Unroofing of Lower Pole Native Kidney Cysts in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidneys at the Time of Kidney Transplantation.

To report our experience with unroofing of ipsilateral lower pole kidney cysts in five patients with adult-type polycystic kidneys [ADPKD] when free implantation of kidney allograft interfered with lower pole native kidney cysts. In all of these patients, the native kidneys extended to the ipsilateral pelvis and bilateral ADPKD caused enlargement of the abdomen on gross examination. Unroofing of lower pole kidney cysts was performed during the same session of allograft transplantation. The decision to unroof lower pole cysts of the ipsilateral kidney was made after observing interference of lower pole cysts with free implantation of the allograft. In patient A, bilateral native nephrectomy was performed 6 weeks after kidney transplantation after consultation with the patient, when there was evidence of the good function of the allograft and the recipient was on a low dose of immunosuppressive medications. In other patients, no need for native nephrectomy observed. This experience suggests the possibility that when large ipsilateral kidney cysts interfere with safe implantation of the allograft, there is an option of performing cyst unroofing at the same session and proceeding with allograft implantation. In many patients, there would be no need for native nephrectomy and of deemed necessary, it will be performed later, when there is evidence of the good function of the allograft and the patient is on good kidney function with a low dose of immunosuppressive medications and a less risk profile for the operation. To our best knowledge, there is no prior such report in the literature.

Comparing the Frequency of Lymphoceles Which Needed Intervention in Recipients of Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the frequency of lymphoceles that needed intervention in recipients who received kidneys from living versus deceased donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent kidney transplantation at the Labbafinejad Hospital from 2012 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the incidence of lymphoceles that needed intervention for management. RESULTS: From March 2012 to April 2021, 1752 patients received kidney transplantation in Labbafinejad Hospital including 975 transplantations from living donors and 777 transplantations from deceased donors. Symptomatic lymphoceles were observed postoperatively in 23 patients. Symptoms included compressive effect on the ureter, hydroureteronephrosis of the transplanted kidney, frequency, urinary retention, infection,  abdominal discomfort, or rise in serum creatinine. Out of 23 patients who needed intervention for symptomatic lymphocele, 15 patients were recipients of living donors and 8 patients were recipients of deceased donors [1.53% versus 1.03%, P=.40]. Intervention consisted of open surgical drainage in 6 patients [4 recipients of living donors and 2 recipients of deceased donors], and nephrostomy insertion in 17 patients. Open operation was necessary in 5 (47%) patients in whom arterial anastomosis was made to the internal iliac artery versus 1 (9%) patient in whom the anastomosis was not made to the internal iliac artery (P=0.15). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic lymphoceles which needed intervention were observed in low frequency (1.31%). Most cases can be managed by endoscopic drainage without relapse. Type of donation had no relationship with the need for open or endoscopic intervention in lymphoceles. A higher proportion of open surgeries to control lymphocele were observed in recipients in whom the internal iliac artery was used for arterial anastomosis however the difference was not statistically significant.