Lymph Node Evolution in Eyelid and Orbit Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a large cohort of eyelid and periorbital SCCs, to compare the location of the tumor and of the pathological lymph nodes, and to analyze the risk factors for lymph node involvement among tumor characteristics. METHODS: All patients managed inside our institution for an eyelid and periorbital SCCs were included. Tumor characteristics, imaging setup, excision margins, lymph node evolution features, local, regional, and distant recurrences rates, and global survival were reported. The risk for lymph node involvement and location of pathological lymph nodes were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and August 2022, 115 patients were included, and 18 presented a lymph node evolution (15.7%), involving the parotid gland in 16 cases (88.9%), the submental and submandibular areas in seven cases (38%), and the jugular and carotid areas in four cases (22%). Tumor size above 20 mm, infiltration of the external canthus and periorbital structures, the presence of perineural invasion or vascular embolism, the depth of infiltration, and the presence of a local recurrence were significantly associated with the risk of lymph node evolution. CONCLUSION: Periorbital and eyelid SCCs present a true potential for lymph node evolution especially through the parotid gland. Extension setup including the parotid gland and neck should be mandatory, and lymph node dissection should be associated in case of parotidectomy for lymph node involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Laryngoscope, 2024.

"Ice cream cone" design of forearm free flap for orbital exenteration reconstruction.

BACKGROUNDS: Reconstruction post-orbital exenteration serves the dual purpose of expediting healing, laying the groundwork for cosmetic restoration, and minimising complications such as orbitosinusal fistulae. The aim of this study was to introduce a modified "Ice cream cone" (ICC) design of the Radial Forearm Free Flap (RFFF) technique used for reconstruction of orbital exenteration cavity, along with the oncological, functional, and aesthetic outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study between January 2005 and December 2020. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients treated for orbitosinusal malignancies undergoing exenteration with subsequent ICC design of RFFF reconstruction. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent exenteration with the ICC design of RFFF. At the follow-up conclusion, 65% of patients regularly used orbital prosthesis. The average waiting time until the prosthesis was 10 months. Quality of life questionnaires yielded average RFFF POSAS scores of 23.5 (SD 13,6), cervical POSAS scores of 8 (SD 13,2), and orbital cavity rehabilitation scores of 5.9 (SD: 3,32). CONCLUSIONS: ICC design of RFFF is a reliable technique. It can be proposed in cases of extended exenteration with a high risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but more generally in cases of total exenteration. This technique facilitates optimal postoperative wound healing and accommodates early radiotherapy. Importantly, the bowl-shaped aspect of the orbital socket supports effective prosthetic rehabilitation for patients opting for orbital prosthesis post-surgery.

Over 132 Years Ago, the Inaugural Immunotherapy Treated Its First Head and Neck Cancer Patient.

Immunotherapy in oncology has a more extensive history than is commonly perceived. Rooted in the observations and experiences of multiple physicians in the late 19th century, immunological interventions are currently integral to the oncological therapeutic repertoire. This article seeks to delineate the evolution of cancer immunotherapy, tracing its inception in 1891 with the pioneering work of an American surgeon, William B. Coley, who achieved the first documented cure of a cancer case involving a malignant head and neck tumor. The narrative extends to encompass successive historical breakthroughs and prospective developments in this dynamic field.