Vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibody response: the comparability of S1-specific binding assays depends on epitope and isotype discrimination.

Background: Quantification of the SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response by serological immunoassays is critical for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, neutralizing antibody titers to the viral spike (S) protein have been proposed as a correlate of protection (CoP). The WHO established the First International Standard (WHO IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (Ig) (NIBSC 20/136) to harmonize binding assays with the same antigen specificity by assigning the same unitage in binding antibody units (BAU)/ml. Method: In this study, we analyzed the S1-specific antibody response in a cohort of healthcare workers in Germany (n = 76) during a three-dose vaccination course over 8.5 months. Subjects received either heterologous or homologous prime-boost vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or three doses of BNT162b2. Antibodies were quantified using three anti-S1 binding assays (ELISA, ECLIA, and PETIA) harmonized to the WHO IS. Serum levels of neutralizing antibodies were determined using a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Binding assays were compared using Spearman's rank correlation and Passing-Bablok regression. Findings: All assays showed good correlation and similar antibody kinetics correlating with neutralizing potential. However, the assays show large proportional differences in BAU/ml. ECLIA and PETIA, which detect total antibodies against the receptor- binding domain (RBD) within the S1 subunit, interact similarly with the convalescent plasma-derived WHO IS but differently with vaccine serum, indicating a high sensitivity to the IgG/IgM/IgA ratio. Conclusion: All three binding assays allow monitoring of the antibody response in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals. However, the assay-specific differences hinder the definition of a common protective threshold in BAU/ml. Our results highlight the need for the thoughtful use of conversion factors and consideration of method-specific differences. To improve the management of future pandemics and harmonize total antibody assays, we should strive for reference material with a well-characterized Ig isotype composition.

Immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS Quantification of the Sepsis Biomarker Procalcitonin Using Magnetic- and Polystyrene-Bead Immobilized Polyclonal Antibodies.

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker for bacterial sepsis, and accurate quantification of PCT is critical for sepsis diagnosis and treatment. Immunological PCT quantification methods are routinely used in clinical laboratories, yet there is a need for harmonization of PCT quantification protocols. An orthogonal method to clinical immunological assays, such as LC-MS/MS, is required. In this study, a highly sensitive and robust immunoaffinity LC-MRM quantitative method for detecting procalcitonin in human serum has been developed. An initial comparison of immunocapture of PCT with a polyclonal anti-PCT antibody immobilized on polystyrene nanoparticles (Latex) and magnetic beads demonstrated superior performance with magnetic beads. Three tryptic PCT peptides from the N- and C-terminal regions of PCT were selected for LC-MS/MS quantification. For PCT quantification, an LLOQ of 0.25 ng/mL of PCT in human serum was achieved using a sample volume of 1 mL. The method's trueness and precision consistently lie within the 15% margin. The parallel measurement of three PCT peptides may allow future differentiation of intact PCT vs other PCT forms originating from potential degradation, processing, or polymorphisms. An established and validated LC-MRM-based quantification of PCT will be relevant as an orthogonal method for harmonization and standardization of clinical assays for PCT.

Comprehensive Comparison of the Capacity of Functionalized Sepharose, Magnetic Core, and Polystyrene Nanoparticles to Immuno-Precipitate Procalcitonin from Human Material for the Subsequent Quantification by LC-MS/MS.

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The fast and accurate diagnosis of sepsis by procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as an essential tool in clinical medicine. Although in use in the clinical laboratory for a long time, PCT quantification has not yet been standardized. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry working group on the standardization of PCT (IFCC-WG PCT) aims to provide an LC-MS/MS-based reference method as well as the highest metrological order reference material to address this diagnostic need. Here, we present the systematic evaluation of the efficiency of an immuno-enrichment method, based on functionalized Sepharose, magnetic-core, or polystyrene (latex) nano-particles, to quantitatively precipitate PCT from different human sample materials. This method may be utilized for both mass spectrometric and proteomic purposes. In summary, only magnetic-core nano-particles functionalized by polyclonal PCT antibodies can fulfil the necessary requirements of the international standardization of PCT. An optimized method proved significant benefits in quantitative and specific precipitation as well as in the subsequent LC-MS/MS detection of PCT in human serum samples or HeLa cell extract. Based on this finding, further attempts of the PCT standardization process will utilize a magnetic core-derived immuno-enrichment step, combined with subsequent quantitative LC-MS/MS detection.

Bioinformatical Design and Performance Evaluation of a Nucleocapsid- and an RBD-Based Particle Enhanced Turbidimetric Immunoassay (PETIA) to Quantify the Wild Type and Variants of Concern-Derived Immunoreactivity of SARS-CoV-2.

Since SARS-CoV-2 emerged in December 2019 in Wuhan, the resulting pandemic has paralyzed the economic and cultural life of the world. Variants of concern (VOC) strongly increase pressure on public health systems. Rapid, easy-to-use, and cost-effective assays are essential to manage the pandemic. Here we present a bioinformatical approach for the fast and efficient design of two innovative serological Particle Enhanced Turbidimetric Immunoassays (PETIA) to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 immunoresponse. To confirm bioinformatical assumptions, an S-RBD- and a Nucleocapsid-based PETIA were produced. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for 95 patient samples using a BioMajesty™ fully automated analyzer. The S-RBD-based PETIA showed necessary specificity (98%) over the N protein-based PETIA (21%). Further, the reactivity and cross-reactivity of the RBD-based PETIA towards variant-derived antibodies of SARS-CoV-2 were assessed by a quenching inhibition test. The inhibition kinetics of the S-RBD variants Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma, Kappa, and Omicron were evaluated. In summary, we showed that specific and robust PETIA immunoassays can be rapidly designed and developed. The quantification of the SARS-CoV-2-related immunoresponse of variants (Alpha to Kappa) is possible using specific RBD assays. In contrast, Omicron revealed lower cross-reactivity (approx. 50%). To ensure the quantification of the Omicron variant, modified immunoassays appear to be necessary.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody progression and neutralizing potential in mild symptomatic COVID-19 patients - a comparative long term post-infection study.

Background: Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has been keeping the world in suspense. Rapid tests, molecular diagnosis of acute infections, and vaccination campaigns with vaccines are building blocks of strategic pandemic control worldwide. For laboratory diagnostics, the quantification of the antibody titer of convalescents and vaccinated patients is thus increasingly coming to the fore. Methods: Here we present an evaluation on the comparability of five serological tests on a cohort of 13 patients with mild COVID-19 disease. Also participants who were vaccinated after recovery were included in this study. All common immune methods (ELISA, CLIA, PETIA) and SARS-CoV-2 specific antigens (N-, S1- and RBD-) were specifically tracked and directly compared for up to 455 days. The titer of recovered participants was also set to the degree of symptoms during infection and the occurrence of Long-COVID. In addition, relative comparability of different serological tests, all standardized to WHO, was set in reference to the neutralizing potential of the corresponding participants. Findings: The individual immune responses over 455 days after a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection remain stable, in contrast to vaccinated participants. All sero-tests reveal comparable performance and dynamics during the study and compared well to a surrogate neutralization test. Conclusion: The information presented here will help clinicians in the daily laboratory work in the selection and evaluation of different serological tests offered. The data also will support in respect of a sero-test-based neutralization cutoff.

National external quality assessment and direct method comparison reflect crucial deviations of Procalcitonin measurements in Germany.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sepsis is a major concern worldwide, affecting 49 million individuals and being related to 11 million deaths. Its fast diagnosis is the key factor to guarantee a positive prognosis. Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as one powerful biomarker to early diagnose sepsis and for monitoring of antibiotic treatment. However, its clinical utility is jeopardized by missing standardisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we present a 1-year follow-up of the External Quality Assessment (EQA) in Germany, depicting substantial discrepancies among manufacturers and the used assay technology of current PCT measurements. A direct method comparison on two immunoassays (Abbott vs. DiaSys) on a set of 135 routine samples was used to analyse the causes of observed deviations. RESULTS: All BRAHMS-licensed manufacturers (Thermo, Roche, Abbott, Siemens, Biomérieux), the Beckman and DiaSys immunoassays as well as all assay types (fluorescence, luminescence, PETIA) reveal substantial recovery differences between each other. However, upon a non-linear re-standardization of calibrators, the two directly compared methods (Abbott, DiaSys) are well interchangeable. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates the heterogenic situation of PCT measurements in Germany among manufacturers and all methods. By introducing dedicated correction factors, comparable results of PCT can be achieved. This work also strengthens the inevitability of calibrator traceability and higher metrological reference materials on PCT.

Characterization of the Diagnostic Performance of a Novel COVID-19 PETIA in Comparison to Four Routine N-, S- and RBD-Antigen Based Immunoassays.

In 2019, a novel coronavirus emerged in Wuhan in the province of Hubei, China. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) quickly spread across the globe, causing the neoteric COVID-19 pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is commonly transmitted by droplet infection and aerosols when coughing or sneezing, as well as high-risk exposures to infected individuals by face-to-face contact without protective gear. To date, a broad variety of techniques have emerged to assess and quantify the specific antibody response of a patient towards a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we report the first comprehensive comparison of five different assay systems: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA), Electro-Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA), and a new Particle-Enhanced Turbidimetric Immunoassay (PETIA) for SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, we also evaluated the suitability of N-, S1- and RBD-antigens for quantifying the SARS-CoV-2 specific immune response. Linearity and precision, overall sensitivity and specificity of the assays, stability of samples, and cross-reactivity of general viral responses, as well as common coronaviruses, were assessed. Moreover, the reactivity of all tests to seroconversion and different sample matrices was quantified. All five assays showed good overall agreement, with 76% and 87% similarity for negative and positive samples, respectively. In conclusion, all evaluated methods showed a high consistency of results and suitability for the robust quantification of the SARS-CoV-2-derived immune response.

Bioanalytical Performance of a New Particle-Enhanced Method for Measuring Procalcitonin.

We report the analytical performances of two particle-enhanced (PETIA) methods for measuring procalcitonin (PCT), the Diazyme PCT and the new DiaSys PCT assay, and their concordance of values with BRAHMS PCT Kryptor©. The total imprecisions onto two control levels and one serum pool were for DiaSys 5.42%, 3.3% and 7.53% and for Diazyme 10.7%, 2.9% and 13.23%, respectively. The limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantification were under the 0.25 cut-off for the two methods. The linearity in the lower range was acceptable for both methods. No significant effect on PCT determination was observed for DiaSys' assay upon addition of interfering substances. With the Diazyme assay, significant effects were seen with rheumatoid factor (RF), lipid and hemoglobin. Correlation studies on 136 sera showed a good correlation between PCT measurements using DiaSys assay against the Kryptor system, while only a poor correlation was observed between the Diazyme assay, especially for low values. The novel PETIA PCT assay from DiaSys shows analytical performances acceptable for clinical use and the concordance with Kryptor method was fine at all clinical cut-offs. In contrast, despite comparable analytical performances, the Diazyme PETIA method exhibited a poor concordance with the Kryptor method.