[An Integrated Multidisciplinary Approach to the Care of Renal Cancer Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy].

Kidney cancer is one of the most common cancers globally, ranking 9th and 14th among men and women, respectively. Advances in diagnostic techniques have enabled earlier and potentially less invasive interventions, however, this progress poses a challenge in managing low-malignancy tumors that were previously undiagnosed. To navigate treatment pathways, a deep understanding of the bidirectional relationship between Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is essential, influenced by risk factors such as hypertension and obesity. The debate between partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) continues to be fueled by a rich body of studies in the last two decades, aiming to determine the precise benefits of renal function preservation and overall survival. However, long-term monitoring remains inadequate. There is an urgent need for heightened clinical vigilance, urging meticulous periodic evaluations that include both eGFR and the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, to identify potential deteriorations early. Furthermore, non-neoplastic renal parenchyma requires equal attention, often overshadowed by the assessment of tumor mass. A nuanced analysis is necessary to identify a range of nephropathies that guide more effective therapeutic strategies. A collaborative strategy that brings nephrologists, urologists, nuclear radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists together on a unified platform, focusing on a personalized medicine approach grounded on a profound analysis of individual risk factors, is pivotal in shaping the future of management and prevention strategies. This approach ensures a detailed therapeutic outlook and facilitates early interventions, marrying vigilance with interdisciplinary cooperation, thereby guarding against late diagnoses and offering patients a robust shield in their battle against kidney afflictions.

[Transplant Candidate with Cancer: Should We Proceed?]

Individuals who suffer from end-stage renal disease are at a higher risk of developing certain types of tumors. This risk increases as kidney function deteriorates further. Dialysis patients often witness a surge in the incidence of such malignancies. Interestingly, after the initial period following a kidney transplant, there is a dip in the number of deaths related to neoplasms. However, a long-term view reveals a progressive increase in the risk of developing tumors. The evaluation process for transplant candidacy is thorough, taking into account several factors, including the individual's history of neoplasms and the implications of immunosuppressive therapy. Immunosuppressive therapy is a double-edged tool in managing post-transplant complications, as it can foster environments conducive to neoplasm growth. It is essential to reevaluate, with the aid of an oncological opinion, the waiting time between cancer recovery and the listing for kidney transplantation, based on clinical data and follow-up. Independent of the type of tumor, the requirement to treat and achieve remission delays the listing process, consequently extending the time spent with end-stage renal disease and undergoing dialysis. These factors correlate with increased mortality, heightened risk of cardiovascular disease, and graft loss.

[Classification and Management of MGRS Related Diseases].

Monoclonal Gammopathies of Renal Significance (MGRS) are a complex group of disorders characterized by the production of aberrant monoclonal proteins that interact with kidney structures, causing tissue damage. Unlike neoplastic forms, kidney damage in MGRS does not correlate with clone mass or circulating monoclonal protein levels, conferring unique pre-neoplastic or non-neoplastic properties to the responsible clones. This manuscript explores the heterogeneity of monoclonal proteins involved, varying from full immunoglobulins to free light chains (FLC), and how they result in a spectrum of kidney lesions with differing prognoses. We also elaborate on diagnostic challenges, emphasizing the indispensable role of kidney biopsy, including advanced techniques like laser microdissection and mass spectrometry (LMD/MS) for deposit characterization, particularly in ambiguous or complex cases. Clinical management and treatment considerations, including the necessity for clone identification, are also discussed.

Successful Treatment of Anemia With Anaplastic and Microangiopathic Characteristics in a Kidney Transplant Recipient With Parvovirus B19 Infection: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of parvovirus B19 infection in renal transplantation ranges from 2% to 30%. The age and immune status of the patient influence the severity of the clinical picture. A diagnosis is made by taking as evidence the giant proerythroblasts on a bone marrow sample and the parvovirus B19 viral replication with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique at the blood level. Clinically, parvovirus B19 may appear with fever and severe anemia, which can be followed by pancytopenia and thrombotic microangiopathy in some cases. The literature reports a graft dysfunction rate ranging from 10% to 36%. An infection relapse may happen in 30% of cases. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 33-year-old patient who underwent a kidney transplant in January of 2018. After transplantation, he reached a creatinine value of 1.1 mg/dL and a hemoglobin (Hb) level of 14 g/dL. In April 2019, he developed mycoplasma pneumonia, with signs of hemolytic anemia on bone marrow aspiration. Eventually, he was admitted because of fever, arthralgia, and anemia, with serologic and bone marrow biopsy evidence of red cell aplasia secondary to parvovirus B19 infection. He was treated with 400 mg/kg intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for 10 days; 18 days after the end of treatment, he reached a creatinine value of 1.15 mg/dL, an Hb of 12.5 g/dL, and a reduction of the viral load from 25,000,000 copies/mL to 1,600,000 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia with both an aplasic and hemolytic component was successfully treated using immunoglobulin therapy, with a significant fall in the parvovirus B19 viral load.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Renal Transplant Recipients: A 2-Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by an excessive immune activation. HLH can be triggered by a variety of events that disrupt immune homeostasis, such as infections and immunosuppression. HLH presents with heterogeneous clinical symptoms and laboratory findings such as pancytopenia, elevated liver enzymes, impaired renal function, and hyperferritinemia. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Case 1. A 58-year-old man was admitted because of a high fever and diarrhea. Laboratory findings showed acute renal impairment, pancytopenia, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA seropositivity with a replication index of 2 million copies/mL, and hyperferritinemia. A diagnosis of HLH was confirmed by bone marrow aspiration. He was treated with etoposide, steroids, and rituximab with initial good response and good kidney function restoration. He was discharged after 31 days but eventually died after 44 days after a disease relapse. Case 2. A 51-year-old kidney transplant recipient was admitted because of a fever of unknown origin. A worsening renal function, pancytopenia, EBV DNA of 4,356,222 copies/mL on blood, D-Dimer 7505 ng/mL, ferritinemia 9180.9 ug/L, and triglycerides 1273 mg/dL were found. Bone marrow aspiration was negative for HLH; a few days later, a diagnosis of HLH was made after a positive bone marrow biopsy. Continuous renal replacement therapy was started in the intensive care unit because of severe lactic acidosis due to sepsis. She died few days later. CONCLUSION: EBV infection could be a trigger for HLH in a renal transplant patient. Hyperferritinemia is useful for differential diagnosis in a septic patient. The outcome is very poor even with prompt treatment.