RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: School-based comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is a powerful tool that provides young people with information on all aspects of sexuality and is aimed at protecting their sexual and reproductive health and well-being throughout their lives. Currently, CSE is not integrated within the schools' curriculum in Italy. This study describes the co-construction, implementation, and evaluation of a CSE project piloted among students attending lower secondary schools, in four regions of Italy. Evidence-based evaluation will be helpful in promote the inclusion of CSE programs in the Italian schools' curriculum. METHODS: The pilot scheme was co-constructed by a multidisciplinary curriculum development group through a Delphi process, including educators who conducted the activities. The evaluation followed three directions: the program (based on a literature review of CSE principles and recommended characteristics), implementation (assessing the execution of the program through the analysis of the reflection tools used by the educators), and short-term outcomes (assessing critical thinking and conscious behavioural choices through pre-post and satisfaction surveys). RESULTS: The main goal, learning modules and content were defined and structured in five interventions with the students, and two with families and teachers. A total of 638 students were involved in the activity, across 11 schools. Data analysis of pre/post surveys reported a significant increase in knowledge in 12 of the 15 items investigated (p < 0.05), and a high level of satisfaction with the topics addressed. Qualitative analysis added information on the pivotal role of educators in CSE. CONCLUSIONS: The national piloting of this educational activity provided positive insights regarding the co-construction, implementation and short-outcome evaluation, suggesting potential for scalability and future inclusion of CSE in the curricula of Italian schools.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Educación Sexual , Humanos , Italia , Educación Sexual/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , Instituciones Académicas , Técnica Delphi , Desarrollo de Programa , Estudiantes/psicología , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been shown that COVID-19 affects people at socioeconomic disadvantage more strongly. Previous studies investigating the association between geographical deprivation and COVID-19 outcomes in Italy reported no differences in case-hospitalisation and case-fatality. The objective of this research was to compare the usefulness of the geographic and individual deprivation index (DI) in assessing the associations between individuals' deprivation and risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection and disease severity in the Apulia region from February to December 2020. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Participants included individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the study period. The individual DI was calculated employing polychoric principal component analysis on four census variables. Multilevel logistic models were used to test associations between COVID-19 outcomes and individual DI, geographical DI, and their interaction. RESULTS: In the study period, 139,807 individuals were tested for COVID-19 and 56,475 (43.5%) tested positive. Among those positive, 7902 (14.0%) have been hospitalised and 2215 (4.2%) died. During the first epidemic wave, according the analysis done with the individual DI, there was a significant inversely proportional trend between the DI and the risk of testing positive. No associations were found between COVID-19 outcomes and geographic DI. During the second wave, associations were found between COVID-19 outcomes and individual DI. No associations were found between the geographic DI and the risk of hospitalisation and death. During both waves, there were no association between COVID-19 outcomes and the interaction between individual and geographical DI. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this study shows that COVID-19 pandemic has been experienced unequally with a greater burden among the most disadvantaged communities. The results of this study remind us to be cautious about using geographical DI as a proxy of individual social disadvantage because may lead to inaccurate assessments. The geographical DI is often used due to a lack of individual data. However, on the determinants of health and health inequalities, monitoring has to have a central focus. Health inequalities monitoring provides evidence on who is being left behind and informs equity-oriented policies, programmes and practices. Future research and data collection should focus on improving surveillance systems by integrating individual measures of inequalities into national health information systems.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Gravedad del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a single-stranded RNA virus, is a leading cause of hospitalization in infants, especially ≤ 2 months of life. In the light new immunization strategies adoption, we described epidemiological and clinical characteristics of RSV-associated hospitalizations in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units of the Policlinico Foggia Hospital, Apulia Region, Italy. METHODS: Hospitalized children with a laboratory-confirmed RSV infection from 2011 to 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical information was collected from Hospital Discharge Registry in the period 2011-2020. The proportion of the hospitalization for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) associated to RSV was calculated and the hospitalization cost was analyzed by using the diagnosis-related group reimbursement rate. The anticipated impact of immunization either with monoclonal antibodies or maternal immunization on the number of hospitalizations was estimated. All analyses and quality assessment were performed using STATA/SE15.0. RESULTS: A total of 1,005 RSV-cases were included in the study, of which 86.3% occurred between December-March. In the period 2011-2020, 832 RSV-cases were matched with the corresponding hospital admissions; 75.2% were aged < 1 year (49.6% 0-2 months). Bronchiolitis was the most frequent admission diagnosis occurring in 63.3% of patients; 25% of children were affected by a very severe RSV-disease. Younger age ≤ 2 months (OR:14.8, 95%CI:8.30-26.31, p = 0.000), higher length-of-hospital-stay (OR:1.01, 95%CI:1.0-1.02, p = 0.030) and history of prematurity (OR:4.4, 95%CI:1.57-12.11, p = 0.005) were associated with a higher disease severity. RSV caused 48.9% of ARIs among children < 1 year. The mean cost of an RSV-associated hospitalization was 3,036 euros/year, with the higher cost in the 0-2 months age group (4,225 euros/year). Immunization programs with nirsevimab could prevent 51.4 RSV hospitalizations/year and 18.1 very severe RSV disease/year in infants < 1 year of age. RSV vaccine could prevent 46.1 of hospitalizations/year caused by RSV within 180 days after birth. CONCLUSIONS: Our study contributes to outlining the baseline profile of RSV-associated hospitalizations among Italian children by providing epidemiological/clinical/economic estimates. While awaiting new recommendations on immunization, healthcare-workers should persist in implementing public health measures and appropriate case management to control RSV seasonal epidemics. Strengthened laboratory RSV surveillance is needed to inform the implementation of the new immunization strategies.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/terapia , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Priorix-Tetra™ (MMRV GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' vaccine) was developed based on the existing measles-mumps-rubella and varicella vaccines. In this study, we aimed to estimate the effectiveness of the combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella Priorix-Tetra™ vaccine against varicella in real-world conditions. We conducted a post-marketing retrospective case-control study in the Apulia region of Italy in children aged 1-9 years born between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016. We assessed the effectiveness against varicella of all grades of severity (including hospitalisation) and against hospitalisation for varicella of a single and two doses of Priorix-Tetra™. Moreover, we also assessed effectiveness of monovalent varicella (monovalent-V) vaccine and any varicella vaccines. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1-OR) x 100. We introduced demographic variables in the model to adjust Vaccine effectiveness (aVE) by potential confounders (sex and year of birth). We recorded 625 varicella cases and matched them with 1,875 controls. Among 625 cases, 198 had received a single MMRV dose, 10 two MMRV doses, 46 a single monovalent-V dose, none two monovalent-V doses; four a monovalent-V as first dose and MMRV as second dose, and one a MMRV as first dose and monovalent-V as second dose; 366 cases were not vaccinated. The aVE against varicella of all grades of severity was 77.0% and 93.0% after a single dose and after two doses of MMRV, respectively. The aVE against varicella of all grades was 72.0% after a single dose of monovalent-V vaccine. The aVE against varicella of all grades of severity was 76.0% after a single dose and 94.0% after two doses of any varicella vaccine. The aVE against varicella hospitalisation was 96% after a single dose of any varicella vaccine. Priorix-Tetra™ showed to be an effective vaccine and the two-dose schedule should be recommended to optimise immunisation programmes. A single dose was able to provide protection against varicella hospitalisation.
Asunto(s)
Varicela , Sarampión , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Paperas/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunas Combinadas , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas , Italia/epidemiología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
In Europe, National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) were established in most countries to promote evidence-informed decision-making in introducing new or improved vaccines or changing recommendations for existing ones. Still, the role, activities and outcomes of NITAGs have not been optimally implemented across Europe. Within the European Joint Action on Vaccination (EU-JAV), we conducted a survey to collect information on decision-making process including the main criteria for the introduction of new vaccines or changes to recommendations on their use. Between December 2021 and January 2022, 13 of the 28 European countries invited participated in an online survey. The criteria ranked as most relevant were disease burden and availability of financial resources. Only one country specified that the NITAG recommendations were binding for the government or the health authority. Vaccinations more often reported for introduction or recommendation changes were those against herpes zoster, influenza, human papillomavirus infection, pneumococcal and meningococcal disease. The planned changes will mainly address children and adolescents (2-18â¯years) and adults (≥â¯45-65â¯years). Our findings show potential overlaps in the activities of NITAGs between countries; and therefore, collaboration between NITAGs may lead to optimisation of the workload and better use of resources.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Vacunación , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Inmunización , Vacunas Neumococicas , Europa (Continente)RESUMEN
Importance: Population-based data on the 4-component recombinant protein-based (4CMenB) vaccine effectiveness and reduction in incidence rate ratios (IRRs) are continuously needed to assess vaccine performance in the prevention of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Objective: To assess the effectiveness and reduction in IRRs associated with the 4CMenB vaccine in the pediatric population in 6 regions in Italy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort screening study and case-control study included data from children aged younger than 6 years in 6 highly populated Italian regions from January 1, 2006, to January 1, 2020. Participants included children younger than 6 years diagnosed with serogroup B IMD without predisposing factors. Data were collected from regional surveillance and vaccination registries and were analyzed from September 2021 to January 2022. Exposures: Routine 4CMenB vaccination, per regional vaccination programs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the effectiveness of the 4CMenB vaccine in the prevention of serogroup B IMD in the population of children aged younger than 6 years in 6 Italian regions. The percentages of vaccine effectiveness (VE) were obtained through the concomitant use of a screening method and a case-control study. Secondary outcomes were the comparison of effectiveness results obtained using the 2 different computational methods, the description of serogroup B IMD incidence rates, and reduction in IRRs before and after 4CMenB introduction, as a proxy for vaccine impact. Results: The cohort screening study included a resident population of 587â¯561 children younger than 6 years in 3 regions with similar surveillance protocols, and the matched-case controls study assessed a resident population of 1â¯080â¯620 children younger than 6 years in 6 regions. Analyses found that 4CMenB VE in fully immunized children was 94.9% (95% CI, 83.1%-98.4%) using the screening method and 91.7% (95% CI, 24.4%-98.6%) using the case-control method. Overall reduction in IRR was 50%, reaching 70% in regions with early-start vaccination schedules. The case-control method involving 6 highly-populated Italian regions included 26 cases and 52 controls and found an estimated VE of 92.4% (95% CI, 67.6%-97.9%) in children old enough for the first vaccine dose and 95.6% (95% CI, 71.7%-99.1%) in fully immunized children. VE was more than 90% for partially immunized children. Even in regions where the first dose was administered at age 2 months, almost 20% of unvaccinated cases were among infants too young to receive the first 4CMenB dose. Conclusions and Relevance: This screening cohort study and matched case-controls study found high effectiveness of 4CMenB vaccination and greater reduction in IRR for early-start vaccination schedules in preventing invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease. The high proportion of children too young to be vaccinated among unvaccinated cases suggests that starting the vaccination even earlier may prevent more cases. Screening and case-control methods provided similar estimates of VE: either method may be used in different study settings, but concomitant use can provide more robust estimates.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Niño , Lactante , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serogrupo , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Italia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
During COVID-19 vaccination campaign, possible ChAdOx1-S-associated risks of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome led to implement ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 heterologous vaccination, despite the limited information on its reactogenicity and safety. We conducted a prospective observational post-marketing surveillance study to assess the safety of this heterologous schedule. A casually selected sample of recipients (n: 85; age: 18-60 years) of ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 at the vaccination hub of the Foggia Hospital, Italy, was matched with an equal sample of recipients of homologous BNT162b2. Safety was evaluated 7 days, 1 month and 14 weeks after the primary vaccination series using an adapted version of the "V-safe active surveillance for COVID-19 vaccine safety" CDC standardized questionnaire. After 7 days, local reactions were highly frequent (>80%) in both groups, and systemic reactions were less common (<70%). Moderate or severe pain at the injection site (OR = 3.62; 95%CI, 1.45-9.33), moderate/severe fatigue (OR = 3.40; 95%CI, 1.22-9.49), moderate/severe headache (OR = 4.72; 95%CI, 1.37-16.23), intake of antipyretics (OR = 3.05; 95 CI%, 1.35-6.88), inability to perform daily activities and work (OR = 2.64; 95%CI, 1.24-5.62) were significantly more common with heterologous than homologous vaccination. No significant difference in self-reported health status was recorded 1 month or 14 weeks after the second dose with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2. Our study confirms the safety of both heterologous and homologous vaccination, with a slight increase in some short-term adverse events for the heterologous regimen. Therefore, administering a second dose of a mRNA vaccine to the recipients of a previous dose of viral vector vaccine may have represented an advantageous strategy to improve flexibility and to accelerate the vaccination campaign.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Italia , MercadotecníaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been characterised by its global and rapid spread, with high infection, hospitalisation, and mortality rates worldwide. However, the course of the pandemic showed differences in chronology and intensity in different geographical areas and countries, probably due to a multitude of factors. Among these, socio-economic deprivation has been supposed to play a substantial role, although available evidence is not fully in agreement. Our study aimed to assess incidence and fatality rates of COVID-19 across the levels of socio-economic deprivation during the first epidemic wave (March-May 2020) in the Italian Province of Foggia, Apulia Region. METHODS: Based on the data of the regional active surveillance platform, we performed a retrospective epidemiological study among all COVID-19 confirmed cases that occurred in the Apulian District of Foggia, Italy, from March 1st to May 5th, 2020. Geocoded addresses were linked to the individual Census Tract (CT) of residence. Effects of socio-economic condition were calculated by means of the Socio-Economic and Health-related Deprivation Index (SEHDI) on COVID-19 incidence and fatality. RESULTS: Of the 1054 confirmed COVID-19 cases, 537 (50.9%) were men, 682 (64.7%) were 0-64 years old, and 338 (32.1%) had pre-existing comorbidities. COVID-19 incidence was higher in the less deprived areas (p < 0.05), independently on age. The level of socio-economic deprivation did not show a significant impact on the vital status, while a higher fatality was observed in male cases (p < 0.001), cases > 65 years (p < 0.001), cases having a connection with a nursing home (p < 0.05) or having at least 1 comorbidity (p < 0.001). On the other hand, a significant protection for healthcare workers was apparent (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that deprivation alone does not affect COVID-19 incidence and fatality burden, suggesting that the burden of disease is driven by a complexity of factors not yet fully understood. Better knowledge is needed to identify subgroups at higher risk and implement effective preventive strategies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inequidades en Salud , Pobreza , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , COVID-19/epidemiología , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Mortalidad , Clase SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: to describe the importance given to vaccination as a preventive measure in the clinical pathways (CPWs) of patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma in the Italian regional healthcare services. DESIGN: a comparative analysis was conducted to assess the presence/absence of vaccination recommendations among the available regional CPWs for the management of COPD and asthma. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all the regional CPWs for COPD and asthma available in the "Fondazione ReS" database between 2008 and 2019 have been analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the role attributed to vaccination was assessed in terms of type of recommended vaccinations, management step indicated for administration, vaccination schedules, healthcare professionals involved in the vaccination pathway, potential contraindications, use of indicators for the monitoring of the offer. RESULTS: thirteen CPWs for COPD and only 3 for asthma were published between 2008 and 2019. Twelve of the CPWs for COPD included recommendation for influenza vaccination, 11 of which including also pneumococcal vaccination. The most recent CPW also contained recommendations for measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, Herpes Zoster, and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccinations. Two of the CPWs related to asthma in adults recommended influenza vaccination. All CPWs provided for the vaccination recommendations during the patient follow-up step. CONCLUSIONS: Italian CPWs still pay little attention to the topic of vaccinations in patients with COPD and asthma. CPWs are required to be updated in the future being compliant with the national immunization schedule recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Vías Clínicas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Vacunación , Adulto , Humanos , Asma/epidemiología , Italia/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
West Nile virus (WNV) is a public health concern in Europe. Rising temperatures and the migration of potential vectors promote the spread of viruses to previously unaffected areas. In 2023, the Apulia region of Southern Italy experienced an unexpected increase in West Nile neuroinvasive disease (WNND); no such cases had been reported in the previous 10 years. Overall, eight autochthonous cases of WNV infection were identified between July and October 2023, six of which were WNND. All cases were male (median age, 73 years). Two of the cases were blood donors. All WNND cases were hospitalized and all recovered within a few weeks. Surveillance data showed that, in the Apulia region, WNV Lineage 2 was detected in humans, mosquitoes, and horses. Based on the number of WNND cases reported, we can assume that a high number of infections occurred during the summer period. Changes in the climate in the region over recent years could be considered among the main drivers of the rapid increase in WNV infections. Therefore, integrated surveillance should be strengthened to avoid the potential massive spread of WNV in Southern Italy. Moreover, the implementation of whole-genome sequencing of WNV strains, as well as seroepidemiological studies in the area, will facilitate a better understanding of circulation dynamics.
Asunto(s)
Fiebre del Nilo Occidental , Virus del Nilo Occidental , Humanos , Masculino , Animales , Caballos , Anciano , Femenino , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/epidemiología , Virus del Nilo Occidental/genética , Mosquitos Vectores , Italia/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)RESUMEN
Studies reporting vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 outcomes concentrate mainly on estimates of one single type of vaccine and variant, seldom considering waning effects. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of the overall COVID-19 vaccination programme implemented in the Apulia region of Italy at preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections, COVID-19-related hospital admissions and deaths during alpha and delta variant dominant periods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of persons 16 years and older resident in the Apulia region, assessing the effectiveness of the combined use of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines against confirmed COVID-19 infections, hospitalisations and deaths, for fully and partially vaccinated persons as well as by time since vaccination and variants. Cox regression models yielding hazard ratios were used to calculate the overall vaccination programme effectiveness. From 1 January to 1 December 2021, we included 3,530,967 eligible persons in the cohort, of whom 2,770,299 were fully vaccinated and 158,313 were COVID-19 positive at the end of the study period. The effectiveness of the programme over the entire study period for fully vaccinated persons against COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation and death were 87.69% (CI95% 87.73-88.18), 94.08% (93.58-94.54) and 95.95% (CI95% 95.26-96.54), respectively. The effectiveness against COVID-19 infection of fully vaccinated subjects during the alpha and delta period was respectively 88.20% (CI95% 87.60-99.78) and 59.31% (CI95% 57.91-60.67), against hospitalisation 93.89% (CI95% 92.67-94.90) and 88.32% (CI95% 86.50-89.90) and against death 93.83% (CI95% 91.65-95.45) and 85.91 (CI95% 79.98-90.09). The waning effects of the programme regarding COVID-19 infection during the delta period were stronger than for alpha, with 75.85% (CI95% 74.38-77.24) effectiveness after 1-2 months and 8.35% (CI95% 3.45-13.01) after 5-6 months after full vaccination. The effectiveness against hospitalisation and death during the delta period waned rapidly and at 7-8-months after the full vaccination respectively decreased to 27.67% (CI95% 7.48-43.45) and 48.47 (CI95% 53.97-34.82). Our study suggests that the COVID-19 vaccination program in Apulia was strongly protective against COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, and death due to alpha as well as delta variants, although its effectiveness is reduced over time.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ad26COVS1 , Vacuna BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Hospitalización , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
The ongoing outbreak of the Monkeypox virus (MPXV) is characterized by sustained human-to-human transmission, particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM). The aim of the study was to describe the characteristics of the MPXV infection identified in Southern Italy. Clinical samples for each suspected case identified from 1 June to 1 August 2022 were tested for MPXV, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on two strains. Ten cases were identified: eight were young adult males, including six MSMs, and two were female. Nine subjects reported recent sexual exposure. One female subject without sexual exposure only reported attendance at a social gathering. Overall, 7 of 10 skin lesion samples had a high viral load of MPXV DNA, and 6/9 whole blood samples and 6/8 nasopharyngeal swab samples also tested positive. The analyzed sequences belonged to Clade 3, lineage B.1, and B.1.5, respectively. Despite this recent multinational outbreak of MPXV cases having revealed a high proportion of cases occurring among MSM, the identification of cases among heterosexual subjects and in a female subject without sexual risk factors should raise awareness among clinicians about the possible spread of MPXV in the general population.
Asunto(s)
Mpox , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , ADN Viral , Femenino , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Mpox/epidemiología , Monkeypox virus/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: On January 9, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that Chinese health authorities had identified a new coronavirus strain never before isolated in humans, the 2019-nCoV later redefined SARS-CoV-2, that still today represent a public health problem. The present survey started on 10 February 2020 with the aim of a) assessing the risk perception in healthcare workers and young students, following the evolution of attitudes, perception and knowledge over time, b) provide useful information to the general population during survey. RESULTS: A study sample consisting of 4116 Italian individuals of both sexes was enrolled. High levels of risk perception, low perception of self-efficacy and low levels of knowledge scores (24.55 ± 5.76 SD) were obtained indicating the need for continuous population monitoring as well as further communication strategies carried out at institution levels. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study could help public health authorities in carrying out informative campaigns for general population and could be an important tool in evaluating public knowledge and misperceptions during the management of the COVID-19. (www.actabiomedica.it).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Epidemias , Actitud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We analysed hepatitis A (HepA) notifications and hospitalisations in Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden for available periods between 1995 and 2014. We aimed to investigate whether decreasing HepA incidence is associated with increasing age at infection and worsening HepA presentation and to identify groups at risk of severe disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 36 734 notified and 36 849 hospitalised patients. We used negative binomial regressions to identify over time: i) trends in hospitalisation and notification rates; ii) proportion of hospitalised and notified patients aged ≥40 years; iii) proportion of "severe hospitalisations"; and iv) risk factors for severe hospitalisation. RESULTS: During the study period both HepA notifications and hospitalisations decreased, with notification rates decreasing faster, patients aged ≥40 years increased, however, the proportion of severe HepA hospitalisations remained stable. Older patients and patients with comorbidities, particularly liver diseases, were more likely to experience severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: We used digitalised health information to confirm decreasing trends in HepA hospitalisations and notifications, and the increasing age of patients with HepA in Europe. We did not identify an increase in the severity of the clinical presentation of patients with HepA. Older patients with liver diseases are at increased risk of severe disease and should be prioritised for vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis A , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , VacunaciónRESUMEN
National immunisation programmes require an adequate supply of vaccines to function properly but many countries, globally and in Europe, have reported vaccine shortages. A comprehensive view of vaccine shortages and stockouts in the EU/EEA is missing in the published literature. This study was conducted in the framework of the European Joint Action on Vaccination (EU-JAV). Twenty-eight countries, including 20 EU-JAV consortium member states and an additional 8 EU/EEA countries, were invited to participate in a survey aimed at collecting information on vaccine shortages and stock-outs experienced from 2016 to 2019, their main causes, actions taken, and other aspects of vaccine supply. Twenty-one countries completed the survey (response rate 75%), of which 19 reported at least one shortage/stock-out event. Overall, 115 events were reported, 28 of which led to a change in the national immunisation programme. The most frequently involved vaccines were DT- and dT-containing combination vaccines, hepatitis B, hepatitis A, and BCG vaccines. The median duration of shortages/stock-outs was five months (range <1 month-39 months). Interruption in supply and global shortage were the most frequently indicated causes. Only about half of countries reported having an immunization supply chain improvement plan. Similarly, only about half of countries had recommendations or procedures in place to address shortages/stockouts. The survey also identified the occurrence of shortages/stockouts of other biological products (e.g. diphtheria antitoxin in 12 countries). Public health strategies to assure a stable and adequate vaccine supply for immunization programmes require coordinated actions from all stakeholders, harmonized definitions, strengthening of reporting and monitoring systems, the presence of an immunization supply chain improvement plan in all countries, and procedures or recommendations in place regarding the use of alternative vaccines or vaccination schedules in case of shortages/stockouts.
Asunto(s)
Salud Pública , Vacunación , Vacuna BCG , Europa (Continente) , Programas de Inmunización/métodosRESUMEN
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, asymptomatic transmission represented an important challenge for controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2 through the traditional public health strategies. Further understanding of the contribution of asymptomatic infections to SARS-CoV-2 transmission has been of crucial importance for pandemic control. We conducted a retrospective epidemiological study to characterize asymptomatic COVID-19 cases occurred in the Apulia region, Italy, during the first epidemic wave of COVID-19 outbreak (February 29-July 7, 2020). We analyzed data collected in a regional platform developed to manage surveillance activities, namely, investigation and follow-up of cases and contacts, contact tracing, and laboratory and clinical data collection. We included all asymptomatic cases that were laboratory-confirmed during the appropriate follow-up, defined as persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 who did not develop symptoms/clinical signs of the disease. Between February 29 and July 7, 2020, a total of 4,536 cases were diagnosed with COVID-19 among 193,757 tests performed. The group of persons with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection consisted of 903 cases; the asymptomatic proportion was 19.9% (95% CI: 18.8-21.1%); this decreased with increasing age (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96; p = 0.001), in individuals with underlying comorbidities (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73; p < 0.001), and in males (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.54-0.87; p = 0.002). The median asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive period was 19 days (IQR: 14-31) and the cumulative proportion of persons with resolution of infection 14 days after the first positive PCR test was 74%. As the public health community is debating the question of whether asymptomatic and late spreaders could sustain virus transmission in the communities, such cases present unique opportunities to gain insight into SARS-CoV-2 adaptation to human host. This has important implications for future COVID-19 surveillance and prevention.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Adaptación Fisiológica , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/transmisión , Trazado de Contacto , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , ARN Viral , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: From the initial stages of the pandemic in early 2020, COVID-19-related olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions have been widely reported and are emerging as one of the most frequent long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, data regarding the long-term recovery of the sense of smell and taste are lacking. This study aimed to characterize the evolution up to one year after the diagnosis of self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19 cases. METHODS: Based on the data of the active surveillance platform of the Apulia region, Italy, we selected the residents of Foggia district who were confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 from March 1st to June 16th, 2020, and home-quarantined with paucisymptomatic-to-mild clinical presentation. Self-reported olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions were recorded at baseline through a survey of dichotomous questions. The evolution of these symptoms at approximately one year was prospectively assessed via telephone by the validated sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22, Italian version). RESULTS: Among the 1,175 COVID-19 cases notified in the Foggia district during the first epidemic wave, 488 had paucisymptomatic-to-mild clinical presentation. Of these, 41.2% (n = 201, 95% confidence interval [CI] 36.8-45.7%) reported at least one sensory dysfunction. A total of 178 to 201 (88.5%) patients agreed to participate in the follow-up survey. According to the SNOT-22 results, the persistence of a sensory dysfunction was observed in the 29.8% (n = 53, 95% CI 23.2-37.1%) of them. Particularly, loss of smell persisted in 25.8% (n = 46, 95% CI 19.6-32.9%), loss of taste in 21.3% (n = 38, 95% CI 15.6-28.1%), loss of both in 17.4% (n = 31, 95% CI 12.2-23.8%) of participants in the follow-up. The rates of full recovery increased over time: from 59% at 30 days to 71.9% at 90 days for the sense of smell; from 61.3% at 30 days to 74.7% at 90 days for the sense of taste. CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of COVID-19-related olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions up to 12 months after the disease onset in a noteworthy proportion (approximately 3 out of 10) of patients with paucisymptomatic-to-mild clinical presentation deserves further investigations due to its possible pathophysiological implications and impact on the quality of life.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos del Olfato , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/epidemiología , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2 , Autoinforme , OlfatoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Data have suggested that SARS-CoV-2 infection causes an antibody response at least as strong as one BNT162b2 vaccine dose. Nevertheless, some aspects require further investigation to better understand the immunogenicity of one vaccine dose among infected individuals. Thus, we evaluated how previous SARS-CoV-2 infection may influence the humoral immunity after a single Pfizer BNT162b mRNA vaccine dose in a sample of healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: As part of the routine surveillance activity conducted among HCWs of the Policlinico Riuniti Foggia Hospital (Apulia region, Italy), we conducted a retrospective serosurvey in the period January-March 2021. We compared specific antibody titres (anti-spike IgGs measured by enzyme-linked immunoassay, ELISA) after SARS-CoV-2 infection and after the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, analysing the impact of sex, age, time since infection, and presence of symptoms on the humoral response. RESULTS: We included in the study 58 HCWs (mean age 44.1 years, 48.2% male) with anti-spike IgG titres available before and after the first BNT162b2 vaccine dose. Among these, we observed higher titres in previously infected cases (N = 21) than in COVID-19-naïve subjects (N = 37) (medians 1510 vs. 0.68; p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in anti-spike IgG titres was also observed among previously infected HCWs before vaccine dose in comparison with post-dose infection-naïve HCWs (medians 18.37 vs. 0.68, p < 0.001). Among infected individuals, no differences by sex, age, or time since infection were reported (p > 0.05). Post-dose titres of symptomatic and asymptomatic infected HCWs slightly differed (medians = 1900 vs. 1090; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Our data support the viable hypothesis of a single-dose vaccine regimen in individuals with a history of COVID-19, but no conclusion on duration of protection in this group can be drawn from our study.