Incidence and Long-Term Prognosis of Cancer After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Malignancy is an important cause of mortality in renal transplants recipients. The incidence of cancer is increased by immunosuppressive treatment and longer kidney graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, prognosis and survival of posttransplant malignancies: solid organ cancer (SOC), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). METHODS: We retrospectively studied the development of cancers among kidney transplants patients in our hospital from January 1979 to January 2015. We analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics, risk factors, and patient survival after tumor diagnosis. RESULTS: We included 1450 kidney transplants recipients with a mean follow-up was 10 years; among them, 194 developed malignancies. The mean age at presentation was 59 ± 10 years. The SOC, PTLD, and NMSC incidences were 6.2%, 1.2%, and 6%, respectively. The most common tumors were kidney (16.6%), colon (11%), bladder (10%), breast (10%), prostate (10%), and lung (8.8%). The median times to development of a SOC, PTLD, and NMSC were 6.86 (range, 3.7-12), 4.43 (range, 1.8-5.7), and 8.19 (range, 3.8-12.2) years, respectively. Risk factors associated with developing SOC and PTLD were patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; P < .001) and time posttransplant (OR, 1.05; P = .02), whereas for NMSC were to be male (OR, 3.61; P < .001), to take calcineurin inhibitors (OR, 2.17; P = .034), patient age (OR, 1.05; P < .001) and time posttransplant (OR, 1.15; P < .01). The mean survival time from the diagnosis of SOC, PTLD, and NMSC were 2.09 (range, 0.1-5.3), 0.22 (range, 0.05-1.9), and 7.68 (range, 3.9-10.5) years, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SOC occurs more frequently than other malignancies among renal transplant patients. NMSC has better survival and prognosis. Older patients and prolonged graft function have a greater risk of developing malignancies.

Tyrosine-phosphatase and glutamate-decarboxylase antibodies after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation: do they have an impact on pancreas graft survival?

INTRODUCTION: The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with auto-antibodies. These auto-antibodies contribute to pancreatic ß-cell destruction. Tyrosine-phosphatases (IA-2) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) are the most frequently used by clinicians. When T1DM patients develops advanced chronic kidney disease, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation becomes the best option. However, pancreatic graft survival is limited. The role of the auto-antibodies on pancreas graft survival remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess pancreas graft survival according to the presence of GAD65 and IA-2 auto-antibodies after SPK transplantation. METHODS: We analyzed all SPK transplantations performed in our hospital since January 1990 to December 2013 with at least 30 days of pancreas graft survival. We collected demographic and clinical variables from donors and recipients. Graft failure was defined as complete insulin independence after transplantation. Pancreatic graft survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 152 SPK transplantations were performed during the period. One hundred sixteen were accessed for de novo post-transplantation auto-antibodies. Also, 17.8% (n = 27) were positive for anti-GAD65, 13.8% (n = 20) for IA-2, 3.9% (n = 6) were positive for both, and the rest were negative for any auto-antibody (n = 63). Kaplan-Meier survival curves estimated a worst pancreas graft survival for patients with positive IA-2 antibodies versus those patients with negative auto-antibodies and GAD65+auto-antibodies (P = .003 and .022, respectively, by log-rank). Mean pancreas graft survival rates at first and fifth year were 72% and 64%, respectively, for those patients with positive IA-2. CONCLUSIONS: IA-2 antibodies after SPK transplantation are associated with long-term graft lost compared with the rest of the groups. Monitoring of these auto-antibodies after SPK may help to identify patients with a higher risk of graft failure.

Index high insulin resistance in pancreas-kidney transplantation contributes to poor long-term survival of the pancreas graft.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) is the best therapeutic option for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Peripheral insulin resistance and the percentage of remaining ß-cells in the PKT have been little studied in medical literature. METHODS: We analyzed PKT performed in our hospital from January 1992 to January 2014, with follow-up for 5 years. Metabolic values related to glycemic were studied, namely, proteinuria, peptide C, glucose, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin. We analyzed insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment [HOMA]-IR), the percentage of remaining ß-cells (HOMA-ß), and the influence of these variables on the glycemic profile and graft survival. RESULTS: In the study period, 156 simultaneous PKT were performed in our center. At 2 years posttransplantation, the median value of HOMA-IR kidney-pancreas was 4. We compared transplantation with lower HOMA-IR (<4) and higher HOMA-IR (>4). HOMA-ß (36 [26-67] vs 29 [14-42]; P = .04), glucose (86 [80-90] vs 81 [74-89]; P = .018), and body mass index (BMI; 24 [21-27] vs 21 [19-24]; P = .013) were greater in the group HOMA-IR>4 versus HOMA-IR<4 group, respectively, after 3 months. These differences in glycemic profile were maintained until the first year after transplantation. At 2 and 5 years of follow-up, the HOMA-IR>4 group showed higher glucose levels and greater BMI, but not differences in HOMA-ß. At 1 and 5 years posttransplantation, pancreatic graft survival in the HOMA-IR>4 group (82.9% vs 92.5%) was lower compared with the HOMA-IR<4 group (67% vs 87.5%; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: PKT exhibit an altered glycemic profile in the posttransplantation follow-up associated with the percentage of remaining ß-cells and peripheral insulin resistance. PKT patients with peripheral insulin resistance showed decreased pancreatic graft survival.

Outcomes in renal transplantation with expanded-criteria donors.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. In recent years donor criteria have changed to increase the percentage of expanded-criteria donors (ECDs). The aim of this study was to analyze transplants from ECDs obtained at our institution from. 2010 to 2012. We studied the comorbidity of ECD, preimplantation histologic study, renal function, and survival of transplanted grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty ECDs (160 kidneys) were analyzed. Forty-nine grafts were not implanted owing to macroscopic lesions (37 kidneys) or histologic findings on preimplantation biopsy (12 kidneys). Finally, 60 grafts from ECDs were implanted in our center. We analyzed the characteristics of the grafts (kidney function, creatinine clearance) and compared the data with a control group of allografts from standard-criteria donors (n = 14). RESULTS: The median age of the ECD group was 72 years (range 65-77). No differences were found in certain characteristics between the ECDs whose kidneys were or were not implanted (hypertension, diabetes, creatinine at the time of the donation or proteinuria). However, there were differences in donor age (75 vs 67; P = .043), increased preimplantation biopsy score (6.8 ± 1.3 vs 4.8 ± 1.1; P = .041), and a higher percentage of cardiovascular disease (62.5% vs 43%; P = .038). Comparison of ECD and non-ECD grafts showed a lower creatinine clearance at 1 year (50 ± 05 mL/min vs 69 ± 96 mL/min, respectively; P < .001) and 2 years (50 ± 07 mL/min vs 67 ± 74 mL/min; P < .001) after transplantation. There were no differences in delayed graft function or graft survival between the 2 groups at 2 years after transplantation (95% vs 100%; P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in graft survival from ECD compared with the control group of standard-criteria donors. The evaluation of grafts from ECD may be a strategy to increase the number of kidney transplants.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation: survey of a single center in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is a common complication of advanced liver failure and liver transplantation. Since the introduction of the MELD criteria the proportion of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and need for liver transplantation has increased. One alternative is the combined liver-kidney transplant (CLKT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of this type of transplant in our center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all combined simultaneous or sequential transplants from 1989 to 2012. We studied demographic and clinical variables. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In the study period, 1,265 kidney and 1,050 liver transplantations were performed; 34 were CLKT (to 29 adults and 5 children); 13 of these were simultaneous and 12 sequential liver-kidney. We also carried out 4 triple liver-pancreas-kidney transplantations, 3 simultaneous and 1 sequential. The mean age was 44.1 ± 15 years, and 27 were male (93.1%); 9 (37.5%) were diabetic. The main causes of liver disease were viral (n = 11 [41.3%; hepatitis virus B, C, or both] and alcoholism (9 [31%]). The renal disease etiology was unknown in 16 (55.1%), IgA nephropathy in 2 (6.8%), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in 2 (6.8%), and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in 4 (13.6%). Transjugular renal biopsy was performed in 6 sequential transplants. Survival of patients who received a CLKT was excellent: 91%, 51%, and 40%, at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. No significant difference was found between sequential and simultaneous transplants (log rank 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our results of CLKT show results similar or superior to those of other series and are an alternative to consider in candidates for liver transplantation with chronic kidney disease. Transjugular biopsy is an alternative to study the etiology of renal disease in patients with hepatic dysfunction before or after liver transplantation.