RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There are little data regarding elective referral to the military specialist, especially considering common pathologies such as spinal diseases, which, in the French forces, involve military neurosurgeons. An overview of the management of the military patient referred to neurosurgery consultation, especially considering spinal diseases that both constitute an operational healthissue in the forces and appear of special interest. The objective was to describe the reasons, demographics, and care pathways, addressed to the neurosurgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study focused on all military patients referred for neurosurgery consultation at Sainte Anne Military Hospital in Toulon. Extracted data included demographic characteristics, army, unit, military specialty, the reason for referral, the diagnosis by the neurosurgeon, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: From January 2018 to December 2019, 352 patients were referred for neurosurgical consultation by the unit general practitioner. Spinal disease (n = 297, 91%) was the most frequent reason. Lumbar degenerative disk disease accounted for 20% of consultations, regardless of the patient's unit or specialty. Most of the patients seen in consultation received nonsurgical management (n = 271, 82.6%). These patients mainly presented with cervical or lumbar degenerative disk disease (n = 99, 36.5%) or cervical or lumbar herniated discs (n = 57, 21.0%). Ninety-eight patients (29.9%) were referred exclusively for medical fitness assessment. Few patients experienced full resolution of their presenting complaint after management (n = 9, 2.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study demonstrates the predominance of degenerative spinal diseases in military patients referred to neurosurgery. It reflects the importance of the medical and military competence required to maintain operational capability upstream and downstream of war traumatology. The description of the care pathways invites us to define more proactive multidisciplinary pathways for the management of these diseases in the armed forces.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Face and/or neck burn (FNB) exposes patients to the double respiratory risk of obstruction and hypoxia, and these risks may require a tracheal intubation. This study aims to describe the incidence and the characteristics of difficult intubation in FNB patients. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year retrospective, single-center study including all patients meeting the following criteria: 18 years of age or older, an FNB at least 1% of burned surface area with a severity equal to or greater than the superficial second degree, and intubation and a burn center admission within the first 24 hours after the burn. Patients were compared according to the difficulty of their intubation. RESULTS: Between January 2007 and December 2011, we included 134 patients. The incidence of difficult intubation was 11.2% but was greater in the burn center than in the pre-burn center: 16.9% vs 3.5% (P = .02). The most important difference between patients with or without difficult intubation was the time between the burn injury and the intubation: 210 (105-290) vs 120 (60-180) minutes (P = .047). After multivariate analysis, an intubation performed at a burn center was independently associated with difficult intubation: odds ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-528. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the high incidence of difficult intubation in FNB patients, greater than 11.2%, and demonstrates that intubation is more difficult when realized at a burn center, probably because it is performed later, allowing for development of cervical and laryngeal edema.
