Pharyngeal Flap Is Effective Treatment for Post Maxillary Advancement Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Repaired Cleft Lip and Palate.

PURPOSE: Patients with repaired cleft lip and cleft palate (CL/P) can develop velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after Le Fort I maxillary advancement. The aim of this study was to evaluate speech outcomes in patients who required a pharyngeal flap after Le Fort I maxillary advancement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with repaired CL/P who underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy and subsequently required a pharyngeal flap to correct VPI. Patients were included if they had outcome measurements documented at 3 time points: 1) before Le Fort I (baseline), 2) after Le Fort I, and 3) after pharyngeal flap. Outcome measurements, including speech characteristics (resonance, nasal emission, and intraoral pressure) and velopharyngeal function, were evaluated on perceptual assessment by a speech pathologist specializing in cleft care. Velopharyngeal closure was assessed with multi-view videofluoroscopy or nasopharyngoscopy. Patient characteristics and descriptive statistics were summarized and continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired samples t test were used to measure changes in speech outcome variables between time points. All P values were 2-tailed and considered significant for values less than .05. RESULTS: There were 23 patients for analysis (13 girls [56.5%] and 10 boys [43.5%]). Two patients (9%) had cleft palate only, 9 (39%) had unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 12 (52%) had bilateral CLP. Follow-up evaluations performed on average 12 months postoperatively showed statistically meaningful improvement for all variables, including decreased hypernasality, reduced nasal emission, and increased intraoral pressure for consonant production. Patients with repaired CL/P who had VPI after Le Fort I maxillary advancement showed significant improvement in all outcome measurements after pharyngeal flap (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The superiorly based pharyngeal flap is highly successful in correcting VPI after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with repaired CL/P.

Anatomic Severity, Midfacial Growth, and Speech Outcomes in Van der Woude/Popliteal Pterygium Syndromes Compared to Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip/Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical characteristics and surgical and speech outcomes for patients with Van der Woude/popliteal pterygium syndromes (VWS/PPS) and to compare them with a historic cohort of patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip/cleft palate (CL/P). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All patients with VWS/PPS seen at Boston Children's Hospital from 1979 to 2012: 28 patients with VWS (n = 21)/PPS (n = 7) whose mean age was 17.3 ± 10.4 years, including 18 females (64%) and 10 males (36%); 18 patients (64%) had a family history of VWS/PPS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cleft type, operative procedures, speech, and midfacial growth. Data were compared with historic cohorts of patients with nonsyndromic CL/P treated at one tertiary care center. RESULTS: There were 24 patients (86%) with CP±L, Veau types I (n = 4, 17%), II (n = 4, 17%), III (n = 5, 21%), and IV (n = 11, 46%). Nine patients (38%) had palatal fistula after palatoplasty. Fourteen of 23 (61%) patients with CL/P age 5 years or older had midfacial retrusion, and 10 (43%) required a pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Fisher's exact test demonstrated higher frequencies of Veau type IV CP±L (P = .0016), bilateral CL±P (P = .0001), and complete CL±P (P < .0001) in VWS/PPS compared with nonsyndromic patients. Incidences of midfacial retrusion (P = .0001), palatal fistula (P < .0001), and need for pharyngeal flap (P = .0014) were significantly greater in patients with VWS/PPS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with VWS/PPS have more severe forms of labiopalatal clefting and higher incidences of midfacial retrusion, palatal fistula, and velopharyngeal insufficiency following primary repair as compared with nonsyndromic CL/P.

Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate.

PURPOSE: Approximately 25% to 40% of patients with cleft lip/palate develop maxillary retrusion that requires Le Fort I osteotomy. Maxillary advancement brings the soft palate forward, and this may cause velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The goal of this study was to identify predictors that place patients with repaired cleft palate at risk of developing VPI after Le Fort I advancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of nonsyndromic patients with cleft lip/palate who had a Le Fort I osteotomy between 2000 and 2008. Charts were reviewed and data were collected on patient characteristics, preoperative speech assessments, and nasopharyngoscopic reports. Pre- and postoperative cephalometric radiographs were used to measure maxillary advancement and to assess the structure of the velopharynx. Simple logistic regression analysis examined the association between each predictive variable and postoperative VPI, as indicated by need for pharyngeal flap. Predictors with P ≤ .10 were included in the multivariate regression model. In both the univariate and the multivariate analyses, P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed a significant association between preoperative soft palatal length and need for a pharyngeal flap (P = .005). By multivariate analysis, both preoperative soft palatal length and postoperative pharyngeal depth were associated with need for pharyngeal flap (P = .003 and P = .030). CONCLUSION: This study shows that a short soft palate is associated with VPI after Le Fort I osteotomy. Assessment of palatal length and pharyngeal depth on cephalometric radiographs is helpful in predicting postoperative VPI and need for a pharyngeal flap in patients with cleft palate after maxillary advancement.

Speech outcomes following pharyngeal flap in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Velocardiofacial syndrome is the most common defined disorder associated with palatal insufficiency. The authors' purpose is to evaluate one surgeon's experience with correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in velocardiofacial syndrome using a tailored pharyngeal flap. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of all children with velocardiofacial syndrome and velopharyngeal insufficiency who were managed with a pharyngeal flap between 1983 and 2009. Data collected included age at operation, preoperative videofluoroscopic findings, speech outcomes, complications, and need for a secondary operation. RESULTS: The authors identified 33 patients with velocardiofacial syndrome and velopharyngeal insufficiency who had postoperative speech evaluations. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was diagnosed at a median age of 5 years. Palatal findings were: Veau type I (n = 4), overt submucous (n = 6), or occult submucous (n = 23). Median preoperative lateral pharyngeal wall movement was 22 percent (range, 0 to 90 percent). Successful correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency was achieved in 29 of 33 patients (88 percent). One patient had a medially displaced right internal carotid artery, and evidenced intraoperative bleeding and required a blood transfusion. One patient developed obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSION: A tailored pharyngeal flap is highly effective for correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in velocardiofacial syndrome with few complications.

Submucous cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency: comparison of speech outcomes using three operative techniques by one surgeon.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare speech outcomes among three primary procedures for symptomatic submucous cleft palate (SMCP): two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning, double-opposing Z-palatoplasty, or pharyngeal flap. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary hospital. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: All children with SMCP treated by the senior author between 1984 and 2008. INTERVENTIONS: One of three primary procedures: two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning, double-opposing Z-palatoplasty, or pharyngeal flap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech outcome and need for a secondary operation were analyzed among procedures. Success was defined as normal or borderline competent velopharyngeal function. Failure was defined as persistent borderline insufficiency or velopharyngeal insufficiency with recommendation for a secondary operation. RESULTS: We identified 58 patients with SMCP who were treated for velopharyngeal insufficiency. We found significant differences in median age at operation among the procedures (p < .001). Two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning (n = 24), double-opposing Z-palatoplasty (n = 19), and pharyngeal flap (n = 15) were performed at a median of 2.5, 3.6, and 9.5 years, respectively. There were significant differences in success among procedures (p = .018). Normal or borderline competent function was achieved in 6/20 (30%) patients who underwent two-flap palatoplasty, 10/15 (67%) following double-opposing Z-palatoplasty, and 11/12 (92%) following pharyngeal flap. Among patients treated with palatoplasty, success was independent of age at operation (p = .16). CONCLUSIONS: Double-opposing Z-palatoplasty is more effective than two-flap palatoplasty with muscular retropositioning. For children older than 4 years, primary pharyngeal flap is also highly successful but equally so as a secondary operation and can be reserved, if necessary, following double-opposing Z-palatoplasty.

Pharyngeal flap outcomes in nonsyndromic children with repaired cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Velopharyngeal insufficiency occurs in 5 to 20 percent of children following repair of a cleft palate. The pharyngeal flap is the traditional secondary procedure for correcting velopharyngeal insufficiency; however, because of perceived complications, alternative techniques have become popular. The authors' purpose was to assess a single surgeon's long-term experience with a tailored superiorly based pharyngeal flap to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency in nonsyndromic patients with a repaired cleft palate. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of all children who underwent a pharyngeal flap performed by the senior author (J.B.M.) between 1981 and 2008. The authors evaluated age of repair, perceptual speech outcome, need for a secondary operation, and complications. Success was defined as normal or borderline sufficient velopharyngeal function. Failure was defined as borderline insufficiency or severe velopharyngeal insufficiency with recommendation for another procedure. RESULTS: The authors identified 104 nonsyndromic patients who required a pharyngeal flap following cleft palate repair. The mean age at pharyngeal flap surgery was 8.6 +/- 4.9 years. Postoperative speech results were available for 79 patients. Operative success with normal or borderline sufficient velopharyngeal function was achieved in 77 patients (97 percent). Obstructive sleep apnea was documented in two patients. CONCLUSION: The tailored superiorly based pharyngeal flap is highly successful in correcting velopharyngeal insufficiency, with a low risk of complication, in nonsyndromic patients with repaired cleft palate.

Palatoplasty outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with cleft palate: a 29-year assessment of one surgeon's experience.

The primary objective of cleft palate repair is velopharyngeal competence without fistula. The reported incidence of fistula and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is variable. Our purpose was to assess the senior surgeon's 29-year palatoplasty experience with respect to incidence of fistula and VPI. Our hypotheses were that VPI is related to (1) age at palatoplasty, (2) cleft palate type, and (3) VPI and palatal fistula incidence decrease with the surgeon's experience. We reviewed the records of all children with cleft palate treated by the senior author between 1976 and 2004. Cleft palate was categorized according to Veau. Palatoplasty was performed on 449 patients, using a 2-flap technique with muscular retropositioning. The mean age at palatoplasty was 11.6 +/- 4.9 months (range, 7.0-46.4 months). The incidence of palatal fistula was 2.9%, and velopharyngeal sufficiency was found in 85.1% of patients. We found a significant association between age at palatoplasty and VPI (P = 0.009, odds ratio, 1.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.10]). Velopharyngeal insufficiency was also associated with the Veau hierarchy (P = 0.001). Incidence of VPI was independent of surgeon experience (P = 0.2). In conclusion, the incidence of palatal fistula was low. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was associated with increasing age at palatoplasty and with the Veau hierarchy.