RESUMEN
Integration-defective lentiviral vectors (IDLVs) have become an important alternative tool for gene therapy applications and basic research. Unfortunately, IDLVs show lower transgene expression as compared to their integrating counterparts. In this study, we aimed to improve the expression levels of IDLVs by inserting the IS2 element, which harbors SARs and HS4 sequences, into their LTRs (SE-IS2-IDLVs). Contrary to our expectations, the presence of the IS2 element did not abrogate epigenetic silencing by histone deacetylases. In addition, the IS2 element reduced episome levels in IDLV-transduced cells. Interestingly, despite these negative effects, SE-IS2-IDLVs outperformed SE-IDLVs in terms of percentage and expression levels of the transgene in several cell lines, including neurons, neuronal progenitor cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells. We estimated that the IS2 element enhances the transcriptional activity of IDLV LTR circles 6- to 7-fold. The final effect the IS2 element in IDLVs will greatly depend on the target cell and the balance between the negative versus the positive effects of the IS2 element in each cell type. The better performance of SE-IS2-IDLVs was not due to improved stability or differences in the proportions of 1-LTR versus 2-LTR circles but probably to a re-positioning of IS2-episomes into transcriptionally active regions.
RESUMEN
Primary immunodeficiencies, including Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS), are a main target for genome-editing strategies using specific nucleases (SNs) because a small number of corrected hematopoietic stem cells could cure patients. In this work, we have designed various WAS gene-specific CRISPR/Cas9 systems and compared their efficiency and specificity with homodimeric and heterodimeric WAS-specific zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), using K-562 cells as a cellular model and plasmid nucleofection or integration-deficient lentiviral vectors (IDLVs) for delivery. The various CRISPR/Cas9 and ZFN SNs showed similar efficiency when using plasmid nucleofection for delivery. However, dual IDLVs expressing ZFNs were more efficient than dual IDLVs expressing Cas9 and guide RNA or all-in-one IDLVs, expressing Cas9 and guide RNA in the same vector. The specificity of heterodimeric ZFNs and CRISPR/Cas9, measured by increments in γ-H2AX focus formation in WAS-edited cells, was similar for both, and both outperformed homodimeric ZFNs independently of the delivery system used. Interestingly, we show that delivery of SNs, using IDLVs, is more efficient and less genotoxic than plasmid nucleofection. We also show the similar behavior of heterodimeric ZFNs and CRISPR/Cas9 for homology-directed gene knock-in strategies, with 88 and 83% of the donors inserted in the WAS locus, respectively, whereas when using homodimeric ZFNs only 45% of the insertions were on target. In summary, our data indicate that CRISPR/Cas9 and heterodimeric ZFNs are both good alternatives to further develop SN-based gene therapy strategies for WAS. However, IDLV delivery of WAS-specific heterodimeric ZFNs was the best option of all systems compared in this study.
