Effectiveness and tolerability of oral administration of low-dose salmon oil to HIV patients with HAART-associated dyslipidemia.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of low-dose salmon oil for the treatment of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-induced dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients. METHOD: Randomized, open-label, parallel and crossover, multicenter study. Patients received 1 g salmon oil tid for 24 weeks (SO-24) or no additional treatment for 12 weeks and salmon oil for weeks 12 to 24 (CT-SO). The primary outcome measure was the change in triglyceride (TG) levels. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients completed the study (26 in SO-24; 32 in CT-SO). After 12 weeks, the SO-24 group experienced a mean TG reduction of 1.1 mmol/L, compared to an increase of 0.3 mmol/L for the CT-SO group (p = .040). When CT-SO patients were crossed over to salmon oil treatment, mean TG decreased by 0.7 mmol/L (p = .052). Concomitant use of fibrates, statins, or both were reported by 16 (27.6%), 10 (17.2%), and 8 (13.8%), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that salmon oil produced a significant decrease in TG levels independent of other lipid-lowering medications (p = .022). There were 26 predominately mild treatment-emergent (antiretroviral or salmon oil) nonserious adverse events reported by 22 (33.3%) patients. CONCLUSION: Low-dose salmon oil (3 g/day) is effective and well-tolerated in reducing TG levels in HIV-infected patients receiving HAART.

Randomized controlled trial of once-daily tenofovir, lamivudine, and lopinavir/ritonavir versus remaining on the same regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients on their first PI-containing HAART regimen.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of switching to once-daily (QD) lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based combination therapy in HIV-infected patients who are virologically suppressed (HIV viral load <50 copies/mL) on their first protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen. METHOD: In this 48-week, prospective, open-label, randomized study, patients were either switched to once-daily LPV/r, tenofovir (TDF), and lamivudine (3TC) (QD arm) or remained on their existing regimen (control arm). The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients maintaining virologic suppression following 48 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty and 22 patients were randomized to the QD and control arms, respectively. At week 48, there was no significant difference in virological suppression between the QD and control arms using intent-to-treat (missing = failure) analysis (p = .44). There was no significant difference in discontinuation rates between the two arms (p = .66). Significantly more patients randomized to the QD arm reported gastrointestinal adverse events compared with the control arm (p = .009). There were no study drug-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: For patients who are already virologically suppressed on their first PI-containing regimen, switching to a QD regimen of TDF+3TC+LPV/r resulted in similar rates of virologic suppression when compared with staying on existing therapy.

Clinic-initiated, twice-daily oral famciclovir for treatment of recurrent genital herpes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Famciclovir, the oral prodrug of penciclovir, is effective for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes. This randomized, clinic-initiated, double-blind trial compared the therapeutic efficacy and safety of treatment with famciclovir at dosages of 125 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg twice daily for 5 days with placebo in immunocompetent adults with a recurrent episode of genital herpes. METHODS: Efficacy and tolerability were assessed in 308 patients with lesions present for no more than 6.5 h at the time of the first dose. Two assessments per day were performed to increase the precision of the determination of study end points. RESULTS: All doses of famciclovir were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the time to cessation of viral shedding, complete lesion healing, and loss of all lesion-associated symptoms, particularly lesion tenderness, pain, and itching. Patients receiving treatment with famciclovir were significantly less likely to experience new lesions than were patients receiving placebo. All doses of famciclovir were tolerated as well as placebo was. There was no difference in efficacy or tolerability among the different doses of famciclovir; the lowest effective dose was 125 mg twice per day. CONCLUSIONS: In immunocompetent adults with recurrent genital herpes, a 5-day course of famciclovir at a dosage of 125 mg, 250 mg, or 500 mg twice per day was significantly more effective than was placebo in reducing the duration of viral shedding and symptoms and in accelerating lesion healing. These results support the use of treatment with famciclovir at a dosage of 125 mg for 5 days as an effective, well-tolerated treatment for episodes of recurrent genital herpes.

Effective treatment of herpes simplex labialis with penciclovir cream: combined results of two trials.

BACKGROUND: Two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trials were conducted in Europe and North America to compare the efficacy and safety of topical 1 percent penciclovir cream with a placebo cream. METHODS: A total of 4,573 immunocompetent people with a history of recurrent herpes simplex labialis, or HSL, with three or more episodes a year that typically manifested as classical lesions, were enrolled and prospectively dispensed medication-either 1 percent penciclovir in a cetomacrogol cream base or a matching placebo. Patients self-initiated treatment and were required to apply study medication six times per day for the first day and every two hours while awake for four consecutive days. RESULTS: Of 4,573 enrolled patients, 3,057 initiated treatment (1,516 with penciclovir and 1,541 with placebo). Combined data from two trials revealed that penciclovir recipients lost classical lesions 31 percent faster than did placebo recipients (hazard ratio, or HR, = 1.31; 95 percent confidence interval, or CI, 1.20 to 1.42; P = .0001) and experienced 28 percent faster resolution of lesion pain (HR = 1.28; 95 percent CI, 1.17 to 1.39; P = .0001). Significant benefits were achieved with penciclovir use whether treatment was initiated in the early stages (P = .001) or later stages (P = .0055). CONCLUSIONS: The largest data set currently available on the treatment of recurrent HSL revealed that penciclovir cream significantly outperformed the placebo in healing classical lesions and resolution of pain. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The authors found that penciclovir cream positively affects recurrent HSL, and dose frequency is vital to topical treatment. Even when penciclovir was applied late, it was effective in favorably altering the course of recurrent HSL.