The V-ATPase/ATG16L1 axis is controlled by the V1H subunit.

Defects in organellar acidification indicate compromised or infected compartments. Recruitment of the autophagy-related ATG16L1 complex to pathologically neutralized organelles targets ubiquitin-like ATG8 molecules to perturbed membranes. How this process is coupled to proton gradient disruption is unclear. Here, we reveal that the V1H subunit of the vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) proton pump binds directly to ATG16L1. The V1H/ATG16L1 interaction only occurs within fully assembled V-ATPases, allowing ATG16L1 recruitment to be coupled to increased V-ATPase assembly following organelle neutralization. Cells lacking V1H fail to target ATG8s during influenza infection or after activation of the immune receptor stimulator of interferon genes (STING). We identify a loop within V1H that mediates ATG16L1 binding. A neuronal V1H isoform lacks this loop and is associated with attenuated ATG8 targeting in response to ionophores in primary murine and human iPSC-derived neurons. Thus, V1H controls ATG16L1 recruitment following proton gradient dissipation, suggesting that the V-ATPase acts as a cell-intrinsic damage sensor.

The malaria parasite egress protease SUB1 is activated through precise, plasmepsin X-mediated cleavage of the SUB1 prodomain.

BACKGROUND: The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum replicates within red blood cells, then ruptures the cell in a process called egress in order to continue its life cycle. Egress is regulated by a proteolytic cascade involving an essential parasite subtilisin-like serine protease called SUB1. Maturation of SUB1 initiates in the parasite endoplasmic reticulum with autocatalytic cleavage of an N-terminal prodomain (p31), which initially remains non-covalently bound to the catalytic domain, p54. Further trafficking of the p31-p54 complex results in formation of a terminal p47 form of the SUB1 catalytic domain. Recent work has implicated a parasite aspartic protease, plasmepsin X (PMX), in maturation of the SUB1 p31-p54 complex through controlled cleavage of the prodomain p31. METHODS: Here we use biochemical and enzymatic analysis to examine the activation of SUB1 by PMX. RESULTS: We show that both p31 and p31-p54 are largely dimeric under the relatively acidic conditions to which they are likely exposed to PMX in the parasite. We confirm the sites within p31 that are cleaved by PMX and determine the order of cleavage. We find that cleavage by PMX results in rapid loss of the capacity of p31 to act as an inhibitor of SUB1 catalytic activity and we directly demonstrate that exposure to PMX of recombinant p31-p54 complex activates SUB1 activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that precise, PMX-mediated cleavage of the SUB1 prodomain activates SUB1 enzyme activity. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings elucidate the role of PMX in activation of SUB1, a key effector of malaria parasite egress.

Mechanism of chaperone coordination during cotranslational protein folding in bacteria.

Protein folding is assisted by molecular chaperones that bind nascent polypeptides during mRNA translation. Several structurally distinct classes of chaperones promote de novo folding, suggesting that their activities are coordinated at the ribosome. We used biochemical reconstitution and structural proteomics to explore the molecular basis for cotranslational chaperone action in bacteria. We found that chaperone binding is disfavored close to the ribosome, allowing folding to precede chaperone recruitment. Trigger factor recognizes compact folding intermediates that expose an extensive unfolded surface, and dictates DnaJ access to nascent chains. DnaJ uses a large surface to bind structurally diverse intermediates and recruits DnaK to sequence-diverse solvent-accessible sites. Neither Trigger factor, DnaJ, nor DnaK destabilize cotranslational folding intermediates. Instead, the chaperones collaborate to protect incipient structure in the nascent polypeptide well beyond the ribosome exit tunnel. Our findings show how the chaperone network selects and modulates cotranslational folding intermediates.

Mechanism of single-stranded DNA annealing by RAD52-RPA complex.

RAD52 is important for the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks1,2, mitotic DNA synthesis3-5 and alternative telomere length maintenance6,7. Central to these functions, RAD52 promotes the annealing of complementary single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)8,9 and provides an alternative to BRCA2/RAD51-dependent homologous recombination repair10. Inactivation of RAD52 in homologous-recombination-deficient BRCA1- or BRCA2-defective cells is synthetically lethal11,12, and aberrant expression of RAD52 is associated with poor cancer prognosis13,14. As a consequence, RAD52 is an attractive therapeutic target against homologous-recombination-deficient breast, ovarian and prostate cancers15-17. Here we describe the structure of RAD52 and define the mechanism of annealing. As reported previously18-20, RAD52 forms undecameric (11-subunit) ring structures, but these rings do not represent the active form of the enzyme. Instead, cryo-electron microscopy and biochemical analyses revealed that ssDNA annealing is driven by RAD52 open rings in association with replication protein-A (RPA). Atomic models of the RAD52-ssDNA complex show that ssDNA sits in a positively charged channel around the ring. Annealing is driven by the RAD52 N-terminal domains, whereas the C-terminal regions modulate the open-ring conformation and RPA interaction. RPA associates with RAD52 at the site of ring opening with critical interactions occurring between the RPA-interacting domain of RAD52 and the winged helix domain of RPA2. Our studies provide structural snapshots throughout the annealing process and define the molecular mechanism of ssDNA annealing by the RAD52-RPA complex.

Recruitment of trimeric eIF2 by phosphatase non-catalytic subunit PPP1R15B.

Regulated protein phosphorylation controls most cellular processes. The protein phosphatase PP1 is the catalytic subunit of many holoenzymes that dephosphorylate serine/threonine residues. How these enzymes recruit their substrates is largely unknown. Here, we integrated diverse approaches to elucidate how the PP1 non-catalytic subunit PPP1R15B (R15B) captures its full trimeric eIF2 substrate. We found that the substrate-recruitment module of R15B is largely disordered with three short helical elements, H1, H2, and H3. H1 and H2 form a clamp that grasps the substrate in a region remote from the phosphorylated residue. A homozygous N423D variant, adjacent to H1, reducing substrate binding and dephosphorylation was discovered in a rare syndrome with microcephaly, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. These findings explain how R15B captures its 125 kDa substrate by binding the far end of the complex relative to the phosphosite to present it for dephosphorylation by PP1, a paradigm of broad relevance.