Management of non-hepatic distant metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms represent an uncommon disease with an increasing incidence. Thanks to improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, metastases previously considered uncommon, such as bone metastases, or even very rare, such as brain, orbital and cardiac metastases, are more frequently found in daily practice. Due to the great heterogeneity of these neoplasms, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on the management of patients with these types of metastases. The aim of this review is to provide the current state of the art, reviewing neuroendocrine neoplasm specific studies and useful information from other tumor types and to propose a treatment recommendation with algorithms to consider in daily clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine–nab paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the real world setting

Background/objectives The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing in developed countries. The incorporation of new therapies, to the first-line treatment of patients with good performance status led to better survival in clinical trials. However, there is a wide variability in their use and some concerns about the treatment of elderly patients who were not included in the clinical trials. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter study. Data from consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) were analysed to evaluate efficacy (overall survival—OS) and toxicity. Results A total of 119 patients were included. 49.6% were treated with FFX and 50.4% with GNP in first-line. The median OS was 12 months with no statistically significant differences between both regimens (12.7 m for FFX vs 10.2 m for GnP). Elevated Ca 19.9 levels and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased the risk of death. Patients who received both regimens in first/second line had a median OS longer than 15 months whichever the sequence. 32 patients (27%) were older than 70-y. 54% patients received a second-line treatment, 56% in the FFX group and 44% in the GnP group. The median OS for patients older than 70 was 9.5 m versus 12.3 m for patients younger than 70. Progression of the disease was the cause of death in 67.6% of the patients. Conclusions In our setting, the use of FFX and GnP for treating mPC is quite similar, but superiority could not be demonstrated for any of the schemes in the first line. OS was determined by basal levels of Ca 19.9 and NLR. Patients receiving both regimens in first/second line whichever the sequence, exhibited the best survival rates. In our series, elderly patients had poorer survival rates (AU)

Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the real world setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing in developed countries. The incorporation of new therapies, to the first-line treatment of patients with good performance status led to better survival in clinical trials. However, there is a wide variability in their use and some concerns about the treatment of elderly patients who were not included in the clinical trials. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study. Data from consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) were analysed to evaluate efficacy (overall survival-OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were included. 49.6% were treated with FFX and 50.4% with GNP in first-line. The median OS was 12 months with no statistically significant differences between both regimens (12.7 m for FFX vs 10.2 m for GnP). Elevated Ca 19.9 levels and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased the risk of death. Patients who received both regimens in first/second line had a median OS longer than 15 months whichever the sequence. 32 patients (27%) were older than 70-y. 54% patients received a second-line treatment, 56% in the FFX group and 44% in the GnP group. The median OS for patients older than 70 was 9.5 m versus 12.3 m for patients younger than 70. Progression of the disease was the cause of death in 67.6% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the use of FFX and GnP for treating mPC is quite similar, but superiority could not be demonstrated for any of the schemes in the first line. OS was determined by basal levels of Ca 19.9 and NLR. Patients receiving both regimens in first/second line whichever the sequence, exhibited the best survival rates. In our series, elderly patients had poorer survival rates.

Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable gastroesophageal cancer: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUNDS: Multimodal treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer has been reported to improve disease-free survival when compared to surgery alone. We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer were treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery. The primary end point was the complete resection (R0) rate. Secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, radiological response rate, pathological response rate and downstaging rate. We also looked for prognostic and predictive factors for DFS, OS, pathological complete response and the R0 rate. RESULTS: Forty patients were found eligible for this retrospective analysis. At diagnosis, 52.5% of patients were classified as stage II and 47.5% were stage III. Forty percent of patients completed three preoperative cycles and three postoperative cycles. A tolerable toxicity related to chemotherapy was found. Thirty-nine patients underwent surgery: 80% reached a complete resection (R0), down-staging was detected in 57.5% and 17.5% had a pathologically complete response. The median time of disease-free survival was 34.05 months (95%CI 25.6-42.4), and the median time of overall survival was 39.01 months (95%CI 30.8-47.1). We found that the presence of comorbidities were independent predictive factors for the pathologic response, while the chemotherapy schedule and the clinical response could independently predict a complete resection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer can be safely delivered in daily clinical practice, obtaining an improvement of the pathologic response and the complete resection of gastric cancer.

Celecoxib in a 12-year-old boy with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by colonic polyps in early adult life. Children with this disease are at risk for colonic cancer, so prophylactic colectomy is the standard treatment to prevent this complication. Chemoprevention experience with NSAIDs in children is exceptional. This case report describes our experience with Celecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor, in a 12-year-old boy.

Linfomas en territorio de cabeza y cuello. Presentación atípica de un caso del tipo predominio linfocítico (forma no clásica) y revisión de la literatura / Lymphomas in head and neck. Presentation of an atypical case of Hodgkin’s disease with lymphocytic predominance (nodular subtype) and review of the literature

Los linfomas de Hodgkin y No Hodgkin constituyen la segunda neoplasia maligna más frecuente en el territorio de cabeza y cuello, por detrás del Carcinoma Epidermoide. Presentamos a un varón de 52 años de edad que consulta por masa pseudoquística indolente en región submaxilar derecha de cinco años de evolución, sin ningún otro dato clínico de interés. Se diagnostica de linfoma Hodgkin tipo Predominio Linfocítico Nodular, un subtipo infrecuente de linfoma que cursa con presentación atípica (AU)

Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas represent the second neoplasm in frequency in the head and neck region after epidermoid carcinoma. We present the case of a 52-year-old man who consulted for an indolent pseudocystic mass with an evolution of 5 years in the right submaxillary region. There was no other relevant clinical data. The diagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease with lymphocytic predominance, nodular subtype (HDLPN) was established. This is an atypical presentation of a rare subtype of lymphoma (AU)