Health-Related Quality of Life Burden Among Adults with Vitiligo: Relationship to Disease Severity and Disease Location.

INTRODUCTION: Vitiligo was historically regarded as a cosmetic disorder; however, it is an autoimmune disease. As a visible condition, it affects patient well-being. We assessed the impact of disease severity, lesion location, and body surface area (BSA) affected on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Retrospective data were from the Adelphi Real World Vitiligo Disease Specific Programme: a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with vitiligo (10/2021-07/2022). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by the Vitiligo-Specific Quality of Life Instrument (VitiQoL), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and EQ-5D-5L. The Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) questionnaire was used to assess disease-related impairment of daily activities. Data were stratified by physician-reported disease severity, presence/absence of vitiligo on the face, and BSA percentage affected. RESULTS: In total, 1388 patients were included. Mean (SD) VitiQoL, HADS depression, and anxiety scores were higher for those with severe disease [40.5 (26.1), 5.2 (4.4), and 6.8 (4.7)] than those with mild [24.8 (18.8), 3.6 (3.8), 4.2 (3.8)] or moderate [27.1 (22.6), 3.8 (4.5), 4.3 (4.4)] disease. Patients with face affected reported higher VitiQoL [30.0 (22.3) versus 23.2 (19.3)], and HADS scores [depression, 4.3 (4.3) versus 3.2 (3.9); anxiety, 5.0 (4.3) versus 3.8 (3.9)] than those without. Patients with ≥ 5% BSA affected had higher VitiQoL, depression and anxiety scores [27.9 (21.8), 4.0 (4.4), and 4.5 (4.2)] than those with 0-5% [24.6 (19.7), 3.4 (3.7), and 4.3 (4.1)]. Patients with severe vitiligo, facial lesions, or ≥ 5% BSA reported higher activity impairment. Mean EQ-5D-5L-utility score was approximately 0.9 regardless of disease severity or total BSA affected. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the impact disease severity can have on HRQoL and daily activities for patients with vitiligo. Lesions that are more severe, on the face, or covering a greater BSA are more often associated with poorer outcomes and activity impairment. These data also highlight the potential insensitivity of commonly used HRQoL measures and a need for more sensitive disease-specific measures.

Vitiligo is a disorder that causes patches of skin to lose pigment. In this study, we examined medical records of patients who have non-segmental vitiligo (the most common type of vitiligo) to better understand how the following factors affect the quality of life of patients with non-segmental vitiligo: (a) disease severity, (b) whether the face was affected, and (c) how much of the body was affected. Using a variety of measures, we found that patients with non-segmental vitiligo had lower quality of life, more symptoms of anxiety and depression, and higher activity impairment than those who did not. Our research highlights the differences in the measures used to assess the quality of life of patients, as well as the need for new therapies for non-segmental vitiligo.

Disease Course, Treatment Patterns and Goals Among Patients with Non-segmental Vitiligo Across Europe and the United States.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently a lack of research regarding disease course and burden as well as treatment patterns and goals in patients with non-segmental vitiligo (NSV). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate disease course, treatment patterns and goals in patients with NSV. METHODS: This analysis used secondary data from the Adelphi Real World Vitiligo Disease Specific Programme™ 2021, specifically, a survey of physicians and their adult and adolescent patients with NSV. Physicians categorized patients by the extent of NSV at time of survey completion as mild, moderate or severe/very severe. Physician-reported patient information included demographics, current/previously prescribed NSV therapies, treatment satisfaction and the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS). Patients completed a survey on treatment satisfaction and the VNS. Treatment pattern data were stratified by disease extent and Fitzpatrick skin type. RESULTS: At survey completion, physicians reported that 38, 50 and 12% of patients (N = 1865) had improving, stable and deteriorating/progressing disease, respectively. Most patients (96%) with mild disease at treatment initiation still had mild disease at the time of survey completion. More than half of patients with moderate disease (62%) or severe/very severe disease (57%) at treatment initiation still had moderate or severe/very severe disease at survey completion. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) were the most common treatment in 40% of patients followed by phototherapy in 30%. Patients hoped for re-pigmentation (mild 56%, moderate 62%, severe/very severe 66%), reduction (mild 50%, moderate 56%, severe/very severe 49%) or cessation of affected areas with vitiligo (mild 48%, moderate 54%, severe/very severe 43%). CONCLUSION: The study findings indicate that a significant proportion of patients with NSV are not improving on current treatments, most commonly TCIs and phototherapy. The results highlight the unmet need for novel and effective therapies to substantially improve re-pigmentation, an important treatment goal for patients with NSV.

Patient Burden of Nonsegmental Vitiligo: A US Real-World Survey of Dermatologists and Their Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by destruction of melanocytes, leading to skin depigmentation. Vitiligo can have a high quality-of-life burden and profound impact on psychosocial well-being. The objectives of this study were to describe the self-reported patient burden among patients with nonsegmental vitiligo with ≤ 10% affected body surface area, summarize the physician-reported psychosocial and psychological impact of vitiligo on patient lives, and describe disease characteristics and treatment history, goals, and satisfaction. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Vitiligo Disease Specific Programme™, a real-world, cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection of physicians and patients with vitiligo, collected in the United States between October 2021 and April 2022. Separate surveys for dermatologists and patients contained questions on clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with vitiligo and burden of vitiligo. Treatment history, goals, and satisfaction were assessed together with the impact of vitiligo on quality of life. RESULTS: Sixty-one dermatologists provided data for 326 patients with ≤ 10% affected body surface area (adults, n = 221; adolescents, n = 105); 90 of those patients also responded to the survey. The most common treatments were topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and narrow-band ultraviolet-B phototherapy, with the main treatment goal being repigmentation. Physician-reported treatment satisfaction was 56%; 25% of patients reported frustration with treatment options. Physicians reported impact of vitiligo on everyday life in 46% of patients. Patients reported 12.7% overall work impairment; mean scores for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety and depression domains were 3.5 and 2.2, respectively, and mean Vitiligo-specific Quality of Life index score was 26.9. Patients with facial involvement experienced higher burden than those without. CONCLUSION: A high patient burden was reported by dermatologists and their patients with vitiligo who had ≤ 10% affected body surface area, including psychosocial and psychological consequences. These findings highlight an unmet need in the treatment of vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic disease in which cells that produce the skin pigment melanin are attacked, causing patches of skin to lose color and become pale. Vitiligo can have emotional impacts such as social or psychological distress that can affect the day-to-day well-being of individuals. However, there is a lack of studies that assess the ways that vitiligo affects the everyday lives of people with the condition in the United States. Dermatologists and people with vitiligo answered survey questions on treatment goals, any vitiligo treatments currently and previously used, and how satisfied they were with the results of treatment. The surveys also contained questions that assessed the impact of vitiligo on everyday life. Sixty-one dermatologists answered questions about 326 patients and 90 of those patients also provided their own answers to the survey questions. Both dermatologists and patients reported that restoring color to patches of pale skin was their goal in treating vitiligo. However, dermatologists and patients both reported that they were dissatisfied with the results of available treatments. Dermatologists and patients both reported that vitiligo impacted aspects of everyday life. Emotional and psychological impacts such as anxiety and depression were reported, as well as negative effects on patients' work and social lives due to vitiligo. These results confirm that vitiligo impacts the day-to-day well-being of patients. Furthermore, this study highlights that there is a need for improvements in the treatment of vitiligo.

Patient and family burden in pediatric atopic dermatitis and its treatment pattern in Japan.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the level of burden in pediatric and adolescent atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in Japan, the associated burden on caregivers/families, and whether this burden varied with age. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Pediatric AD Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients conducted in Japan between July and December 2022. Physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, disease burden, and current/previous therapies. Patients and/or caregivers reported perceived disease severity and impact of AD, including the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and Dermatitis Family Impact questionnaire (DFI). RESULTS: Overall, 55 physicians provided data for 537 AD patients aged ≤17. Mean (SD) overall scores for CDLQI, POEM, and DFI were 9.3 (6.3), 8.3 (6.8), and 11.7 (7.2), respectively. Age was associated with higher patient and/or caregiver-reported CDLQI scores, which increased by 0.543 points per year of age (P = 0.01). Patients with severe disease reported a more significant impact on quality of life factors compared with mild patients (P < 0.001). Age was associated with higher caregiver-reported burden, with DFI scores increasing by 0.325 per year (P = 0.01). Physician-reported impact on caregivers showed that age was significantly associated with increased burden on sleep, daily activities, work, and mood (P < 0.05), with disease severity associated with impact across all factors (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both increasing age and disease severity were associated with the increased impact of AD on patients and their caregivers. Disease control/modification through appropriate therapeutic intervention at a younger age may relieve the burden of pediatric AD on patients and their families.

Characteristics and Management of Patients with Alopecia Areata and Selected Comorbid Conditions: Results from a Survey in Five European Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that causes non-scarring hair loss and can impose a high psychosocial burden on patients. The presence of comorbid conditions may impact the management of AA in clinical practice. This analysis aims to describe disease characteristics and management of AA in patients with concomitant atopic, autoimmune, and psychiatric comorbid conditions. METHODS: Data were collected from the Adelphi Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their adult patients with AA conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK between October 2021 and June 2022. Patients' disease severity was based on physician's definition. Physician-reported data on demographics, AA clinical characteristics, comorbid conditions, and information related to AA therapies were analyzed. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 239 dermatologists provided data for 2083 patients, of which 558 patients (27%) had at least one atopic, autoimmune, or psychiatric comorbid conditions. The most common comorbid conditions were atopic dermatitis, autoimmune thyroid disease, and anxiety. The mean (standard deviation) patient age for the three comorbidity groups was 37.6 years (12.1) and 56% of the patients were women (n = 313). In the three comorbidity groups, 51%, 50%, and 55% of patients with atopic, autoimmune, and psychiatric comorbidities had severe AA with disease progression reported as worsening in 30%, 28%, and 30%, respectively, whereas in the group with no comorbidities, 37% were described as having severe AA and 21% getting worse. Scalp hair loss was the primary sign reported across the three groups of comorbid conditions (atopic, 91%; autoimmune, 91%; psychiatric, 88%). Patients with preselected comorbidities presented more frequently AA-related signs and symptoms beyond scalp hair loss than patients without comorbid conditions. These patients were also more likely to receive topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical immunotherapy, conventional systemic immunosuppressants, and oral Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of their AA. CONCLUSION: This analysis provided insights into the burden and management of AA in patients presenting with atopic, autoimmune, and psychiatric comorbid conditions in five European countries.

Satisfaction with Control of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with Ruxolitinib Cream: US Physician and Patient Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: The 2021 US approval of ruxolitinib cream for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged ≥ 12 years was based on the results of two pivotal phase 3 studies. Currently, real-world data to describe effectiveness of ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment remain limited. Our objective is to describe disease control among adults with mild to moderate AD prescribed ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: Data were from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme™, a US real-world, cross-sectional survey of physician-reported data, undertaken between August 2022 and March 2023. For patients aged ≥ 18 years, physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and physician satisfaction with disease control. Descriptive analysis of data for patients with mild to moderate AD prior to the initiation of ruxolitinib cream and treated with ruxolitinib cream for ≥ 1 month was undertaken. RESULTS: Among physician-reported data from 1360 patients with AD, 149 patients had received ruxolitinib cream (in combination or as monotherapy) for ≥ 1 month, including 59 patients receiving monotherapy. Prior to treatment with ruxolitinib cream, 84.6% of patients had moderate AD (Investigator's Global Assessment, IGA of 3), whereas after treatment (median duration, 26 weeks), only 21.5% had an IGA of 3, with 48.3% of patients having clear or almost clear skin (IGA of 0/1). For these patients, 81.2% were not currently experiencing a flare, and physicians were satisfied with disease control for 87.3%. Results were similar in patients receiving monotherapy. The most frequent physician-reported reasons for prescribing ruxolitinib cream included relieving itch, improving lesion redness/thickness, achieving disease control, and reducing/controlling flares. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings demonstrate effective disease control and physician satisfaction with ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of AD in adults in a clinical practice setting. Outcomes were similar whether ruxolitinib cream was prescribed as monotherapy or in combination regimens, suggesting a role for ruxolitinib cream across the spectrum of disease.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease in which skin can be itchy, inflamed, and cracked. Traditional therapies for mild to moderate AD can be limited by side effects and long-term safety issues. After US approval of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of mild to moderate AD in 2021, the goal of this study was to describe disease control and doctor satisfaction with ruxolitinib cream in a real-world setting. The Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme™ surveyed 159 doctors who treated people with AD between August 2022 and March 2023. Doctors reported records from 1360 patients with mild to moderate AD. In these patients, ruxolitinib cream was used for at least 1 month in 149 patients and was used alone in 59 patients. Before the use of ruxolitinib cream, nearly 85% of the 149 patients had moderate AD. After the use of ruxolitinib cream, about 20% had moderate AD, with half having clear or almost clear skin. About 80% were not currently experiencing flares. Doctors were satisfied with disease control in more than 85% of patients. Patients applying ruxolitinib cream alone had similar results. Doctors most often prescribed ruxolitinib cream for itch relief, disease control, and to reduce or control flares. In summary, when ruxolitinib cream was used by patients, it provided good disease control, and doctors were satisfied with results. Outcomes were similar in patients who applied ruxolitinib cream alone or with another treatment. This suggests that ruxolitinib cream may be useful for patients with AD of differing levels of severity.

Degree of Alignment Between Japanese Patients and Physicians on Alopecia Areata Disease Severity and Treatment Satisfaction: A Real-World Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by non-scarring scalp and/or body hair loss and can negatively impact patient mental health. Data are limited on the alignment of patient and physician perceptions of AA severity with each other and with Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) guideline criteria, and of patient-physician alignment on treatment satisfaction. Therefore, we performed analyses to compare JDA severity groupings with patient-physician alignment on disease severity and to explore treatment satisfaction in AA in Japan. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi AA Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a real-world survey of physicians and patients with AA in Japan conducted January-March 2021. Patients and physicians reported patient AA severity as mild, moderate or severe based on their subjective judgement. Patients were then categorized into five hair loss severity groups according to JDA criteria (S1-5), and patient-physician pairs were matched to assess alignment on severity and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Subjective patient- and physician-reported disease severity generally followed JDA severity groupings. The percentage of patient-physician alignment on severity recognition was 76.3% in the overall population. In misaligned pairs, 20.2%, 14.5%, 7.3%, 25.0% and 0.0% of physicians rated disease as more severe than patients in S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5, respectively. Regarding treatment satisfaction, patient-physician alignment was 57.6% in the overall population. In S5, 46.2% of physicians reported being less satisfied than patients. Both physicians and patients cited lack of efficacy as the main reason for dissatisfaction. Of 221 patients, 39.8% and 29.9% were categorized as borderline-abnormal cases for anxiety and depression, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights previously unreported patient-physician misalignment on disease severity, level of treatment dissatisfaction and unmet needs due to the lack of effective treatment. Further study on how improvement of the misalignment between physicians and patients could increase both patient and physician satisfaction with treatment and improve the quality of life for patients with AA.

Physician- and Patient-Reported Severity and Quality of Life Impact of Alopecia Areata: Results from a Real-World Survey in Five European Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) can negatively affect quality of life (QoL) and is associated with increased prevalence of anxiety and depression (vs people without AA). This study compared physician-assessed and patient self-rated severity of AA in a European sample and described the patient-reported burden of AA stratified by physician-assessed severity. METHODS: Real-world data were collected from the Adelphi Real World AA Disease Specific Programme™, a retrospective point-in-time cross-sectional survey of dermatologists and their adult patients with AA in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK). Physicians provided clinical data and an AA severity assessment, according to their own definition of 'mild', 'moderate' and 'severe'. Patients were invited to provide their perception of AA severity and completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires, including Skindex-16 for AA (Skindex-16 AA), EuroQol-5-dimension questionnaire 5-level (EQ-5D-5L), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Data for 2083 patients were collected by 239 physicians; 561 of these patients completed PRO questionnaires. In 78.5% of cases with available data (N = 549), there was alignment between patient and physician-rated AA severity (severity was rated higher by physicians in 15.7% of cases, by patients in 5.8% of cases). Data from all PRO instruments showed an increase in patient-reported burden and work and activity impairment with increasing physician-rated AA severity. For the Skindex-16 AA, the Emotions scale had the worst scores; anxiety/depression was the EQ-5D-5L dimension with the highest percentages of patients reporting any perceived problem. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight the significant impact that AA can have beyond hair loss, especially for patients with severe AA. There was substantial physician-patient alignment on severity assessment. Higher physician-rated AA severity was associated with higher levels of patient-reported disease burden, including anxiety and depression, and work and activity impairment. These data may help inform appropriate treatment strategies.

Alopecia areata (AA) can negatively affect quality of life and is associated with increased prevalence of anxiety and depression (vs people without AA). This study used surveys of adult patients with AA in Europe and their dermatologists to compare how doctors and patients assess AA severity. We also looked at how patients rate the overall burden and broader effects of AA (not just hair loss) according to whether their doctor classed their AA as 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe'. Data for 2083 patients were collected by 239 doctors; 561 patients completed questionnaires about their AA and its potential effects on their quality of life, mental health and ability to work or perform other activities. In 78.5% of cases (from 549 patients with both patient and doctor-rated severity), patients and their doctors agreed on the same AA severity category (mild, moderate or severe). However, in 15.7% of cases, doctors rated AA severity as being higher than reported by the patient, and in 5.8% of cases the patient classed their AA as being more severe than reported by the doctor. Data from patient questionnaires showed that the burden associated with AA was higher in patients with more severe AA (as per their doctor's own definition of severity); anxiety/depression was the most commonly reported problem related to quality of life. This study highlights the significant impact that AA can have beyond hair loss, especially for patients with severe AA. Information from this study may help to inform appropriate treatment strategies for people with AA.

A description of alopecia areata in European patients based on real-world survey data: physician-reported characterization of severity and associated treatment utilization.

Alopecia areata (AA), an autoimmune disease -affecting the hair of the scalp, face, and/or body, can entail substantial psychological and physical burden for patients. There is currently no international agreement on how to treat AA and the approach may vary across countries. This study investigated the management of AA in clinical practice. Data from a point-in-time survey conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, between October 2021-June 2022, were analysed for adults with mild, moderate, and severe AA, based on physician assessment. Dermatologists were surveyed about factors used to assess disease severity, physician-reported treatment goals, and treatment patterns for AA, including the use of wigs. In total, 239 dermatologists reported on 2,083 patients. Physicians' severity assessment and treatment goals were predominantly driven by scalp hair loss. Topical and intralesional corticosteroids were the most prescribed treatments for mild and moderate AA. Conventional immunosuppressants, oral Janus kinase inhibitors, and topical immunotherapy use generally increased with AA severity and therapy line. Wig use was greatest for severe AA. The primary reasons for the last treatment change in the moderate and severe groups were worsening of condition, lack of initial efficacy, and loss of response, and for mild group were improvement in condition, lack of initial efficacy, and worsening of condition. Findings were generally similar across countries. This analysis provides insights into the management of AA in five European countries and confirms the need for more effective therapies, especially for patients with severe AA.

Patient and physician perspectives on alopecia areata: A real-world assessment of severity and burden in Japan.

The criteria used by physicians to assess alopecia areata severity and its associated burden from the patients' point of view are not well understood. We aimed to understand physician-assessed determinants of disease severity, factors associated with severity, patient-physician concordance, and patient-reported burden by severity. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Alopecia Areata Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists and their alopecia areata patients in real-world practice in Japan conducted between January and March 2021. Patients were categorized into three groups by current disease severity according to physician subjective assessment: mild, moderate, or severe. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were described within and compared between the three patient groups. Our study of 97 dermatologists and 587 patients found overall scalp hair loss was the most important factor considered by physicians in determining disease severity. More severe disease was associated with loss of eyebrow hair, eyelashes, and hair loss from other body areas. Agreement on disease severity between physicians and patients was moderate. From the patient perspective, greater severity of alopecia areata was associated with greater anxiety and depression, with lower work productivity and worse quality of life. Our study provides insights into which factors physicians use to determine alopecia areata severity, how physician and patient severity assessments compare, and the burden of alopecia areata on patients.