Long-term outcomes of pelvic-fascia sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard technique: Superior urinary function and quality of life without compromising oncologic efficacy in a single-surgeon series.

BACKGROUND: Prostatic fascia-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (PFS-RARP) has improved short-term postoperative continence compared to standard prostatectomy (S-RARP) but long-term differences remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two S-RARP followed by 239 PFS-RARPs were performed by a single surgeon. Univariate analyses were performed with t-test, χ2, Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Regression models analyzed associates of EPIC-CP scores and oncologic outcomes. Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed postoperative continence. Primary outcomes included patient-reported urinary incontinence (UI) via EPIC-CP and continence rates. Secondary outcomes included EPIC-CP scores, positive surgical margins (PSM), and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Perioperative outcomes and time to continence were measured. RESULTS: Median follow-up for PFS-RARP vs. S-RARP was 26 vs. 65 months. PFS-RARP demonstrated improved EPIC-CP UI and total scores at 24 months. On multivariate analysis, PFS-RARP was associated with improved EPIC-CP UI and total scores through 18 months, but not with PSM or BCR. PFS-RARP had a 39% and 66% reduced risk of incontinence using 0 and 0 to 1 pad-use definitions (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 - 0.95; HR:0.34, 95% CI 0.16 - 0.76). Continence returned faster with PFS-RARP (0 PPD: 91.0 days vs. 261 days, P < 0.001; 0-1 PPD: 32.7 days vs. 171 days, P < 0.001). There were no differences in PSM (35% vs. 25%, P = 0.064). There were more anterior PSM in PFS-RARP vs. S-RARP (47% vs. 26% P = 0.035), but no differences in BCR (16% vs. 22% P = 0.241). CONCLUSIONS: PFS-RARP improves continence and patient-reported QOL up to 24 months postoperatively without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Outcomes and Safety of Suprapubic vs Urethral Catheterization Following Pelvic Fascia‒Sparing Robotic Prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Urethral catheter (UC) discomfort remains a burden following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Suprapubic catheters (SPCs) may reduce patient discomfort and increase satisfaction. Pelvic fascia‒sparing (PFS) RARP reduces the technical challenges of intraoperative SPC placement. We examined postoperative outcomes of SPC vs UC placement following PFS-RARP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective institutional review board‒approved database of PFS-RARP patients from June 2020 to December 2022 receiving SPC (n = 108) or UC (n = 104) postoperatively. Demographics and clinical and perioperative outcomes were captured. Postoperative patient-reported quality of life was measured using EPIC-CP (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice). Patients with intraoperative complications or intraoperative leaks or undergoing salvage prostatectomy were excluded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to compare outcomes. RESULTS: No significant differences in demographics or oncologic outcomes existed. There were no differences in complications, including urethral stricture or anastomotic leak. Men receiving SPC vs UC had earlier return to continence (7 vs 16 days, P < .001) and higher continence rates at catheter removal (67.6% vs 43.3%, P = .0003). On adjusted analyses, SPC was an independent predictor of continence at catheter removal (OR 2.21, P = .023). There were no differences between groups in preoperative or postoperative EPIC-CP scores, including no differences in postoperative quality of life (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: SPC after PFS-RARP is a safe and feasible alternative to UC. SPC is associated with an earlier return to continence and higher continence rates at catheter removal. Use of SPC may increase overall patient satisfaction following PFS-RARP.

Case of NUTM::CIC fusion sarcoma surrounding inflatable penile prosthesis.

A 66 year old male with history of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement was incidentally diagnosed with a 5 cm inguinal mass abutting the IPP reservoir after prostate MRI performed for an elevated PSA. This was surgically resected en bloc with his ipsilateral testicle and IPP reservoir, with final pathology demonstrating a high-grade round cell NUTM::CIC fusion sarcoma. Management is primarily surgical, though patients with high-risk features may require adjuvant chemoradiation.

Salvage Retzius-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of Complications, Functional Outcomes, and Oncologic Outcomes.

(Background) Radiation failure for localized prostate cancer is seen in 20-60% of patients who do not undergo extirpative surgery. Though potentially curative, salvage prostatectomy (SS) has not been frequently performed historically due to high rates of complications and postoperative incontinence. With the advent of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, these rates appear to be improved. Retzius-sparing approaches have additionally been shown to improve continence outcomes in the index setting, and may further improve continence outcomes in salvage cases while maintaining oncologic integrity. (Methods) We performed a literature review and qualitative analysis of published papers on salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SRS). Three studies met criteria and were included in analysis. (Results) There were more patients with Gleason Grade Group 1 disease after initial treatment in the SRS group vs. SS (22% vs. 8%). Patients most frequently underwent external beam radiation therapy in both groups (52% vs. 49%). 30-day complication rates were 10% and 26% for SRS and SS, respectively. Continence outcomes were significantly improved in SRS with 59% of continence (based on study criteria) compared to 38% in SS. Time to continence was similarly improved for SRS. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence were not significantly different between SRS and SS in any study. (Conclusions) SRS is a safe and feasible option for salvage treatment of localized prostate cancer and may improve postoperative continence outcomes. Positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates are similar to those reported in SS.

Prognostic factors for overall survival in malignant ureteral obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: To identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) from gynecologic malignancy (GM), with the goal of improving patient selection for urinary diversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 126 patients with MUO from GM at two academic centers from 2011-2019. Factors related to OS identified by Cox regression proportional hazard model. In patients with incomplete survival data (n = 30), hospice was used as a surrogate for death. Multivariate models and receivers operating characteristics (ROC) curves were created for hemoglobin and albumin values. RESULTS: Overall median survival was 6.2 months. On univariate analysis, age at diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 8, advanced clinical stage, ascites, pleural effusion, albumin, and hemoglobin were associated with poor OS. OS was higher for those receiving ureteral stenting as compared with no intervention. There was no survival difference based on hydronephrosis grade, stent failure (SF), or creatinine at the time of intervention. On multivariate analysis, albumin < 2.85 g/dL and hemoglobin < 9.6 g/dL were predictive of poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: OS in patients with MUO due to GM is poor. Several prognostic factors for poor survival including low serum albumin and hemoglobin were identified. Ureteral stenting was associated with improved OS compared to observation, but selection bias likely contributed to this result. Additional studies are needed to clarify this finding. These data can be utilized to counsel patients regarding outcomes after urinary diversion in the setting of MUO and perhaps avoid additional procedures in some of these patients who will not derive meaningful benefit.