RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the psychosocial impact of facial skin surgery on patients can help improve counselling strategies. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to measure the psychological impact of facial skin cancer surgery on patients over a 1-year period. Secondary objective was to measure the difference between Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and conventional excision (CE) on these parameters. METHODS: This observational survey study was conducted between March 2019 and July 2020. Patients who had facial skin surgery using MMS or CE were selected. Five surveys were conducted on four timepoints (preoperative, 1 week, 3 months and 1 year post-operative) measuring the quality of life, perceived stigmatization, body image, satisfaction with facial appearance and psychosocial distress. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients (MMS 154 patients, CE 74 patients) were included for the analysis. Scores for quality of life did not significantly change, in the year after surgery (PCS-12 mean 50.5, SD 9.3 and MCS-12 50.6, SD 9.4); however, stigmatization (F (3, 235,39) 7,26, p < 0.01, d = -0.07), body image concerns (F (3, 198,28) = 3.75, p < 0.01, d = -0.14), satisfaction with facial appearance (F (3, 205,18) = 10.74, p < 0.01, d = 0.43) and psychosocial distress (F (3, 208,69) = 9.26, p < 0.01, d = -0.15) did change over time. The use of MMS or CE did not significantly affect outcome scores after 1 year. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving facial skin cancer surgery exhibited low scores for perceived stigmatization and body image concerns. Their quality of life was not statistically influenced by facial surgery, and their satisfaction with their facial appearance and psychosocial distress even improved after 1 year. The results suggest that the surgical treatment type (MMS or CE) does not influence the outcome. The overall results can help in counselling strategies to improve expectations for patients receiving facial surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is surgical excision. Failure to radically remove a cSCC is a risk for recurrence, progression and metastasis. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates several risk factors for incomplete excision of cSCC. METHODS: All consecutive patients in a single institution treated with wide local excision for primary cSCC over a 10-year period were included in this study. Risk factors such as: gender, age, immunosuppression, tumour size, location, differentiation grade, tumour depth, perineural and lymphovascular invasion (PNI and LVI) were extracted from the database. Univariable and (if applicable) multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify risk factors (P < 0.05). Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used for multiple tumours within the same patients. RESULTS: A total of 566 patients with 1159 cSCC were identified. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that depth beyond the dermis (OR: 5.7 95% CI: 3.1-10.5) was the only risk factor for incomplete excision of cSCC. Immunosuppression was only a risk factor in the deep plane (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.3-4.6). CONCLUSION: Tumour depth beyond the dermis is the most important risk factor for incomplete excision of cSCC. Immunosuppression is a risk factor in the deep plane but its relevance is uncertain. Immunosuppression is not consistently included in the current cSCC staging systems, but care should be taken when treating these patients.