Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 55: 102456, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32905888

RESUMEN

In spite of the growing use of the electrical impedance myography (EIM) measures for clinical assessment and follow-up of diseased muscle tissue, reliability studies are scarce. We evaluate the reliability of the (EIM) technique using four adhesive electrodes over the muscle of interest. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was studied within the same session and between sessions. Thirty-one healthy and volunteer subjects aged between 20 and 26 years were recruited. Phase angle, reactance and resistance were assessed for each EIM measurement. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the relative reliability. Absolute reliability was expressed as the standard error of measurement and the minimum detectable change. Relative reliability within the same session and between sessions for the EIM technique was excellent (ICCs > 0.9) concerning both intra- and inter-rater reliability, except for the component reactance. The absolute reliability was very high for the three EIM components. EIM measures using four adhesive electrodes over the area of interest is a reliable technique to assess muscle tissue status. This study confirms that these measurement results barely vary depending on the examiner and the moment. The present study also confirms phase angle as the least affected EIM component by examiner and evaluation moment.


Asunto(s)
Impedancia Eléctrica , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Miografía/instrumentación , Miografía/métodos , Cinta Quirúrgica , Adulto , Electrodos/normas , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Miografía/normas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Cinta Quirúrgica/normas , Adulto Joven
2.
J Clin Med ; 9(4)2020 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325637

RESUMEN

Poor performance in the 6-min walk test (6MWT < 350 m) is an important prognostic indicator of mortality and risk of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Little is known about the stability of this state over time and what factors might predict a poor 6MWT performance. To determine the stability of 6MWT performance over a 2-year period in COPD patients participating in annual medical follow-up visits, and to assess the ability of several clinical, pulmonary, and non-pulmonary factors to predict poor 6MWT performance, we prospectively included 137 patients with stable COPD (mean age, 66.9 ± 8.3 years). The 6MWT was scored at baseline and 2-year follow-up. To evaluate clinical, pulmonary, and non-pulmonary variables as potential predictors of poor 6MWT performance, we used multiple logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, weight, height, and 6MWT performance at baseline. Poor 6MWT performance was stable over 2 years for 67.4% of patients. Predictors of poor 6MWT performance included a five-repetition sit-to-stand test score ≤2 (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22-7.42), the percentage of mobility activities with limitations (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07), and poor 6MWT performance at baseline (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 1.88-11.43). Poor 6MWT performance status was stable for the majority of COPD patients. Lower scores on the five-repetition sit-to-stand test and a higher number of mobility activities with limitations were relevant predictors of poor 6MWT performance over 2 years. Prognostic models based on these non-pulmonary factors can provide non-inferior discriminative ability in comparison with prognostic models based on only pulmonary factors.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA