Impact of prior bevacizumab therapy on the incidence of ramucirumab-induced proteinuria in colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The association between prior bevacizumab (BEV) therapy and ramucirumab (RAM)-induced proteinuria is not known. We aimed to investigate this association in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: mCRC patients who received folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus RAM were divided into with and without prior BEV treatment groups. The cumulative incidence of grade 2-3 proteinuria and rate of RAM discontinuation within 6 months (6M) after RAM initiation were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: We evaluated 245 patients. In the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model including prior BEV, age, sex, comorbidities, eGFR, proteinuria ≥ 2 + at baseline, and later line of RAM, prior BEV treatment contributed to proteinuria onset (P < 0.01). A shorter interval between final BEV and initial RAM increased the proteinuria risk; the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the intervals of < 28 days, 28-55 days, and > 55 days (referring to prior BEV absence) were 2.60 (1.23-5.51), 1.51 (1.01-2.27), and 1.04 (0.76-1.44), respectively. The rate of RAM discontinuation for ≤ 6M due to anti-VEGF toxicities was significantly higher in the prior BEV treatment group compared with that in the no prior BEV treatment group (18% vs. 6%, P = 0.02). Second-line RAM discontinuation for ≤ 6M without progression resulted in shorter overall survival of 132 patients with prior BEV treatment (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sequential FOLFIRI plus RAM after BEV failure, especially within 55 days, may exacerbate proteinuria. Its escalated anti-VEGF toxicity may negatively impact the overall survival.

[Three Cases of Augmented Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy after Changing from mFOLFOX6 to FOLFIRI Therapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer].

We had cases in which peripheral neuropathy was augmented after changing from mFOLFOX6, a chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, to FOLFIRI and comparatively examined disease status and trends. There were no shared points with respect to patient characteristics, timing of peripheral neuropathy augmentation, drug dosage, etc. It appeared that the change in chemotherapy itself had an effect on neuropathic symptoms. Regarding the change in chemotherapy, the therapeutic agent was switched from oxaliplatin to irinotecan; the cause was unknown, but some effects of these two drugs were suggested. Future investigation, including the examination of genetic mutations, is necessary.

RANKL-induced c-Src activation contributes to conventional anti-cancer drug resistance and dasatinib overcomes this resistance in RANK-expressing multiple myeloma cells.

The survival and growth of multiple myeloma (MM) cells are facilitated by cell-cell interactions with bone marrow stromal cells and the bone marrow microenvironment. These interactions induce de novo drug resistance known as cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance. Our previous results recently revealed that the receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL), which is expressed by bone marrow stromal cells, contributes to anti-cancer drug resistance through the activation of various signaling molecules and suppression of Bim expression in RANK-expressing MM cells. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying RANKL-induced drug resistance remain uncharacterized. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism of RANKL-induced drug resistance in RANK-expressing MM cell lines. We found treatment of MM cells with RANKL-induced c-Src phosphorylation and activation of the downstream signaling molecules Akt, mTOR, STAT3, JNK, and NF-κB. In addition, treatment with dasatinib, a c-Src inhibitor, overcame RANKL- and bone marrow stromal cell-induced drug resistance to adriamycin, vincristine, dexamethasone, and melphalan by suppressing c-Src, Akt, mTOR, STAT3, JNK, and NF-κB activation and enhancing expression of Bim. Overall, RANKL- and bone marrow stromal cell-induced drug resistance correlated with the activation of c-Src signaling pathways, which caused a decrease in Bim expression. Dasatinib treatment of RANK-expressing MM cells re-sensitized them to anti-cancer drugs. Therefore, inhibition of c-Src may be a new therapeutic approach for overcoming RANKL-induced drug resistance in patients with MM.

[Influence of Next-Day Administration of Pegfilgrastim after FEC100 Chemotherapy in Japanese with Breast Cancer on Neutrophil Count].

Febrile neutropenia(FN)is one of the serious treatment-related toxicities after FEC100(5-fluorouracil 500mg/m2, epiru- bicin 100mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2)chemotherapy for breast cancer. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(GCSF) is used as a support therapy for FN. Thus, we evaluated retrospectively the safety of administering pegfilgrastim the day after FEC100 chemotherapy in Japanese patients with breast cancer as compared with lenograstim. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 91.7% patients after pegfilgrastim administration and in 63.2% after lenograstim. The incidence rate of FN was 7.0%after pegfilgrastim administration and 9.7%after lenograstim, a difference that was not significantly different(p= 0.741). The mean relative dose intensity was good at 0.98 for pegfilgrastim and 0.97 for lenograstim. In conclusion, pegfilgrastim is not inferior to lenograstim in the incidence of FN. However, we do not recommend administering pegfilgrastim on the day after FEC100 therapy because it causes more severe neutropenia and has a high risk of FN. The timing of administration of pegfilgrastim in FEC100 therapy requires further study.