Dysrhythmia as a prominent feature of Parkinson's disease: An app-based tapping test.

INTRODUCTION: Smartphone applications (apps) are instruments that assist with objective measurements during the clinical assessment of patients with movement disorders. We aim to test the hypothesis that Parkinson's disease (PD) patients will exhibit an increase in tapping variability and a decrease in tapping speed over a one-year period, compared to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Data was prospectively collected from participants enrolled in our Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program, in 2021-2023. Participants diagnosed with PD and age-matched HC were examined over a one-year-interval with a tapping test performed with customized smartphone app. Tapping speed (taps/s), inter-tap intervals and variability (movement regularity), and sequence effect were measured. RESULTS: We included 295 PD patients and 62 HC. At baseline, PD subjects showed higher inter-tap variability than HC (coefficient-of-variation-CV, 37 ms [22-64] vs 26 ms [8-51]) (p = 0.007). Conversely, there was no difference in inter-tap intervals (411 ms [199-593] in PD versus 478 ms [243-618] in HC) and tapping speed (3.42[2.70-4.76] taps/s in PD versus 3.21 taps/s [2.57-4.54] in HC) (p > 0.05). Only PD subjects (n = 135), at the one-year follow-up, showed a decreased tapping speed vs baseline (3.44 taps/s [2.86-4.81] versus 3.39 taps/s [2.58,4.30]) (p = 0.036), without significant changes in inter-tap variability (CV, 32 ms [18,55] baseline versus 34 ms [22,59] follow-up) (p = 0.142). No changes were found in HC at the one-year follow up (all p values>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-tap variability (dysrhythmia) but no inter-tap intervals or tapping speed are reliably distinctive feature of an app-based bradykinesia assessment in PD.

Recalibrating the Why and Whom of Animal Models in Parkinson Disease: A Clinician's Perspective.

Animal models have been used to gain pathophysiologic insights into Parkinson's disease (PD) and aid in the translational efforts of interventions with therapeutic potential in human clinical trials. However, no disease-modifying therapy for PD has successfully emerged from model predictions. These translational disappointments warrant a reappraisal of the types of preclinical questions asked of animal models. Besides the limitations of experimental designs, the one-size convergence and oversimplification yielded by a model cannot recapitulate the molecular diversity within and between PD patients. Here, we compare the strengths and pitfalls of different models, review the discrepancies between animal and human data on similar pathologic and molecular mechanisms, assess the potential of organoids as novel modeling tools, and evaluate the types of questions for which models can guide and misguide. We propose that animal models may be of greatest utility in the evaluation of molecular mechanisms, neural pathways, drug toxicity, and safety but can be unreliable or misleading when used to generate pathophysiologic hypotheses or predict therapeutic efficacy for compounds with potential neuroprotective effects in humans. To enhance the translational disease-modification potential, the modeling must reflect the biology not of a diseased population but of subtypes of diseased humans to distinguish What data are relevant and to Whom.

Special Issue: Immune-Mediated Neurological Disorders.

For a long time, the immune system has been considered responsible for only a minority of neurological conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous system (CNS, PNS), respectively, namely multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis (with myastheniform syndromes) [...].