The social value of a PASI 90 or PASI 100 response in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Spain.

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic disease involving the skin, which significantly impacts the quality of life. Disease severity and treatment efficacy (i.e., response) are assessed through the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). A PASI 75 response, i.e., an improvement of at least 75% with respect to the baseline PASI score, has traditionally been used as a therapeutic benchmark in clinical trials. Therapeutic advances have made PASI 90 or PASI 100 responses possible in most patients treated with some biologics. A greater response may generate social value beyond clinical outcomes that would benefit both patients and society. Methods: A 1-year economic model was applied to estimate the impact of having a PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100 response in four areas of analysis (quality of life, activities of daily living, work productivity, and out-of-pocket expenditures) and the social value of having a PASI 90 or PASI 100 response in comparison with a PASI 75 response. A mixed-methods approach based on the scientific literature, a focus group with patient, and an advisory committee with psoriasis stakeholders was used. The model included three different scenarios: having a PASI 90 vs a PASI 75 response; a PASI 100 vs a PASI 90 response; and a PASI 100 vs a PASI 75 response. A sensitivity analysis was included. Results: The annual economic impact per patient with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis having a PASI 75 response was estimated at L 6,139, mainly related to labour productivity losses and quality of life reductions. Having a PASI 90 or a PASI 100 response would reduce this impact to €3,956 or €1,353, respectively. Accordingly, the social value of having a PASI 90 instead of a PASI 75 response was estimated at €2,183, and €4,786 with a PASI 100 response. Discussion: A PASI 90 or PASI 100 response would have a lower economic impact and a greater social value than a PASI 75 response for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Attitudes, Perceptions and Practices of Influenza Vaccination in the Adult Population: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey in Spain.

In Spain, the 2021/22 influenza season overlapped with the sixth wave of the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19). Influenza is a major public health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to determine the knowledge, perceptions and practices of influenza vaccination in the Spanish population, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, with special attention paid to people over 65 years of age. A cross-sectional study was carried out by conducting 2211 telephone interviews. It was observed that 81.6% of people ≥ 65 years were vaccinated annually or with some frequency compared to 35.5% of those under 65 years (p < 0.001). Fifty percent of Spaniards showed an intention to be vaccinated in the 2021/22 campaign, during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In the case of people ≥ 65 years old, this figure was 83% compared to 42% of those under 65 years old (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of intention to be vaccinated were age of 65 years or older (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), female sex (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.4), belonging to risk groups (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.1) and having been previously vaccinated (OR 29.7, 95% CI 22.5-39.2). The main reasons for deciding to be vaccinated were the need to be protected against the virus and to be vaccinated annually. On the other hand, lack of recommendation and considering the influenza vaccine as not necessary were the main reasons for not getting vaccinated. In addition, health personnel stood out as the main source of information (32.9%) compared to traditional media (26.9%) and public administration (12.3%). This study aimed to assess and analyse the factors influencing willingness to receive influenza vaccines in the COVID-19 era among Spanish adults, as well as the main information channels and strategies to encourage vaccination.

Assessing the value contribution of bimekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis using a multidisciplinary reflective multi-criteria decision analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was proposed to surmount arbitrary clinical decisions in the field of biological therapies for psoriatic patients. At the same time, MCDA may further highlight the potential of bimekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, compared to placebo, adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and even ixekizumab and risankizumab. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The EVIDEM framework was adapted to reflect relevant criteria for the assessment. Estimated values were obtained by means of an additive linear model combining weights and scores assigned by a multidisciplinary committee of 12 experts. Consistency and replicability were evaluated through an alternative weighting method and a re-test. RESULTS: Bimekizumab was assessed by the committee as an intervention with a positive value contribution for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in comparison to any of the alternatives. The drug provides a substantial therapeutical benefits and improves the health results reported by the patients, as it combines a higher level of clearance, rapidity, and persistence with a similar safety and tolerability profile. CONCLUSIONS: Under a methodology with increasing use in the health field, bimekizumab was evaluated as a drug with a high added value for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis when compared to six different alternatives.

Unmet Needs in the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in Spain: A Multidimensional Evaluation.

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease that affects the skin, with a high impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify and determine the relative importance of unmet needs in the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Spain, from a multi-stakeholder perspective. A mixed method-approach was used to collect information, design a questionnaire and a discrete-choice exercise, and elicit the unmet needs through a multidisciplinary committee composed of 12 experts. A total of 65 unmet needs were identified and categorized into 4 areas: clinical, patient-related, decision-making process, and social. Decision-making process unmet needs were perceived as the most pressing ones, followed by social, clinical and patient-related. Individually, the need to incorporate outcomes that are important to the patients and to have treatments that achieve total clearance with a rapid onset of action and long-term persistence were the most important unmet needs.

El uso de las mascarillas en la protección de las infecciones respiratorias: una revisión de revisiones / The use of masks to protect against respiratory infections: an umbrella review

Introducción: La emergencia sanitaria global causada por la actual pandemia de COVID-19 está suponiendo un enorme desafío a todos los niveles. El uso de la mascarilla puede reducir la propagación de la infección al minimizar la excreción de las gotitas de Flügge. Así, el objetivo de este trabajo es realizar una recopilación de la evidencia disponible sobre el uso de mascarillas en relación con las infecciones respiratorias. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas (umbrella review). Dos revisores realizaron de forma independiente el proceso de cribado, la extracción y el análisis de datos. Las discrepancias fueron solventadas con un tercer revisor, y la evaluación del riesgo de sesgo de los trabajos se realizó mediante la herramienta AMSTAR-2. Para el proceso de cribado se utilizó el programa Rayyan QCRI. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 8 revisiones sistemáticas. Los estudios analizaron el uso en población general, en centros de cuidados de larga duración, centros hospitalarios, eventos masivos y compararon la efectividad para evitar las infecciones. Los resultados de esta revisión ponen de manifiesto que el uso de las mascarillas se asocia a un efecto protector frente a las infecciones respiratorias, tanto en los centros sanitarios como en los centros de cuidados de larga duración y en los eventos masivos. Conclusiones: A la luz de los resultados parece razonable recomendar el uso de las mascarillas a la población general, pero este uso debe venir acompañado de un plan de formación para mejorar el cumplimiento, ya que su uso inadecuado puede favorecer la infección.(AU)

Introduction: The global health emergency caused by the current COVID-19 pandemic is resulting in a huge challenge at all levels. The use of masks may reduce the spread of the infection by minimising the excretion of Flügge droplets. The objective of this study was to compile the evidence available on the use of masks in relation to respiratory infections. Methodology: An umbrella review (review of systematic reviews) was conducted. Two reviewers independently carried out the screening process, data extraction and data analysis. Discrepancies were resolved with a third reviewer, and the assessment of the risk of bias of the studies was carried out using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The Rayyan QCRI program was used for the screening process. Results: A total of eight systematic reviews were included. The studies analysed the use of masks in the general population, in long-term care facilities, in hospitals and at mass gatherings, and compared the effectiveness thereof in preventing infection. The results of this review revealed that the use of masks is associated with a protective effect against respiratory infections in healthcare facilities, in long-term care facilities and at mass gatherings. Conclusions: In light of the results, it seems reasonable to recommend the use of masks to the general population, but this use should be accompanied by a training programme to improve compliance, as not using them properly may increase the risk of infection.(AU)

The use of masks to protect against respiratory infections: An umbrella review.

INTRODUCTION: The global health emergency caused by the current COVID-19 pandemic is resulting in a huge challenge at all levels. The use of masks may reduce the spread of the infection by minimising the excretion of Flügge droplets. The objective of this study was to compile the evidence available on the use of masks in relation to respiratory infections. METHODOLOGY: An umbrella review (review of systematic reviews) was conducted. Two reviewers independently carried out the screening process, data extraction and data analysis. Discrepancies were resolved with a third reviewer, and the assessment of the risk of bias of the studies was carried out using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The Rayyan QCRI program was used for the screening process. RESULTS: A total of eight systematic reviews were included. The studies analysed the use of masks in the general population, in long-term care facilities, in hospitals and at mass gatherings, and compared the effectiveness thereof in preventing infection. The results of this review revealed that the use of masks is associated with a protective effect against respiratory infections in healthcare facilities, in long-term care facilities and at mass gatherings. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the results, it seems reasonable to recommend the use of masks to the general population, but this use should be accompanied by a training programme to improve compliance, as not using them properly may increase the risk of infection.

The use of masks to protect against respiratory infections: an umbrella review. / El uso de las mascarillas en la protección de las infecciones respiratorias: una revisión de revisiones.

INTRODUCTION: The global health emergency caused by the current COVID-19 pandemic is resulting in a huge challenge at all levels. The use of masks may reduce the spread of the infection by minimising the excretion of Flügge droplets. The objective of this study was to compile the evidence available on the use of masks in relation to respiratory infections. METHODOLOGY: An umbrella review (review of systematic reviews) was conducted. Two reviewers independently carried out the screening process, data extraction and data analysis. Discrepancies were resolved with a third reviewer, and the assessment of the risk of bias of the studies was carried out using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The Rayyan QCRI program was used for the screening process. RESULTS: A total of eight systematic reviews were included. The studies analysed the use of masks in the general population, in long-term care facilities, in hospitals and at mass gatherings, and compared the effectiveness thereof in preventing infection. The results of this review revealed that the use of masks is associated with a protective effect against respiratory infections in healthcare facilities, in long-term care facilities and at mass gatherings. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the results, it seems reasonable to recommend the use of masks to the general population, but this use should be accompanied by a training programme to improve compliance, as not using them properly may increase the risk of infection.

A Multiple Stakeholder Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Diabetic Macular Edema Management: The MULTIDEX-EMD Study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and economic management of retinal diseases has become more complex following the introduction of new intravitreal treatments. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers the potential to overcome the challenges associated with traditional decision-making tools. OBJECTIVES: A MCDA to determine the most relevant criteria to decision-making in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in Spain was developed. This MCDA was termed the MULTIDEX-EMD study. METHODS: Nineteen stakeholders (7 physicians, 4 pharmacists, 5 health authorities and health management experts, 1 psychologist, and 2 patient representatives) participated in this three-phase project. In phase A, an advisory board defined all of the criteria that could influence DME treatment decision-making. These criteria were then screened using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) (phase B). Next, a multinomial logit model was fitted by applying the backward elimination algorithm (relevant criteria: p value < 0.05). Finally, the results were discussed in a deliberative process (phase C). RESULTS: Thirty-one criteria were initially defined (phase A) and grouped into 5 categories: efficacy/effectiveness, safety, organizational and economic impact, patient-reported outcomes, and other therapeutic features. The DCE results (phase B) showed that 10 criteria were relevant to the decision-making process for a 50- to 65-year-old DME patient: mean change in best corrected visual acuity (p value < 0.001), percentage of patients with an improvement of ≥ 15 letters (p value < 0.001), effect duration per administration (p value = 0.008), retinal detachment (p value < 0.001), endophthalmitis (p value = 0.012), myocardial infarction (p value < 0.001), intravitreal hemorrhage (p value = 0.021), annual treatment cost per patient (p value = 0.001), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p value = 0.004), and disability level (p value = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: From a multi-stakeholder perspective, the selection of an appropriate treatment for DME patients should guarantee patient safety and maximize the visual acuity improvement and treatment effect duration. It should also contribute to system sustainability by being affordable, it should have a positive impact on HRQoL, and it should prevent disability.

Negative clinical outcomes of medication resulting in emergency department visits.

PURPOSE: The results of analyses of patients' health problems related to medication use have been highly variable due to various factors, such as different study methodology, diverse variables determined, fields of study. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence and preventability of negative clinical outcomes of medication (NCOMs). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study performed in the emergency departments (EDs) of nine Spanish hospitals during a 3-month period. A two-stage probabilistic sampling method was used , and a systematic appraisal tool was used to identify the NCOMs based on information gathered through patient interview and review of the medical records. Case evaluations were conducted in two phases by pharmacists and physicians. The prevalence and preventability of NCOM were calculated. A homogeneity test was performed to assess potential differences in the prevalence for each hospital. RESULTS: A total of 4,611 patients were included in the study. The overall prevalence of NCOMs was 35.7 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 33.3-38.1]. These NCOMs could be divided into three categories: ineffectiveness (18.2 %; 95 % CI 16.2-20.1), necessity (14.9 %; 95 % CI 13.4-16.6), and lack of safety (2.4 %; 95 % CI 1.9-2.8). About 81 % (95 % CI 80.1-82.3) of the NCOMs could have been prevented. CONCLUSIONS: NCOMs provoked approximately one-third of visits to the EDs, and a high percentage of these were preventable. Implementation of strategies for patient safety and pharmaceutical care could help to prevent these problems and optimize the use of medications.

[Risk indicators of preventable morbidity related to drug utilization]. / Indicadores de riesgo de morbilidad prevenible causada por medicamentos.

OBJECTIVE: To select clinical situations that can be used as risk indicators of preventable morbidity caused by drugs at the community pharmacies, and to study their acceptability, in terms of pertinence and relevance. METHODS: We used the Delphi technique, in 2 rounds, by a panel of 14 medical doctors and pharmacists experts, to study the relevance of 68 types of clinical situations as risk indicators of preventable morbidity related to drug utilization used by health professionals in community pharmacies, with scientific evidence of foreseeable adverse result, frequent situations in ambulatory care and with controllable cause and result. RESULTS: 43 of the 68 indicators were considered usable and pertinent. The indicators referred three areas: drug type (medications of narrow therapeutic margin, with individualized dose and adverse reactions frequent and severe), health problem (chronic problems, especially asthma, cardiac, thyroid and prostate illness, and pain), and patient (old or with several medications. Pharmacists systematically overvalued some indicators in relation to the doctors, but differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-three indicators were selected as valuable to identify situations of preventable morbidity related to drug utilization.

Indicadores de riesgo de morbilidad prevenible causada por medicamentos / Risk indicators of preventable morbidity related to drug utilization

Objetivos: Seleccionar y estudiar la aceptabilidad, en términos de relevancia y pertinencia, de ciertas situaciones clínicas que puedan usarse como indicadores de riesgo de morbilidad prevenible causada por medicamentos y que sean utilizables en las farmacias comunitarias. Método: Método Delphi, en 2 rondas, con un panel de 14 expertos médicos y farmacéuticos que valoraron la relevancia y pertinencia de 68 tipos de situaciones clínicas como indicadores de morbilidad potencial relacionada con medicamentos, detectable por el profesional en su medio, con evidencia científica de resultado adverso previsible, frecuentes en el medio ambulatorio y con causa y resultado controlables. Resultados: Se consideraron utilizables y pertinentes 43 de los 68 indicadores estudiados, que se referían a 3 ámbitos: tipo de medicamento (medicamentos de estrecho margen terapéutico, con dosis individualizada y con reacciones adversas frecuentes y graves), problema de salud (problemas crónicos, especialmente asma, enfermedad cardíaca, tiroidea, prostática y dolor) y tipo de paciente (ancianos y/o polimedicados). Los farmacéuticos sobrevaloraron sistemáticamente ciertos indicadores en relación con los médicos, aunque las diferencias no fueron significativas. Conclusiones: Se identificaron 43 indicadores de morbilidad potencial relacionada con los medicamentos e identificables por los profesionales en su entorno

Objective: To select clinical situations that can be used as risk indicators of preventable morbidity caused by drugs at the community pharmacies, and to study their acceptability, in terms of pertinence and relevance. Methods: We used the Delphi technique, in 2 rounds, by a panel of 14 medical doctors and pharmacists experts, to study the relevance of 68 types of clinical situations as risk indicators of preventable morbidity related to drug utilization used by health professionals in community pharmacies, with scientific evidence of foreseeable adverse result, frequent situations in ambulatory care and with controllable cause and result. Results: 43 of the 68 indicators were considered usable and pertinent. The indicators referred three areas: drug type (medications of narrow therapeutic margin, with individualized dose and adverse reactions frequent and severe), health problem (chronic problems, especially asthma, cardiac, thyroid and prostate illness, and pain), and patient (old or with several medications. Pharmacists systematically overvalued some indicators in relation to the doctors, but differences were not significant. Conclusions: Forty-three indicators were selected as valuable to identify situations of preventable morbidity related to drug utilization

Medicine-related problems resulting in emergency department visits.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of medicine-related problems, understood as negative clinical outcomes, that result in hospital emergency department (ED) visits and to establish relationships among risk factors and the appearance of pharmacotherapy negative outcomes. METHODS: Methods A stratified two-stage probabilistic sampling approach was used which consisted of stratified random sampling of patients visiting the ED followed up by interviews. A systematic appraisal tool was used to identify pharmacotherapy negative outcomes within the framework of the information gathered. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. Cost per process was estimated. RESULTS: The prevalence of pharmacotherapy negative outcomes producing ED visits was 33.17% (95%CI: 31.09-35.25). These negative outcomes could be divided into three categories: ineffectiveness (19.76%; 95%CI: 17.92-21.60), necessity/use (10.52%; 95%CI: 9.48-11.56), and lack of safety (2.89%). About 73% (95%IC: 70.03-76.23) of the negative outcomes were considered to be preventable. Average cost per negative outcome was 329.5 euros (95%CI: 185.4-473.5). Factors associated with the appearance of negative outcomes were age, number of medicines taken, and the combined effect of both of these factors. Compared with those participants younger than 18 years, patients between 45 and 64 years of age presented an odds ratio (OR) of 2.52 (95%CI: 1.1-5.78), while those older than 65 years had an OR of 3.63 (95%CI: 1.27-10.35). Compared with people not using medicine(s), patients using one to two different medicines presented with an OR = 19.91 (95%CI: 8.28-47.87), and those using more than three medicines had an OR = 22.71 (95%CI: 3.05-69.26). Finally, compared with patients younger than 18 years and not using medicines, patients aged 45-64 years taking three or more different medicines presented with an OR = 64.07, while those older than 65 years taking three or more medicines presented with an OR = 31.50. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of negative clinical outcomes was 33%, of which more than 73% of these were preventable. Factors associated with their appearance were age, number of medicines, and their combined effect.

[Health related problems as cause of visits to hospital emergency departments]. / Problemas de salud relacionados con los medicamentos en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are health problems resulting from patient pharmacotherapy failure that interfere with the expected outcome in the patient's health status. The aim of this study was to discover the health problems associated with the appearance of MRPs. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patient interviews, together with the assessment of medical records were the sources of information used in the assessment and identification of MRPs. A validated questionnaire was used for the interviews; in order to classify the health problems found, the ICD-9 was used. RESULTS: 2,556 patients were interviewed over a period of one year at a hospital emergency department. 2,261 of these cases were valid. Osteoarticular diseases, poorly defined signs and symptoms of illness, injuries and intoxications were the disorders most commonly associated with the appearance of MRPs. MRPs of necessity and effectiveness had a similar profile. MRPs of safety were more commonly associated with poorly defined signs and symptoms of illness, injuries and intoxications, as well as nervous, digestive and blood problems. CONCLUSIONS: Most frequent medication related health problems causing visits to hospital emergency departments were osteoarticular disorders, followed by poorly defined signs and symptoms of illness. Differences were observed in the diagnoses between the different dimensions and types of MRP.

Problemas de salud relacionados con los medicamentos en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario / Health related problems as cause of visits to hospital emergency departments

FUNDAMENTO Y OBJETIVO: Los problemas relacionados con los medicamentos (PRM) son problemas de salud que se producen como consecuencia de fallos de la farmacoterapia del paciente y que interfieren con los resultados esperados de salud. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer los problemas de salud más frecuentes que constituyen PRM. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: La entrevista con el paciente junto con la evaluación de la historia clínica son las principales fuentes de información para evaluar e identificar PRM. Se utilizó un cuestionario validado como instrumento para la entrevista y la CIE-9 para la clasificación de los problemas de salud encontrados. RESULTADOS: Se entrevistó a un total de 2.556 pacientes durante 1 año en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario, de los que se estudiaron 2.261 tras las exclusiones. Las enfermedades osteoarticulares, los signos y síntomas mal definidos y las lesiones y envenenamientos son los problemas más relacionados con la aparición de PRM. Los PRM de necesidad y efectividad mantienen un perfil similar. Los PRM de seguridad se asociaron más a signos y síntomas mal definidos y lesiones y envenenamientos así como a alteraciones nerviosas, digestivas y sanguíneas. CONCLUSIONES: Los PRM más frecuentes que son causa de consulta en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario son los osteoarticulares, seguidos de los signos y síntomas mal definidos. Se observan diferencias en los diagnósticos entre las distintas dimensiones de PRM y sus tipos

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are health problems resulting-from patient pharmacotherapy failure that interfere with the expected outcome in the patient’s health status. The aim of this study was to discover the health problems associated with the appearance of MRPs. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patient interviews, together with the assessment of medical records were the sources of information used in the assessment and identification of MRPs. A validated questionnaire was used for the interviews; in order to classify the health problems found, the ICD-9 was used. RESULTS: 2,556 patients were interviewed over a period of one year at a hospital emergency department.2,261 of these cases were valid. Osteoarticular diseases, poorly defined signs and symptoms of illness, injuries and intoxications were the disorders most commonly associated with the appearance of MRPs. MRPs of necessity and effectiveness had a similar profile. MRP sof safety were more commonly associated with poorly defined signs and symptoms of illness, injuries and intoxications, as well as nervous, digestive and blood problems. CONCLUSIONS: Most frequent medication related health problems causing visits to hospital emergency departments were osteoarticular disorders, followed by poorly defined signs and symptoms of illness. Differences were observed in the diagnoses between the different dimensions and types of MRP

[Primary health care and responsibilities of public health in 6 countries of Europe and North America: a pilot study]. / Atencion primaria y responsabilidades de salud pública en seis países de Europa y América del Norte: un estudio piloto.

BACKGROUND: Rapidly occurring changes within the health care systems are creating an opportunity to re-orient the relationships between their different sectors. In order to know the locus of responsibility for various types of preventive activities, we undertook an inquiry on eight areas in six countries from Europe and North America. METHODS: An inquiry among experts based on a matrix which arrayed the type of preventive health services against the target population. Eight clinical conditions were identified (childhood immunizations; adult influenza vaccination; mammography screening, tuberculosis screening, hypertension screening. PKU screening, HIV screening, and osteoporosis testing) trying to know their target population and the locus of responsibility for setting of policy, level to contact individuals for testing, follow-up of people with abnormal tests and maintenance of their medical records. RESULTS: This pilot study showed very little results coincidence either within the eight surveyed areas or across them. There was no regular pattern for the preventive activities studied among the different countries, neither according to the type of health system, nor to the primary health care orientation of the different systems. CONCLUSIONS: There was a limited consensus in the activities studied concerning the best mode of doing public health interventions for personal health services.

Nuevos criterios para determinar la evitabilidad de los problemas relacionados con los medicamentos. Una revisión actualizada a partir de la experiencia con 2558 personas / No disponible

No disponible

Seguimiento farmacoterapéutico integral de pacientes en el Sistema sanitario / No disponible

No disponible

La Atención Farmacéutica como método para mejorar la salud de los pacientes y la coordinación entre los profesionales médicos y farmacéuticos (Contestación a Enrique Costas Lombardía) / No disponible

No disponible

Anorexia nerviosa. Algunas claves sobre el discurso de la epidemia / Anorexia nervosa: some key issue on the discourse on epidemics

No disponible