissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were assigned to two groups, both receiving standardized care. Two periods were compared: control group (CG) without PLI and interventional group (IG) with PLI throughout. The analysis was based on patient records and included: proportion of rehospitalizations at 6 months for infectious causes, reasons for antibiotic dose modification or antibiotic switch after 6 weeks, and descriptive analysis of data on pharmaceutical interventions in care pathways. RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 164 patients: 105 CG (64 %) patients and 59 IG (36 %) patients. There were no significant differences between IG and CG in patients' socio-demographic characteristics, infectious factors and antibiotic regimens. Amongst the CG patients, 23 were readmitted (22 %) versus 3 patients in the IG (5 %), (p = 0.002). There were significantly fewer treatment changes after 6 weeks (28.6 % versus 15.3 %, p = 0.05) for IG patients. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective survey, our results suggest a positive impact of PLI on 6-month readmission for all causes in BJI patients. These results need to be confirmed in a multicentric study.