Management of the pediatric burn patient.

The care of children with burns represents a therapeutic dilemma for many practitioners who periodically work with thermally injured patients. In this article, the authors emphasize the pathophysiology of thermal injury with special attention to the burned child. Within this framework, pain control, resuscitation, wound care, and the importance of a "burn care team" are discussed as important factors in the care of these children.

Acetaminophen in the management of background pain in children post-burn.

This retrospective review evaluated the pain management of 395 acutely burned pediatric patients who were treated by a pain management protocol emphasizing acetaminophen as the initial medication to control background pain. Pain was assessed by using standardized instruments based on observations by patients, nurses, and parents. Morphine was added when scheduled acetaminophen (10-15 mg/kg/4 hr) did not control background pain. Fifty percent of the children received only acetaminophen to control background pain. Younger children and children with the smallest burns, regardless of age, were likely to be managed with acetaminophen alone. Most peak serum concentrations of acetaminophen were less than 10 micrograms/mL. When needed, children also received medication for painful procedures, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. These additional medications were not more frequently given to children receiving only acetaminophen for background pain. These data suggest that acetaminophen is a safe, useful medication for the control of post-burn background pain in some children.

Pain assessment from patients with burns and their nurses.

We investigated pain experienced during burn wound debridement. Forty-nine adult patients with burns and 27 nurses submitted 123 pairs of visual analog scale pain ratings for burn wound debridements. While patients' overall visual analog scale pain scores were found to be evenly distributed, worst pain scores yielded a bimodal distribution with groups centered around means of 2.0 (low pain group) and 7.0 (high pain group). Low and high pain groups did not differ in age, sex, or total body surface area burned. Patient and nurse pain ratings were found to be highly correlated. According to one researcher's criteria, 53% of nurse pain ratings were accurate. Accuracy of nurses' ratings was unrelated to nursing experience or educational level. Future strategies are presented for comparing high and low pain groups and increasing nurse pain rating accuracy.

Psychological effects of severe burn injuries.

Severe burn injuries provide researchers with an opportunity to study the effects of painful but usually transient trauma on psychological functioning. To that end, this article presents a review of the 3 main areas of this body of literature: (a) premorbid characteristics of people who sustain severe burn injuries, (b) psychological reactions during hospitalization, and (c) long-term adjustment. The general implications of these studies are discussed and then used to illuminate the circumstances under which individuals suffer the most from this type of trauma, the effects of such injuries on personality function, and how meaningful units of measurements can be defined. Potential clinical applications are also described.

Burn nursing Delphi study: pain management.

In 1989 a Delphi study was undertaken to identify the nursing priorities in burn research. The Delphi technique is a series of questionnaires used to reach consensus. Ninety-four nurses involved in burn care completed four rounds of questionnaires containing 101 research questions. This, the seventh and final report, concerns a significant area of burn research, which is pain management. Eleven (10%) of the 101 questions dealt with pain, whereas five were rated among the top 20 priority questions. As a category the questions concerning pain management had a mean score of 5.91 on a 0 to 7 Likert scale. The questions collectively were cited as having the most impact on the welfare of the patient with burns.

Hypnosis for the treatment of burn pain.

The clinical utility of hypnosis for controlling pain during burn wound debridement was investigated. Thirty hospitalized burn patients and their nurses submitted visual analog scales (VAS) for pain during 2 consecutive daily wound debridements. On the 1st day, patients and nurses submitted baseline VAS ratings. Before the next day's would debridement, Ss received hypnosis, attention and information, or no treatment. Only hypnotized Ss reported significant pain reductions relative to pretreatment baseline. This result was corroborated by nurse VAS ratings. Findings indicate that hypnosis is a viable adjunct treatment for burn pain. Theoretical and practical implications and future research directions are discussed.

Research priorities for burn nursing: rehabilitation, discharge planning, and follow-up care.

Fourteen of the 101 research questions that were proposed in the Burn Nursing Delphi study by Marvin et al. (J Burn Care Rehabil 1991;12:190-7) were concerned with the rehabilitation, discharge planning, and follow-up care of patients with burns. Questions that were ranked as top priorities for patient welfare related to control of postburn itching, prevention of contractures, and effective means of community-based follow-up to meet physical, social, and emotional needs of patients and families. Burn nurses identified the study of nursing interventions that are the most effective means for preparing patients, families, and community nurses for posthospitalization care as the research priority that has the greatest potential impact on the profession of burn nursing. Respondents to the Delphi study favored a collaborative approach to research for most of the questions in the rehabilitation subgroup. Suggestions are made for nurses who wish to take the lead in designing and implementing qualitative and quantitative studies that relate to the increasingly prevalent problems that are encountered by survivors of burn injury.

Research priorities for burn nursing: report on physiologic issues.

This Delphi study was designed and conducted to identify the issues of greatest concern to care of patients with burns and to the profession of burn nursing, so that nursing research could be directed toward these ends. One hundred and one questions were prioritized by the 94 participants who completed the four sequential rounds of questionnaires. A total of 11 questions (10.9%), which addressed physiologic-based issues, were identified.

Research priorities for burn nursing: nursing recruitment, retention, and other administrative issues.

This Delphi study was designed to identify nursing research priorities. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires that contained 101 potential research questions. Twenty questions addressed nursing administrative issues. In this category, the highest priority for potential impact on patient welfare related to the cost-effectiveness of various infection control measures. Questions concerning recruitment, retention, staffing, and cost/quality issues had the highest priority for research that could have an impact on the profession of nursing.

Research priorities for burn nursing: report of the psychosocial issues group.

This study was designed to identify nursing research priorities in burn care. The Delphi technique of sequential questionnaires was used for data collection. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires. One hundred and one research questions were identified, and priorities were assigned according to their impact on patient welfare and on the profession of burn nursing. Twenty-two of these research questions concerned psychosocial issues. This group of questions was then analyzed for priority research issues. The top five ranked questions in the psychosocial issues group for impact on patient welfare concerned: (1) stress reduction techniques, (2) social reentry strategies, (3) management of psychosis and post-traumatic stress disorder, (4) strategies to assist patients with impaired communication capabilities, and (5) the role of recovered burn survivors in encouraging patient compliance with treatments. Similarly, the top five ranked questions for impact on the profession of burn nursing concerned: (1) stress reduction strategies, (2) coping techniques for burn survivors, (3) management of psychosis and post-traumatic stress disorder, (4) nursing's supportive role in regard to "do not resuscitate" orders, and (5) coping strategies to be used with patients who express a desire to die.

Research priorities for burn nursing: patient, nurse, and burn prevention education.

Fifteen of the 101 research questions that were assigned priorities in the Burn Nursing Delphi study by Marvin et al. (Marvin JA, Carrougher GJ, Bayley EW, Weber B, Knighton J, Rutan RL. Burn nursing Delphi study: setting research priorities. J BURN CARE REHABIL 1991;12:190-7) addressed education from the perspectives of patients, their families, and burn nurses; the study also addressed the issue of burn prevention education. Questions concerning patient education were assigned the highest priority in this education subgroup with respect to the potential for research that would have an impact on patient welfare. The question that rated highest as a priority for its potential impact on the profession of burn nursing addressed the core competencies needed for safe and effective burn nursing practice. Prevention education was generally found to be a low priority in the Delphi study. Many of the questions in the education subgroup can best be answered by comparative or experimental studies designed to explain and predict the effects of various teaching strategies on behavioral outcomes. Research on patient, nurse, and burn prevention education provides a fertile ground for nurse researchers and an opportunity to contribute knowledge of vital importance to clinicians, educators, managers, and the public.

Research priorities for burn nursing. Report of the Wound Care and Infection Control Group.

This study was designed to identify research priorities in burn nursing. The Delphi technique of sequential questionnaires was used for data collection. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires. One hundred one research questions were identified and prioritized according to impact on the welfare of patients with burns and impact on the profession of burn nursing. Twenty-three of these research questions concerned issues of wound care or infection control. This group of questions was further analyzed to determine priority research issues. The five most highly ranked questions in the category of wound care/infection control with regard to impact on patient welfare concerned healing of donor sites and skin grafts, wound cleansing, and the effect of pressure garments on wound healing. Similarly, the five most highly ranked questions with regard to impact on the profession of burn nursing concerned the impact of combining patients with burns and patients without burns in the same unit, healing of donor sites and skin grafts, care of the patient with burns who also has acquired immune deficiency syndrome, infection control, and dressing of the burn wound.

Infection control in a burn center.

No consensus has been reached on the ideal isolation technique to prevent hospital-acquired infection in the patient with burns. This study reports four 2-month consecutive periods of microbial surveillance in a burn center intensive care unit. Phase I, the first period of surveillance, demonstrated a unit-acquired colonization rate of 63%, with the marker organisms appearing at 4 to 8 days. Direct observation of isolation technique showed a 51% error rate. A mandatory educational session reviewing the high colonization rates, observed breaks in isolation technique, and principles of infection control failed to decrease the colonization rates as measured in phase II. A simplified isolation technique was adopted, which led to a decrease in unit-acquired colonization, from 63% to 33% in phase III from phase I values (p = 0.0514); and to a significant delay in inception, from 7.8 to 21 days, in those colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p less than 0.05). The simplified isolation technique decreased isolation costs over a 6-month period from $53,000 to $30,000. To confirm the decrease colonization rates from phase I to phase III, a fourth 2-month surveillance period was undertaken 6 months later. Phase IV demonstrated similar results to those of phase III.

Treatment of postextubation stridor in a pediatric patient with burns: the role of heliox.

Stridor is a common problem in patients with burns after extubation, especially in children and in those with facial burns or airway injuries. The usual treatments for severe respiratory distress, such as reintubation and tracheotomy, carry substantial risks for patients. We report our successful treatment of severe postextubation stridor in a 7-year-old patient with burns with the administration of heliox in addition to more traditional therapies, review the literature about the use of heliox in postextubation stridor, and suggest cases in which its use may prevent the need for more hazardous interventions.

Determinants of donor site infections in small burn grafts.

Studies indicate no advantage to the early use of systemic antibiotics in patients with burns, but the use of prophylactic antibiotics during excision is still being questioned. The records of 213 patients who required excision and who had less than 20% total body surface area burned were reviewed. We investigated risk factors associated with donor- and graft-site infections and whether or not perioperative antibiotics influenced the incidence of infections. Statistically significant increases in donor-site infections occurred when patients did not receive perioperative antibiotics, when the excision was large, and when the time between injury and excision was prolonged. Age, burn size, or type of dressing did not influence the development of infections. A risk of graft infections in those patients who were not receiving perioperative antibiotics existed, but it was not significant. The time between injury and excision and the actual size of the excision influence the development of donor-site infections. However, perioperative antibiotics seem to decrease the risk of these infections.

Effectiveness of nalbuphine for relief of burn debridement pain.

A prospective double-blind study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of the agonist-antagonist nalbuphine hydrochloride with morphine sulfate in relieving pain from burn debridement. The study consisted of two groups in which each was given a preprocedure dose of the study medication followed by administration of incremental doses up to one half the initial dose as requested. After reviewing the literature, we set the ratio of nalbuphine hydrochloride/morphine sulfate at 2:1 mg, respectively. Safety and efficacy were determined by measurements of vital signs, sedation, adverse effects, and patient evaluation of pain intensity and relief with the use of both an adjective and a visual analogue scale. Analysis showed no significant differences in the variables measured. Therefore in relieving burn debridement pain, we found nalbuphine hydrochloride to be as effective as morphine sulfate. We also found that respiratory depression was not a problem in either group.