Significance of predicted future liver remnant volume on liver failure risk after major hepatectomy: a case matched comparative study.

Introduction: Future liver remnant volume (FLRV), a risk factor for liver failure (PHLF) after major hepatectomy (MH), is not routinely measured. This study aimed to evaluate the association between FLRV and PHLF. Patients and methods: All patients undergoing MH (4 + segments) between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained single-centre database. Perioperative data were collected for patients with PHLF, who were matched (1:2) with non-PHLF controls. FLRV and FLRV% (i.e., % of total liver volume) were calculated retrospectively from preoperative CT scans using Synapse-3D software, and compared between the PHLF and matched control groups. Results: Of 711 patients undergoing MH, PHLF occurred in 27 (3.8%), of whom 24 had preoperative CT scans available. These patients were matched to 48 non-PHLF controls, 98% of whom were classified as being at high risk of PHLF on preoperative risk scoring. FLRV% was significantly lower in the PHLF group, compared to matched controls (median: 28.7 vs. 35.2%, p = 0.010), with FLRV% < 30% in 58% and 29% of patients, respectively. Assessment of the ability of FLRV% to differentiate between PHLF and matched controls returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.69, and an optimal cut-off value of FLRV% < 31.5%, which yielded 79% sensitivity and 67% specificity. Conclusions: FLRV% is significantly predictive of PHLF after MH, with over half of patients with PHLF having FLRV% < 30%. In light of this, we propose that all patients should undergo risk stratification prior to MH, with the high risk patients additionally being assessed with CT volumetry.

Impact of Frailty on Short-Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is associated with improved short-term outcomes compared to open hepatectomy (OH), it is unknown whether frail patients also benefit from LH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of frailty on post-operative outcomes after LH and OH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent LH and OH between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified from a prospective database. Frailty was assessed using the modified Frailty Index (mFI), with patients scoring mFI ≥ 1 deemed to be frail. RESULTS: Of 1826 patients, 34.7% (N = 634) were frail and 18.6% (N = 340) were elderly (≥ 75 years). Frail patients had significantly higher 90-day mortality (6.6% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and post-operative complications (36.3% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001) than those who were not frail, effects that were independent of patient age on multivariate analysis. For those undergoing minor resections, the benefits of LH vs. OH were similar for frail and non-frail patients. Length of hospital stay was 53% longer in OH (vs. LH) in frail patients, compared to 58% longer in the subgroup of non-frail patients. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is independently associated with inferior post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, the benefits of laparoscopic (compared to open) hepatectomy are similar for frail and non-frail patients. Frailty should not be a contraindication to laparoscopic minor hepatectomy in carefully selected patients.

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is still unclear, and whether robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) offers benefits over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is unknown because large multicentre studies are lacking. This study compared perioperative outcomes between RDP and LDP. METHODS: A multicentre international propensity score-matched study included patients who underwent RDP or LDP for any indication in 21 European centres from six countries that performed at least 15 distal pancreatectomies annually (January 2011 to June 2019). Propensity score matching was based on preoperative characteristics in a 1 : 1 ratio. The primary outcome was the major morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or above). RESULTS: A total of 1551 patients (407 RDP and 1144 LDP) were included in the study. Some 402 patients who had RDP were matched with 402 who underwent LDP. After matching, there was no difference between RDP and LDP groups in rates of major morbidity (14.2 versus 16.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.378), postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (24.6 versus 26.5 per cent; P = 0.543) or 90-day mortality (0.5 versus 1.3 per cent; P = 0.268). RDP was associated with a longer duration of surgery than LDP (median 285 (i.q.r. 225-350) versus 240 (195-300) min respectively; P < 0.001), lower conversion rate (6.7 versus 15.2 per cent; P < 0.001), higher spleen preservation rate (81.4 versus 62.9 per cent; P = 0.001), longer hospital stay (median 8.5 (i.q.r. 7-12) versus 7 (6-10) days; P < 0.001) and lower readmission rate (11.0 versus 18.2 per cent; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The major morbidity rate was comparable between RDP and LDP. RDP was associated with improved rates of conversion, spleen preservation and readmission, to the detriment of longer duration of surgery and hospital stay.

Laparoscopic versus open extended radical left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international propensity-score matched study.

BACKGROUND: A radical left pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may require extended, multivisceral resections. The role of a laparoscopic approach in extended radical left pancreatectomy (ERLP) is unclear since comparative studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after laparoscopic vs open ERLP in patients with PDAC. METHODS: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study including patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open ERLP (L-ERLP; O-ERLP) for PDAC was performed (2007-2015). The ISGPS definition for extended resection was used. Primary outcomes were overall survival, margin negative rate (R0), and lymph node retrieval. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2015, 320 patients underwent ERLP in 34 centers from 12 countries (65 L-ERLP vs. 255 O-ERLP). After propensity-score matching, 44 L-ERLP could be matched to 44 O-ERLP. In the matched cohort, the conversion rate in L-ERLP group was 35%. The L-ERLP R0 resection rate (matched cohort) was comparable to O-ERLP (67% vs 48%; P = 0.063) but the lymph node yield was lower for L-ERLP than O-ERLP (median 11 vs 19, P = 0.023). L-ERLP was associated with less delayed gastric emptying (0% vs 16%, P = 0.006) and shorter hospital stay (median 9 vs 13 days, P = 0.005), as compared to O-ERLP. Outcomes were comparable for additional organ resections, vascular resections (besides splenic vessels), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications, or 90-day mortality (2% vs 2%, P = 0.973). The median overall survival was comparable between both groups (19 vs 20 months, P = 0.571). Conversion did not worsen outcomes in L-ERLP. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach may be used safely in selected patients requiring ERLP for PDAC, since morbidity, mortality, and overall survival seem comparable, as compared to O-ERLP. L-ERLP is associated with a high conversion rate and reduced lymph node yield but also with less delayed gastric emptying and a shorter hospital stay, as compared to O-ERLP.

Multicentre observational cohort study of implementation and outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is increasingly being performed as an alternative to open surgery. Whether the implementation and corresponding learning curve of LDP have an impact on patient outcome is unknown. The aim was to investigate the temporal trends in practice across UK centres. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of LDP in 11 tertiary referral centres in the UK between 2006 and 2016. The learning curve was analysed by pooling data for the first 15 consecutive patients who had LDP and examining trends in surgical outcomes in subsequent patients. RESULTS: In total, 570 patients underwent LDP, whereas 888 underwent open resection. For LDP the median duration of operation was 240 min, with 200 ml blood loss. The conversion rate was 12·1 per cent. Neuroendocrine tumours (26·7 per cent) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (19·7 per cent) were commonest indications. The proportion of LDPs increased from 24·4 per cent in 2006-2009 (P1) to 46·0 per cent in 2014-2016 (P3) (P < 0·001). LDP was increasingly performed for patients aged 70 years or more (16 per cent in P1 versus 34·4 per cent in P3; P = 0·002), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (6 versus 19·1 per cent; P = 0·005) and advanced malignant tumours (27 versus 52 per cent; P = 0·016). With increasing experience, there was a trend for a decrease in blood transfusion rate (14·1 per cent for procedures 1-15 to 3·5 per cent for procedures 46-75; P = 0·008), ICU admissions (32·7 to 19·2 per cent; P = 0·021) and median duration of hospital stay (7 (i.q.r. 5-9) to 6 (4-7) days; P = 0·002). After 30 procedures, a decrease was noted in rates of both overall morbidity (57·7 versus 42·2 per cent for procedures 16-30 versus 46-75 respectively; P = 0·009) and severe morbidity (18·8 versus 9·7 per cent; P = 0·031). CONCLUSION: LDP has increased as a treatment option for lesions of the distal pancreas as indications for the procedure have expanded. Perioperative outcomes improved with the number of procedures performed.

ANTECEDENTES: Cada día se utiliza más la pancreatectomía distal laparoscópica (laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, LDP) como una alternativa a la cirugía abierta. Se desconoce si la implementación y la correspondiente curva de aprendizaje de la LDP tienen impacto en los resultados. El objetivo fue investigar las tendencias relacionadas con su implementación en los centros del Reino Unido a los largo del tiempo. MÉTODOS: Se realizó el estudio observacional retrospectivo y multicéntrico de una cohorte de LDP en once centros de referencia terciarios del Reino Unido entre 2006-2016. Se analizó la curva de aprendizaje agrupando los 15 primeros pacientes consecutivos de LDP y se compararon los resultados quirúrgicos con los obtenidos en los pacientes subsiguientes. RESULTADOS: En total, se incluyeron 570 pacientes con LDP y 888 con resección abierta. Para el LDP, la mediana de tiempo operatorio fue de 240 minutos con 200 ml de pérdida de sangre. La tasa de conversión fue del 12,2%. Las indicaciones más frecuentes fueron los tumores neuroendocrinos (26,7%) y las neoplasias quísticas mucinosas (19,7%). La proporción de LDP aumentó del 24% al 46% (de 2006-2009 a 2014-2016; P < 0,001). La LDP se realizó cada vez con mayor frecuencia en pacientes de ≥ 70 años (15,8% versus 34,4%, P = 0,002), en pacientes con adenocarcinoma ductal pancreático (6,5% versus 19,1%, P = 0,005) y en pacientes con tumores malignos avanzados (27,3% versus 51,85%, P = 0,016). Con el aumento de la experiencia, disminuyeron las tendencias de la tasa de transfusión sanguínea (14,1% al 3,5%, P = 0,008), los ingresos en la UCI (32,7% a 19,2%, P = 0.021) y la mediana de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (7 (rango intercuartílico 5-9) a 6 (rango intercuartilico 4-7) días, P = 0,002). Tras 30 procedimientos, disminuyeron tanto la morbilidad global (57,7% versus 42,2%, P = 0,009) como las tasas de morbilidad grave (21,5% versus 14,6%, P = 0,022). CONCLUSIÓN: La pancreatectomía distal laparoscópica se ha incrementado como una opción de tratamiento para las lesiones del páncreas distal a medida que se han ido ampliando las indicaciones del procedimiento. Los resultados perioperatorios mejoran con el número de procedimientos realizados.

Evaluation of the clinical and economic impact of delays to surgery in patients with periampullary cancer.

Background: Early treatment is the only potential cure for periampullary cancer. The pathway to surgery is complex and involves multiple procedures across local and specialist hospitals. The aim of this study was to analyse variability within this pathway, and its impact on cost and outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for periampullary cancer (2011-2016) were identified retrospectively and their pathway to surgery was analysed. Patients who had early surgery (shortest quartile, Q1) were compared with those having late surgery (longest quartile, Q4). Results: A total of 483 patients were included in the study, with 121 and 124 patients in Q1 and Q4 respectively. The median time from initial CT to surgery was 21 days for Q1 versus 112 days for Q4 (P < 0·001). Diagnostic delays were common in Q4; these patients required significantly more investigations than those in Q1 (endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS): 74·2 versus 18·2 per cent respectively, P < 0·001; MRI: 33·6 versus 20·6 per cent, P = 0·036). The median time to diagnostic EUS was 13 days in Q1 versus 59 days in Q4 (P < 0·001). Some 42·1 per cent of jaundiced patients in Q1 underwent preoperative biliary drainage, compared with all patients in Q4. There were significantly more unplanned admissions and associated longer duration of hospital stay per patient and costs in Q4 than in Q1 (median: 8 versus 3 days respectively; €5652 versus €2088; both P < 0·001). There was a higher likelihood of potentially curative surgery in Q1 (82·6 per cent versus 66·9 per cent in Q4; P = 0·005). Conclusion: There is wide variation across the entire pathway, suggesting that multiple strategies are required to enable early surgery. Defining an effective pathway by anticipating the need for investigations and avoiding biliary drainage reduces unplanned admissions and costs and increases resection rates.

Propensity-matched analysis of the influence of perioperative statin therapy on outcomes after liver resection.

Background: Perioperative use of statins is reported to improve postoperative outcomes after cardiac and non-cardiovascular surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of statins on postoperative outcomes including complications of grade IIIa and above, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), and 90-day mortality rates after liver resection. Methods: Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed to identify statin users and non-users (controls). Propensity matching was conducted for age, BMI, type of surgery and preoperative co-morbidities to compare subgroups. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for the following outcomes: 90-day mortality, significant postoperative complications and PHLF. Results: Of 890 patients who had liver resection during the study period, 162 (18·2 per cent) were taking perioperative statins. Propensity analysis selected two matched groups, each comprising 154 patients. Overall, 81 patients (9·1 per cent) developed complications of grade IIIa or above, and the 90-day mortality rate was 3·4 per cent (30 patients), with no statistically significant difference when the groups were compared before and after matching. The rate of PHLF was significantly lower in patients on perioperative statins than in those not taking statins (10·5 versus 17·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·033); similar results were found after propensity matching (10·4 versus 20·8 per cent respectively; P = 0·026). Conclusion: The rate of PHLF was significantly lower in patients taking perioperative statins, but there was no statistically significant difference in severe complications and mortality rates.

Management of a pseudo-aneurysm in the hepatic artery after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Introduction Symptomatic hepatic-artery pseudoaneurysm (HAP) after bile-duct injury (BDI) is a rare complication with a varied (but clinically urgent) presentation. Methods A prospectively maintained database of all patients with BDI at laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) referred to a tertiary specialist hepatobiliary centre between 1992 and 2011 was searched systematically to identify patients with a symptomatic HAP. Care and outcome of these patients was studied. Results Eight (6 men) of 236 patients with BDI (3.4%) with a median age of 65 (range: 54?6) years presented with symptomatic HAP. Median time of presentation of the HAP from the index LC was 31 (range: 13?16) days. Bleeding was the dominant presentation in 7 patients. One patient presented late (>2 years) with abdominal pain alone. Computed tomography angiography was the most useful investigation. Angioembolisation was successful in 7 patients. One patient died, and another patient developed liver infarction. Three patients (38%) developed biliary strictures after embolisation. Seven patients are alive and well at a median follow-up of 66 months. Conclusions Presentation of HAP is often delayed. A high index of suspicion is necessary for the diagnosis. Computed tomography angiography is the first-line investigation and selective angioembolisation can yield successful outcomes.

Comparison of preoperative CT-based imaging parameters to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula.

AIM: To review all reported methods of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in one patient cohort and to identify which were the strongest to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included if they had unenhanced CT images for review. Eighteen variables and two scores were tested. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were explored. RESULTS: POPF affected 26 of 107 patients (24.3%). Nine variables were significantly related to POPF with pancreatic duct width having the largest area under the ROC curve (AUROC; 0.808, p<0.001). An obese body habitus was associated with POPF with six of nine related variables using data from CT images associated with POPF; of these intra-abdominal wall thickness yielded the largest AUROC (0.713, p=0.001). This corresponded to the finding that body mass index (BMI) was related to POPF (AUROC 0.705, p=0.002). The largest AUROC of all was associated with one of the predictive scores (0.828, p<0.001). Substituting BMI for intra-abdominal wall thickness in this score yielded a non-significant increase to predict POPF (AUROC 0.840, p=0.676). None of the assessments of organ density (in Hounsfield Units) were associated with POPF. CONCLUSION: Data from preoperative CT imaging provides valuable information regarding a patient's risk of POPF. Obesity as assessed by CT images strongly relates to POPF, but the largest single risk factor for POPF is a narrow pancreatic duct.

Performance of the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classifications for severity in acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Severity classification systems aim to stratify patients with acute pancreatitis reliably into coherent risk groups. Recently, the Atlanta 1992 classification has been revised (Atlanta 2012) and a novel determinant-based classification (DBC) system developed. This study assessed the ability of the three systems to stratify disease severity among patients with acute pancreatitis. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of patients with acute pancreatitis identified from an institutional database. Cohort characteristics, investigations, interventions and outcomes were identified. Systems were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 6·6 per cent (15 of 228 patients). All of the outcomes considered correlated significantly with the three systems, with the exception of the need for surgery in Atlanta 1992. Atlanta 2012 and the DBC had higher area under the curve (AUC) values than Atlanta 1992 for all outcomes. The revised Atlanta and DBC systems both performed similarly with regard to ICU admission (AUC 0·927 and 0·917 respectively; both P < 0·001), need for percutaneous drainage (AUC 0·879 and 0·891; both P < 0·001), need for surgery (AUC 0·827 and 0·845; P = 0·006 and P = 0·004 respectively) and in-hospital mortality (0·955 and 0·931; both P < 0·001). However, the critical category in the DBC system identified patients with the most severe disease; seven of eight patients in this group died in hospital, compared with 15 of 34 with severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta 2012. CONCLUSION: The Atlanta 2012 and DBC perform equally well for classification of disease severity in acute pancreatitis. The addition of a critical category in the DBC identifies patients with the most severe disease.

Outcome following Resection of Biliary Cystadenoma: A Single Centre Experience and Literature Review.

Background. Biliary cystadenomas (BCAs) are rare, benign, potentially malignant cystic lesions of the liver, accounting for less than 5% of cystic liver tumours. We report the outcome following resection of biliary cystadenoma from a single tertiary centre. Methods. Data of patients who had resection of BCA between January 1993 and July 2014 were obtained from liver surgical database. Patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcome were analysed. Results. 29 patients had surgery for BCA. Male : female ratio was 1 : 28. Clinical presentation was abdominal pain (74%), jaundice (20%), abdominal mass (14%), and deranged liver function tests (3%). Cyst characteristics included septations (48%), wall thickening (31%), wall irregularity (38%), papillary projections (10%), and mural nodule (3%). Surgical procedures included atypical liver resection (52%), left hemihepatectomy (34%), right hemihepatectomy (10%), and left lateral segmentectomy (3%). Median length of stay was 7 (IQ 6.5-8.5) days. Two patients developed postoperative bile leak. No patients had malignancy on final histology. Median follow-up was 13 (IQ 6.5-15.7) years. One patient developed delayed biliary stricture and one died of cholangiocarcinoma 11 years later. Conclusion. Biliary cystadenomas can be resected safely with significantly low morbidity. Malignant transformation and recurrence are rare. Complete surgical resection provides a cure.

Pinworm infection masquerading as colorectal liver metastasis.

Enterobius vermicularis is responsible for a variety of diseases but rarely affects the liver. Accurate characterisation of suspected liver metastases is essential to avoid unnecessary surgery. In the presented case, following a diagnosis of rectal cancer, a solitary liver nodule was diagnosed as a liver metastasis due to typical radiological features and subsequently resected. At pathological assessment, however, a necrotic nodule containing E. vermicularis was identified. Solitary necrotic nodules of the liver are usually benign but misdiagnosed frequently as malignant due to radiological features. It is standard practice to diagnose colorectal liver metastases solely on radiological evidence. Without obtaining tissue prior to liver resection, misdiagnosis of solitary necrotic nodules of the liver will continue to occur.

Klatskin-like lesions.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma, also known as Klatskin tumour, is the commonest type of cholangiocarcinoma. It poses unique problems in the diagnosis and management because of its anatomical location. Curative surgery in the form of major hepatic resection entails significant morbidity. About 5-15% of specimens resected for presumed Klatskin tumour prove not to be cholangiocarcinomas. There are a number of inflammatory, infective, vascular, and other pathologies, which have overlapping clinical and radiological features with a Klatskin tumour, leading to misinterpretation. This paper aims to summarise the features of such Klatskin-like lesions that have been reported in surgical literature.

Outcome following mesenteric artery revascularisation for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to review the clinical presentation and diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) and to evaluate the early results and late outcome of mesenteric revascularisation. METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 patients with CMI diagnosed between January 2000 and September 2006. Mesenteric revascularisation was done using either transluminal angioplasty, stenting, endarterectomy or bypass graft. Patients were followed up with Duplex scan and/or computed tomographic angiogram to confirm graft patency. RESULTS: Sixteen revascularisation procedures were done in 15 patients. Aorto-superior mesenteric artery (SMA) bypass in 9 patients, SMA endarterectomy in 2 patients, transluminal angioplasty in 2 patients, stenting in 2 patients and right common iliac to common hepatic artery bypass in 1 patient with previous failed aorto-SMA graft. There were no perioperative deaths or early procedural complication. Two patients had late graft thrombosis and symptomatic recurrence. One of the three late deaths was due to graft thrombosis and bowel infarction, and the other two died of acute myocardial infarction and disseminated bronchogenic carcinoma respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that mesenteric revascularisation for CMI is successful for most patients with symptomatic relief, low mortality and a good long term graft patency.

Liver resection for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of prognostic factors.

AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the outcome following hepatic resection for metastatic STS and to identify factors predicting survival. METHODS: All patients who underwent hepatic resection for metastatic STS between August 1997 and April 2009 were included. The data was obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Patients' demographics, clinico-pathological parameters, overall survival and the factors predicting survival were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent hepatic resection for metastasis, with a median age of 58 years. The predominant site of primary tumour was the gastro-intestinal tract (50%). Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological type (54%). The median interval between the primary and metastatic resections was 17 months. Thirteen patients had synchronous tumours. 24 patients had major liver resections and 10 patients had bi-lobar disease. The median number of liver lesions resected was 1(1-6) and the median maximum diameter was 11 cm (1-26 cm). R0 resection was performed in 31 patients. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival from the time of metastasectomy was 90.3%, 48.0% and 31.8% respectively, with a median survival of 24 months. Factors associated with poor survival on univariate analysis were the presence of high grade tumours (p = 0.04), primary leiomyosarcoma (p = 0.01) and positive resection margin of liver metastasis (p = 0.04), whilst multivariate analysis predicted primary leiomyosarcoma as a risk factor for poor survival (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hepatic resection for metastatic STS appears to be valuable in carefully selected patients with acceptable long-term survival. The aim of surgery must be an R0 resection to offer a chance of cure.

Delayed presentation of diaphragmatic rupture as intra-thoracic gastric volvulus.

Diaphragmatic injuries are quite rare and result from either blunt or penetrating trauma. They are not always recognized at the time of injury and there is often a delay between the trauma and the diagnosis The diagnosis is confirmed by chest X-ray, USG, CT Scan and barium studies This case report discusses the delayed presentation of diaphragmatic rupture as an intrathoracic gastric volvulus observed in a 36-year-old man.