Individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation (iPROVE-OLV): a multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether individualisation of the perioperative open-lung approach (OLA) to ventilation reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing lung resection. We compared a perioperative individualised OLA (iOLA) ventilation strategy with standard lung-protective ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised controlled trial enrolled patients scheduled for open or video-assisted thoracic surgery using one-lung ventilation in 25 participating hospitals in Spain, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, and Ecuador. Eligible adult patients (age ≥18 years) were randomly assigned to receive iOLA or standard lung-protective ventilation. Eligible patients (stratified by centre) were randomly assigned online by local principal investigators, with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Treatment with iOLA included an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre to 40 cm H2O of end-inspiratory pressure followed by individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrated to best respiratory system compliance, and individualised postoperative respiratory support with high-flow oxygen therapy. Participants allocated to standard lung-protective ventilation received combined intraoperative 4 cm H2O of PEEP and postoperative conventional oxygen therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of severe postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days, including atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy, severe respiratory failure, contralateral pneumothorax, early extubation failure (rescue with continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or reintubation), acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary infection, bronchopleural fistula, and pleural empyema. Due to trial setting, data obtained in the operating and postoperative rooms for routine monitoring were not blinded. At 24 h, data were acquired by an investigator blinded to group allocation. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182062, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 11, 2018, and June 14, 2022, we enrolled 1380 patients, of whom 1308 eligible patients (670 [434 male, 233 female, and three with missing data] assigned to iOLA and 638 [395 male, 237 female, and six with missing data] to standard lung-protective ventilation) were included in the final analysis. The proportion of patients with the composite outcome of severe postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days was lower in the iOLA group compared with the standard lung-protective ventilation group (40 [6%] vs 97 [15%], relative risk 0·39 [95% CI 0·28 to 0·56]), with an absolute risk difference of -9·23 (95% CI -12·55 to -5·92). Recruitment manoeuvre-related adverse events were reported in five patients. INTERPRETATION: Among patients subjected to lung resection under one-lung ventilation, iOLA was associated with a reduced risk of severe postoperative pulmonary complications when compared with conventional lung-protective ventilation. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the European Regional Development Funds.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Rediscovering an Old Cause of Myocardial Infarction.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an uncommon, but not insignificant cause of acute coronary syndrome that overwhelmingly affects middle-aged women. The pathophysiology of coronary dissection appears to be an outside-in mechanism, where the initiating event is not an intimal tear but rather the formation of an intramural hematoma, which compromises blood flow by reducing the arterial lumen. Considering this mechanism, it is clear to see how intracoronary imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound, are most accurate in the diagnosis. However, they carry a high rate of complications and are therefore generally avoided when the clinical scenario and angiographic appearance both support the diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. The natural history of the disease is toward healing of the vessel wall and restoration of blood flow. Therefore, conservative medical management is the preferred approach unless there are high-risk factors such as hemodynamic instability, signs of ischemia and severe proximal or multivessel lesions, in which percutaneous or surgical revascularization should be considered. Perioperative evaluation of these patients must take into account several aspects of this disease. Most of these patients will be receiving single or dual antiplatelet therapy, so one must consider the timing of the event and the surgical hemorrhagic risk when deciding to stop these therapies. Extracoronary vascular disease also must be assessed because it can have an effect on patient monitoring and risk of postoperative complications.

Is antivitamin K reversal required in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Antivitamin K agent (AVK) reversal in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT) is not defined in guidelines. We investigated the effect of reversion with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) on intraoperative transfusion, bleeding, and safety in LT patients on AVK. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 511 patients undergoing LT, we identified 25 patients treated with AVK (AVK group) and 13 patients with incidental portal vein thrombosis (PVT) without AVK (incidental PVT group). Fifty patients who underwent LT without PVT or AVK matched by age, model for end stage of liver disease (MELD), body mass index (BMI), and cirrhosis etiology were selected as the control group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and postoperative bleeding. In the AVK group, there were no differences between patients who received PCC and those who did not in intraoperative blood loss, red blood cells, fibrinogen, and platelet transfusion, or postoperative bleeding. PCC use had no effect on RBC transfusion in patients who had international normalized ratio or clotting time above versus below median values of the two parameters at baseline (2.3 and 103 s, respectively). No thrombotic events were detected in patients who received PCC. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that systematic administration of PCC to revert AVK prior to LT should be reconsidered.