Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Pediatr ; 11: 1238522, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38161431

RESUMEN

Background: The lung ultrasound (LUS) score can be a useful tool to predict the need for respiratory support and the length of hospital stay in infants with bronchiolitis. Objective: To compare lung ultrasound features in neonates and infants up to three months of age with bronchiolitis to determine whether LUS scores (range 0-36) differ in infants with coinfections or not. Methods: Neonates and infants younger than three months admitted to neonatal units from October 2022 to March 2023, who underwent lung ultrasound evaluation on admission, were included in this retrospective study. Results: We included 60 patients who underwent LUS evaluation at admission. Forty-two infants (70.0%) had a single viral infection. Eighteen infants (30.0%) had a coinfection: fifteen infants (25.0%) had more than one virus at PCR; one infant (1.7%) had both a viral coinfection and a viral-bacteria coinfection; two infants (3.3%) had viral-bacteria coinfection. Infants with a single viral infection and those with coinfections had similar LUS scores globally and in different lung zones. An LUS score higher than 8 was identified to significantly predict the need for any respiratory support (p = 0.0035), whereas an LUS score higher than 13 was identified to significantly predict the need for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.024). Conclusion: In our small cohort of neonates and infants younger than three months hospitalized with bronchiolitis, we found no statistically significant differences in the LUS score on admission between patients with a single viral infection and those with multiple infections.

2.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 97(5): F368-70, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22933097

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) as a diagnostic marker of nosocomial sepsis (NS) and define the most accurate cut-off to distinguish infected from uninfected neonates. SETTING: Six neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). PATIENTS: 762 neonates admitted to six NICUs during a 28-month observational study for whom at least one serum sample was taken on admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive and negative predictive values at different PCT cut-off levels. RESULTS: The overall probability of an NS was doubled or more if PCT was >0.5 ng/ml. In very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants, a cut-off of >2.4 ng/ml gave a positive predictive value of NS near to 50% with a probability of a false-positive diagnosis of NS in about 10% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In VLBW neonates, a serum PCT value >2.4 ng/ml prompts early empirical antibiotic therapy, while in normal-birth-weight infants, a PCT value ≤2.4 ng/ml carries a low risk of missing an NS.


Asunto(s)
Calcitonina/sangre , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Precursores de Proteínas/sangre , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
J Pediatr ; 157(5): 856-7, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20659741

RESUMEN

Propafenone, an antiarrhythmic drug that is effective for treating supraventricular tachycardias, can induce well-known proarrhythmic and systemic adverse effects. We describe a previously unreported adverse effect in 3 newborns: oral propafenone-induced profuse oral secretions and respiratory distress of sufficient severity to necessitate discontinuation of propafenone.


Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Propafenona/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/inducido químicamente , Secreciones Corporales , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Boca , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(9): 926-33, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20645863

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections are still a major cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of nosocomial infections in NICUs and to assess the risk of nosocomial infection related to the therapeutic procedures performed and to the clinical characteristics of the neonates at birth and at admission to the NICU, taking into account the time between the exposure and the onset of infection. DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 1,692 neonates admitted to 6 NICUs in Italy were observed and monitored for the development of nosocomial infection during their hospital stay. METHODS: Data were collected on the clinical characteristics of the neonates admitted to the NICUs, their therapeutic interventions and treatments, their infections, and their mortality rate. The cumulative probability of having at least 1 infection and the cumulative probability of having at least 1 infection or dying were estimated. The hazard ratio (HR) for the first infection and the HR for the first infection or death were also estimated. RESULTS: A total of 255 episodes of nosocomial infection were diagnosed in 217 neonates, yielding an incidence density of 6.9 episodes per 1,000 patient-days. The risk factors related to nosocomial infection in very-low-birth-weight neonates were receipt of continuous positive airway pressure (HR, 3.8 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.7-8.1]), a Clinical Risk Index for Babies score of 4 or greater (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.4-3.4]), and a gestational age of less than 28 weeks (HR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.2-3.8]). Among heavier neonates, the risk factors for nosocomial infection were receipt of parenteral nutrition (HR, 8.1 [95% CI, 3.2-20.5]) and presence of malformations (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5-3.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of risk factors for nosocomial infection differ between very-low-birth-weight neonates and heavier neonates. Therapeutic procedures appear to be strong determinants of nosocomial infection in both groups of neonates, after controlling for clinical characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Peso al Nacer , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Edad Gestacional , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA