Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0270757, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35776772

RESUMEN

Cortico-muscular interactions play important role in sensorimotor control during motor task and are commonly studied by cortico-muscular coherence (CMC) method using joint electroencephalogram-surface electromyogram (EEG-sEMG) signals. As noise and time delay between the two signals weaken the CMC value, coupling difference between non-task sEMG channels is often undetectable. We used sparse representation of EEG channels to compute CMC and detect coupling for task-related and non-task sEMG signals. High-density joint EEG-sEMG (53 EEG channels, 4 sEMG bipolar channels) signals were acquired from 15 subjects (30.26 ± 4.96 years) during four specific hand and foot contraction tasks (2 dynamic and 2 static contraction). Sparse representations method was applied to detect projection of EEG signals on each sEMG channel. Bayesian optimization was employed to select best-fitted method with tuned hyperparameters on the input feeding data while using 80% data as the train set and 20% as test set. K-fold (K = 5) cross-validation method was used for evaluation of trained model. Two models were trained separately, one for CMC data and the other from sparse representation of EEG channels on each sEMG channel. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy criteria were obtained for test dataset to evaluate the performance of task-related and non-task sEMG channels detection. Coupling values were significantly different between grand average of task-related compared to the non-task sEMG channels (Z = -6.33, p< 0.001, task-related median = 2.011, non-task median = 0.112). Strong coupling index was found even in single trial analysis. Sparse representation approach (best fitted model: SVM, Accuracy = 88.12%, Sensitivity = 83.85%, Specificity = 92.45%) outperformed CMC method (best fitted model: KNN, Accuracy = 50.83%, Sensitivity = 52.17%, Specificity = 49.47%). Sparse representation approach offers high performance to detect CMC for discerning the EMG channels involved in the contraction tasks and non-tasks.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Electroencefalografía , Teorema de Bayes , Encéfalo , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Electromiografía/métodos , Humanos
2.
Neurol Sci ; 42(8): 3305-3325, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advances in MRI acquisition and data processing have become important for revealing brain structural changes. Previous studies have reported widespread structural brain abnormalities and cortical thinning in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), as the most common form of focal epilepsy. METHODS: In this research, healthy control cases (n = 20) and patients with left TLE (n = 19) and right TLE (n = 14) were recruited, all underwent 3.0 T MRI with magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence to acquire T1-weighted images. Morphometric alterations in gray matter were identified using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Volumetric alterations in subcortical structures and cortical thinning were also determined. RESULTS: Patients with left TLE demonstrated more prevailing and widespread changes in subcortical volumes and cortical thickness than right TLE, mainly in the left hemisphere, compared to the healthy group. Both VBM analysis and subcortical volumetry detected significant hippocampal atrophy in ipsilateral compared to contralateral side in TLE group. In addition to hippocampus, subcortical volumetry found the thalamus and pallidum bilaterally vulnerable to the TLE. Furthermore, the TLE patients underwent cortical thinning beyond the temporal lobe, affecting gray matter cortices in frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes in the majority of patients, more prevalently for left TLE cases. Exploiting volume changes in individual patients in the hippocampus alone led to 63.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity for lateralization of TLE. CONCLUSION: Alteration of gray matter volumes in subcortical regions and neocortical temporal structures and also cortical gray matter thickness were evidenced as common effects of epileptogenicity, as manifested by the majority of cases in this study.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal , Atrofia/patología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/diagnóstico por imagen , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/patología , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Gris/patología , Hipocampo/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipocampo/patología , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Lóbulo Temporal/diagnóstico por imagen , Lóbulo Temporal/patología
3.
Basic Clin Neurosci ; 10(2): 147-156, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31031901

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, brain functional connectivity studies are extended using the advanced statistical methods. Functional connectivity is identified by synchronous activation in a spatially distinct region of the brain in resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. For this purpose there are several methods such as seed-based correlation analysis based on temporal correlation between different Regions of Interests (ROIs) or between brain's voxels of prior seed. METHODS: In the current study, test-retest Resting State functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data of 21 healthy subjects were analyzed to predict second replication connectivity map using first replication data. A potential estimator is "raw estimator" that uses the first replication data from each subject to predict the second replication connectivity map of the same subject. The second estimator, "mean estimator" uses the average of all sample subjects' connectivity to estimate the correlation map. Shrinkage estimator is made by shrinking raw estimator towards the average connectivity map of all subjects' first replicate. Prediction performance of the second replication correlation map is evaluated by Mean Squared Error (MSE) criteria. RESULTS: By the employment of seed-based correlation analysis and choosing precentral gyrus as the ROI over 21 subjects in the study, on average MSE for raw, mean and shrinkage estimator were 0.2169, 0.1118, and 0.1103, respectively. Also, percent reduction of MSE for shrinkage and mean estimator in comparison with raw estimator is 49.14 and 48.45, respectively. CONCLUSION: Shrinkage approach has the positive effect on the prediction of functional connectivity. When data has a large between session variability, prediction of connectivity map can be improved by shrinking towards population mean.

4.
Basic Clin Neurosci ; 7(2): 143-58, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27303609

RESUMEN

Neurofeedback is a kind of biofeedback, which teaches self-control of brain functions to subjects by measuring brain waves and providing a feedback signal. Neurofeedback usually provides the audio and or video feedback. Positive or negative feedback is produced for desirable or undesirable brain activities, respectively. In this review, we provided clinical and technical information about the following issues: (1) Various neurofeedback treatment protocols i.e. alpha, beta, alpha/theta, delta, gamma, and theta; (2) Different EEG electrode placements i.e. standard recording channels in the frontal, temporal, central, and occipital lobes; (3) Electrode montages (unipolar, bipolar); (4) Types of neurofeedback i.e. frequency, power, slow cortical potential, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and so on; (5) Clinical applications of neurofeedback i.e. treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, depression, epilepsy, insomnia, drug addiction, schizophrenia, learning disabilities, dyslexia and dyscalculia, autistic spectrum disorders and so on as well as other applications such as pain management, and the improvement of musical and athletic performance; and (6) Neurofeedback softwares. To date, many studies have been conducted on the neurofeedback therapy and its effectiveness on the treatment of many diseases. Neurofeedback, like other treatments, has its own pros and cons. Although it is a non-invasive procedure, its validity has been questioned in terms of conclusive scientific evidence. For example, it is expensive, time-consuming and its benefits are not long-lasting. Also, it might take months to show the desired improvements. Nevertheless, neurofeedback is known as a complementary and alternative treatment of many brain dysfunctions. However, current research does not support conclusive results about its efficacy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...