Time is Short: Tools to Integrate Palliative Care and Communication Skills Education into Your Surgical Residency.

The need to integrate palliative care (PC) training into surgical education has been increasingly recognized. Our aim is to describe a set of PC educational strategies, with a range of requisite resources, time, and prior expertise, to provide options that surgical educators can tailor for different programs. Each of these strategies has been successfully employed individually or in some combination at our institutions, and components can be generalized to other training programs. Asynchronous and individually paced PC training can be provided using existing resources published by the American College of Surgeons and upcoming SCORE curriculum modules. A multiyear PC curriculum, with didactic components of increasing complexity for more advanced residents, can be applied based on available time in the didactic schedule and local expertise. Simulation-based training in PC skills can be developed to provide objective competency-based training. Finally, a dedicated rotation on a surgical palliative care service can provide the most immersive experience with steps toward clinical entrustment of PC skills for trainees.

Surgeon-Patient Cross∼Talk: How It Happens, How to Fix It.

Surgeon-patient communication is fraught with difficulties. Cross∼talk can be conceptualized as surgeons and patients speaking different languages, working out of different cerebral hemispheres. While as surgeons we principally function from our left brains, our patients are universally working from their right hemisphere, because the situation they find themselves in is new and overshadowed by extreme existential angst. Respecting patient autonomy is best done by shared decision-making, in which we attempt to bridge into the patient's right brain, openly exploring, and helping crystalize their values through a deliberative method that utilizes collaborative pushback. This approach is preferable to trying to drag them into our left-brained "fix it" mental model by informing them of the location in our well-worn surgical algorithm and asking them to choose between treatment options. Surrogates are under extreme psychosociospiritual duress, which can overwhelm and blunt their left-brained cognitive processing abilities (organizing information in working memory, evaluating options, and processing advice). However, this challenge can be overcome with empathy and by explaining the benefits and practice of substituted judgment during each family meeting. Whenever possible, the Palliative Triangle-surgeon, patient, family-should be established and executed preoperatively in high-stakes surgical scenarios to mitigate distress and prevent nonbeneficial value-incongruent over-treatment.

Spirituality in Surgery-A Double-Edged Scalpel.

Investigating, respecting, and working with surgical patients' spiritualities is as critical a skill as the proficient technical performance of operations. When spirituality is ignored, sacred patient values remain undiscovered, authentic trust is hindered, and healthy shared decision-making processes suffer. These are instances when the other edge of the spiritual scalpel comes back to cut us as surgeons, but more importantly, upon withdrawal of spiritual understanding, it deeply injures our patients and their families. Spiritual screening, spiritual history taking, engaged, active listening, and big-picture prognostic truth-telling while promoting hope are critical skills for efficacious whole-person surgical care and the healing of our surgical patients' suffering-in all aspects of their humanity. These skills require surgeon introspection and vulnerability, however, as well as regular practice, and can be quite difficult; frequently leading to understandable discomfort, particularly when the surgeon does not share the patient's spiritual orientation or religious commitments. This literature-based essay addresses all of these issues, providing surgeons with a variety of new spiritual tools for their holistic armamentarium to promote healing, rather than further injury.

Timing is everything: Early versus late palliative care consults in trauma.

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of dedicated palliative care (PC) services in the care of the critically injured trauma patient is not yet universal. Preexisting data demonstrate both economic and clinical value of PC consults, yet patient selection and optimal timing of these consults are poorly defined, possibly leading to underutilization of PC services. Prior studies in geriatric patients have shown benefits of PC when PC clinicians are engaged earlier during hospitalization. We aim to compare hospitalization metrics of early versus late PC consultation in trauma patients. METHODS: All patients 18 years or older admitted to the trauma service between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2021, who received a PC consult were included. Patients were assigned to EARLY (PC consult ≤3 days after admission) and LATE (PC consult >3 days after admission) cohorts. Demographics, injury and underlying disease characteristics, outcomes, and financial data were compared. Length of stay (LOS) in the EARLY group is compared with LOS-3 in the LATE group. RESULTS: A total of 154 patient records met the inclusion criteria (60 EARLY and 94 LATE). Injury Severity Score, head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, and medical comorbidities (congestive heart failure, dementia, previous stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy) were similar between the groups. The LATE group was younger (69.9 vs. 75.3, p = 0.04). Patients in the LATE group had significantly longer LOS (17.5 vs. 7.0 days, p < 0.01) and higher median hospital costs ($53,165 vs. $17,654, p < 0.01). Patients in the EARLY group had reduced ventilator days (2.4 vs. 7.0, p < 0.01) and reduced rates of tracheostomies and surgical feeding tubes (1.7% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Trauma patients with early PC consultation had shorter LOS, reduced ventilator days, reduced rates of invasive procedures, and lower costs even after correcting for delay to consult in the late group. These findings suggest the need for mechanisms leading to earlier PC consult in critically injured patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Concordant palliative care delivery in advanced head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the palliative care consultation practices in an academic head and neck surgery practice. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a palliative care database and the health record for all palliative care consultations of patients suffering from advanced stage head and neck cancer within a 21-month period. RESULTS: Ten head and neck cancer patients received palliative care consults while on the otolaryngology service. One consultation occurred preoperatively; nine occurred postoperatively, on a median of hospital day 9. At the time of referral, seven patients were in the ICU and three were on a surgical floor. Code status de-escalation occurred in six patients and psycho-socio-spiritual suffering was supported in all consultations. Nine patients died within six months, with a median post-consultation survival of 35 days. Of these, two died in an ICU, five were discharged to hospice, one to a SNF, and one to a LTACH. CONCLUSION: Palliative care consultation in this advanced head and neck cancer cohort was commonly late, however, significant suffering was mitigated following most consults. Palliative care specialists are experts at eliciting patient values, determining acceptable tradeoffs and suffering limitations by employing a shared decision-making process that ends with a patient-centered value-congruent treatment recommendation. Oftentimes, this embraces curative-intent or palliative surgery, along with contingency plans for unacceptable value-incongruent postoperative outcomes. Enhanced awareness of the benefits of embracing concordant palliative care in advanced head and neck cancer patients may help overcome the significant barriers to involving palliative care experts earlier.

Development of an Advance Care Planning Portal-Based Tool for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Cognitive Impairment: The ACPVoice Tool.

Background: Patient portals can be an innovative and efficient way to engage patients in advance care planning (ACP). However, comprehension and judgment in older adults with cognitive impairment presents several barriers and challenges to engaging in new technology. Our objective was to develop an ACP portal-based tool (ACPVoice) for community-dwelling persons living with cognitive impairment (PLCI) by engaging end-users in the design process. Methods: Two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted to identify and resolve cognitive issues related to comprehension, judgment, response, and to assess content validity. Purposive sampling was used with the goal of enrolling 15 different participants (five with mild cognitive impairment and five dyads (those with mild dementia and their care partner) in each round to assess respondents' understanding of questions related to advance care planning to be administered via the patient portal. Results: Twenty PLCI (mean age 78.4, 10 females [50%]) and ten care partners (mean age 60.9, 9 females [90%]) completed cognitive interviews between May 2021 and October 2021. The mean Mini-Mental State Examination score for PLCI was 25.6 (SD 2.6). Unclear wording and undefined vague and/or unfamiliar terms were the major issues identified. Revisions to item wording, response options, and instructions were made to improve question comprehension and response as well as navigational ease. Conclusion: Minor changes to the wording, format, and response options substantially improved respondents' ability to interpret the item content of the ACPVoice tool. Dissemination and implementation of the ACPVoice tool could help to engage community-dwelling PLCI in ACP discussions.

The value of compassion: Healthcare savings of palliative care consults in trauma.

BACKGROUND: The effects of palliative care (PC) consultation on patient costs and hospitalization metrics in the adult trauma population are unclear. STUDY DESIGN: We interrogated our Level I trauma center databases from 1/1/19 to 3/31/21 for patients age ≥18 admitted to the trauma service. Patients undergoing PC consult were matched using propensity scoring to those without PC consultation based on age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score and Head Abbreviated Injury Scale. Total costs, total cost per day, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, intubation days, discharge disposition, and rates of nephrology consultation and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements were compared. RESULTS: 140 unique patients underwent PC consultation and were matched to a group not receiving PC consult during the same period. Median total costs in the PC cohort were $39,532 compared to $70,330 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per day in the PC cohort were $3,495 vs $17,970 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per ICU day in the PC cohort were $3,774 vs $17,127 in the controls (p<0.01).  Mean hospital LOS (15.7 vs 7 days), ICU LOS (7.9 vs 2.9 days), and ventilator days (5.1 vs 1.5) were significantly higher in the PC cohort (all p<0.01).  Rates of nephrology consultation (8.6 vs 2.1%, p = 0.03) and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements (12.1 vs 1.4%, p<0.01) were also higher in the PC group.  Patients were more likely to discharge to hospice if they received a PC consult (33.6 vs 2.1%, p<0.01).  Mean time to PC consult was 7.2 days (range 1 hour to 45 days). LOS post-consult correlated positively with time to PC consultation (r = 0.27, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Expert PC services are known to alleviate suffering and avert patient goal- and value-incongruent care. While trauma patients demand significant resources, PC consultation offered in concordance with life-sustaining interventions is associated with significant savings to patients and the healthcare system. Given the correlation between LOS following PC consult and time to PC consult, savings may be amplified by earlier PC consultation in appropriate patients.

Layers of Loss: A Scoping Review and Taxonomy of HD Caregivers' Spiritual Suffering, Grief/Loss and Coping Strategies.

CONTEXT: Huntington's disease (HD), an incurable, multi-generational, autosomal dominant disorder, creating unique challenges and a myriad of spiritually-related stressors in those affected and their familial caregivers. Spiritual suffering, experiences of grief/loss, and coping strategies have not been systematically studied in HD caregivers. OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively define spiritual suffering, grief/loss, and coping strategies used by HD caregivers. METHODS: A PRISMA-ScR scoping literature review was conducted. Data from included research articles were organized thematically using induction and open coding. A grounded, deductive approach was used to delineate a demarcated taxonomy of themes, which encompasses all three over-arching domains. Four reviewers, employing a modified Delphi approach, ascertained which themes were demonstrated by research participants in each study. RESULTS: 36 of 583 articles met the review criteria; none were published in the palliative care literature. Investigations primarily focused on intrapersonal (self-image) distress and existential angst; only rarely looking deeper into divine/transpersonal suffering, disrupted religious relationships, or meaning distress. HD caregivers experience profound grief/loss, expressed as disenfranchised grief that is associated with the ambiguous loss of their loved one, loss of family structure, social connectedness, and personal losses. Half of the studies reported maladaptive HD caregiver coping strategies-characterized by dysfunctional escape schemes; in contrast, transcendent/creative strategies were often unexplored. CONCLUSION: HD caregivers experience prolonged grief and other forms of spiritual suffering as they progressively lose their loved ones and disruption to their own lives. With an improved assessment tool, teams with spiritual and palliative care experts will better be able to support HD family caregivers.

Primary palliative care for surgeons: a narrative review and synthesis of core competencies.

The practice of palliative medicine has grown substantially over the last two decades and the data demonstrates that seriously ill and injured surgical patients as well as their loved one's benefit from the integration of palliative care into standard surgical management. This narrative review highlights the patient and family benefit of primary surgical palliative care (PSPC) for seriously ill or injured surgical patients and the need for primary palliative care (PPC) skill acquisition by surgeons. The review encourages surgeons to identify all aspects of suffering as a critical component of the care needs of surgical patients and families and to consider integrating mitigation strategies during surgical care. Identification of suffering has not been traditionally taught in surgical training or reinforced in surgical practice, therefore current surgical educational opportunities should incorporate such instruction to assist surgeons in training and in practice to acknowledge and treat suffering to improve and expand the quality and value of surgical care offered to seriously ill or injured surgical patients. Additionally, a patient-centered approach to surgical care necessitates engaging advanced communication skills to successfully ascertain a patient's and/or their surrogate decision maker's, substituted goals and values in the provision of surgical care to ensure that all the care delivered is aligned with each patient's preferences. A preliminary synthesis of core competencies to achieve these SPC objectives is presented.

Where's the Value in Preoperative Covenants Between Surgeons and Patients?

Values, preferences, and goals all affect patient autonomy. Their meanings are often conflated, so this article clarifies them and also distinguishes between hope and wish. Ethical investigation of preoperative and postoperative clinician-family communication in surgical intensive care units is needed to help mitigate value-incongruent, nonbeneficial operations and postoperative treatments as clinical scenarios unfold.

Shared Decision-Making in the Context of Uncertain Care Goals and Outcomes: Dissecting a Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Case Complicated by Enterocutaneous Fistulae.

Surgeons care deeply about their patients, their patient's surgical outcomes, and their fund of knowledge as it relates to disease, treatment options, and risk is remarkable. Unfortunately, surgical patients' values, hopes, fears, and unacceptable levels of suffering are rarely elicited and addressed while constructing surgical treatment plans, even when the stakes are high. How can surgeons bring all their experience, education, and expertise to bear in a patient-centered manner amidst uncertainty? Surgeons typically emulate mentors who either employed a solely informative, facilitative, or directive/paternalistic approach to decision-making. These 3 styles fail to simultaneously address: (1) what matters most to patients and (2) the surgeon's expertise. Since communication in each of these 3 approaches is unidirectional, and the decisional power locus is imbalanced, they are unshared, nonpartnering, and-perhaps surprisingly-not patient-centered. Patient-centered, collaborative shared decision-making (SDM) approaches align with palliative care principles and are rarely employed, taught, or modeled. Furthermore, nonpartnering approaches to surgical decision-making are often laden with unintended consequences, such as patient and family suffering and the suffering of surgeons. We present the high-risk case of an abdominal gunshot wound in a morbidly obese man, which was complicated by 3 enterocutaneous fistulae and a loss of abdominal wall integrity, where ongoing empathic, partnering SDM dialogue is enabling a patient-centered and value-concordant care plan. The authors invite you to virtually journey with us as this case unfolds, as the impending surgical decisions are substantial and weighty. Uncertainty and risks appear at every turn-providing additional challenges to overcome.

Navigating the Murky Waters of Hope, Fear, and Spiritual Suffering: An Expert Co-Captain's Guide.

How can surgeons deliver compassionate, holistic care to patients who are beyond cure? Interacting emotionally and understanding hope, fear, and spiritual suffering is key. Responsibly reframing hope to underlying meanings, and away from specific outcomes, is critical. Facilitating moves from cure to comfort to a peaceful dying process requires some retooling of the surgical toolbox. Surgeons possess a unique set of skills, including imagination and an undying sense of hope. Surgeons who have the courage to delve into their emotions and sustain realistic hope for their patients, all the way to the end, will reap deep personal and professional rewards.

Bruno's Score.

Many of our experiences in hospice and palliative care medicine are challenging. We support dying patients and their families as they struggle with the transition from life to death and continue to support those in mourning. Many times, in America, it is difficult to even appreciate a glimmer of spiritual grace as our patients die. We easily remain stuck in the material and distance ourselves from the spiritual. Some exits are quite graceful, however. I present the case of an exceptional person, who enjoyed an exceptional life and had an exceptionally graceful dying process and death, in hopes that his story may encourage other healers as much as he inspired me. Bruno was a composer and cognitive musicologist, whose art forms of light and music simultaneously move and challenge virtually all the people and other artists he interfaced with and taught, including his talented wife and family, his friends, his acquaintances, his students, his colleagues, and his deans. He embodied theories as diverse as mathematical strange loops, continually paradoxical/recursive illusory art, contrapuntal fugues, and artificial intelligence. Bruno's spirituality was uncommonly profound. It spanned and interconnected many eclectic faith traditions, theologies, and philosophies, including Taoism, Greek mythology, distributed cognition, mathematics, and Tibetan Buddhism. It resonated strongly with Zen and Christian mysticism. Some of Bruno's being and transformation to nonbeing was obvious; some of it was inscrutable.