Successful Adolescent Varicocelectomy Improves Total Motile Sperm Count.

BACKGROUND: Management of the adolescent varicocele focuses on optimizing fertility potential, but to date there is limited data on the success of varicocelectomy on optimizing semen parameters for individual adolescent patients. We reviewed our database of over 1600 adolescent varicocele patients to find those with pre- and postoperative semen analyses to determine the impact of varicocele correction. METHODS: 15 Tanner stage V patients with unilateral clinically apparent left-sided with pre- and postoperative semen analyses were identified. Mixed models were used to compare semen parameters pre- and post-varicocelectomy in patients with successful management. RESULTS: Complete elimination of the varicocele was achieved in 12/15 (80%) patients. Three patients had persistent varicocele (with down-grading in two) and declined further intervention. Median time between pre- and postoperative semen analyses was 24.2 months. For those with successful varicocele correction, total motile sperm count (TMSC) improved in all but one (Figure 1), with an average increase of 44.0 million (95% CI: 18.7-69.3) in post-varicocelectomy analyses compared to pre-varicocelectomy (p = 0.0016). Mean percent improvement was 649.2%. It went from abnormal to normal (≥20 million/cc) in 55.6% (5/9). For the three patients with persistent varicocele, one had improved TMSC from abnormal to normal range, one had worsening within normal range, and one had effectively no change. CONCLUSION: Successful correction of adolescent varicocele may improve TMSC. In over half of our institution's cases, an abnormal value normalized. Surgical intervention may be considered for adolescent varicoceles associated with abnormal semen parameters. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study.

Facilitators and challenges to transitioning to self-catheterization: Patient and caregiver perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is a well-established method of managing lower urinary tract dysfunction. Depending on the age at introduction, caregivers might perform CIC initially but then transition responsibility to their children. Little is known about how to support families during this transition. Our aim is to learn the facilitators and challenges experienced when supporting the transition from caregiver-led CIC to patient self-CIC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phenomenological approach was used to gather information from caregivers and children >12 years through semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis was utilized to generate themes around experience with the transition from caregiver-led CIC to patient self-CIC. RESULTS: Of the 40 families interviewed, 25 families underwent successful transition to patient self-CIC. Analysis of excerpts identified a three-step process, including (1) desiring to learn self-CIC, (2) practical learning of CIC techniques, and (3) mastering of techniques leading to emotional and physical independence. Many families experienced challenges in transitioning to self-CIC, including patient or caregiver reluctance, improper equipment, past negative experiences, lack of knowledge about urinary tract anatomy and function, abnormal anatomy, and/or moderate to severe intellectual disability. DISCUSSION: Authors reviewed interventions to address challenges and provide clinical care recommendations to enhance success during the transition to patient self-CIC. CONCLUSION: No prior studies have identified this stepwise process that occurs in the transition from caregiver-led CIC to patient self-CIC. Healthcare providers and school officials (where indicated) can support families during this transition, with attention to facilitators and challenges identified in this study.

The art of introducing clean intermittent catheterization: How families respond and adapt: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Since its inception >50 years ago, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) has become ubiquitous in managing lower urinary tract dysfunction in children. Emphasis has been on its impact on daily life, but little on its implementation and adjustment in families. The aim of the current study was to discover how families learned to implement and manage their child's CIC needs by interviewing caregivers, adolescents, and young adults about their experiences. Interviews were designed to uncover facilitators and barriers to beginning CIC to initiate potential improvements in a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS: A semi-structured interview guide was developed and piloted initially to 12 families for validation. Between August 2018 and October 2019, 40 families (52 interviews of caregivers and patients >12 years) were then interviewed with open-ended questions interspersed with more specific ones to generate discussion. Transcripts were coded using Dedoose software to create a base list with emergent codes. Inductive and deductive methods were employed to generate themes. Consensus was reached during successive team meetings. RESULTS: Five major and several subthemes emerged regarding implementation of CIC by caregivers and patients learning CIC for the first time. THEME 1: Parental reaction to CIC: Caregivers described benefits of an adjustment period on learning their child's need for CIC. Prenatal information to caregivers of spina bifida children gave them time to mentally process the need for CIC. THEME 2: Ease of learning CIC: impact of age and gender: caregivers identified advantages of initiating CIC in infancy. Caregivers speculated CIC was physically easier in boys than girls due to meatus location. Developmentally ready children expressed a desire for independence and privacy as they learned to initiate CIC. THEME 3: The impact of additional caregiver support in learning and performing CIC: presence of multiple caregivers optimized learning and implementation of CIC. Having secondary caregivers available provided peace of mind and more flexibility in maintaining reliable CIC care. Patients learning CIC found it helpful to have a parent present at the teaching session. Occasionally, female caregivers reported feelings of anger and frustration when male caregivers were reluctant to be involved in catheterization, irrespective of their child's gender. THEME 4: Satisfaction with healthcare team's approach: The healthcare team's responsiveness to their learning needs affected how they mastered CIC. The healthcare team's teaching and reassurance helped build caregiver confidence. Developmentally appropriate children were able to learn self-catheterization when supported by the healthcare team. Patients learning self-CIC articulated having a supportive healthcare team was helpful with implementation. THEME 5: Effect of CIC on employment status relative to job changes, insurance, and daycare: implementing and performing CIC presented a spectrum of issues related to employment. Educating employers regarding CIC facilitated a caregiver's ability to both remain at work and administer to their child. Caregivers underscored the importance of adequate insurance when considering employment choices. Concerns about daycare availability affected caregivers' work schedules. CONCLUSIONS: It is anticipated this information will aid healthcare personnel to more effectively teach and initiate CIC in families, and in individuals learning for the first time. The findings should serve as the basis for conducting future patient satisfaction studies, which would determine the effectiveness and reproducibility of these approaches.

Is parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis associated with fewer infectious complications in stented, distal hypospadias repair?

INTRODUCTION: Judicious use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis is important for reducing antimicrobial resistance while preventing infectious surgical complications. In the setting of pediatric distal hypospadias repairs, it is unclear if antibiotic surgical prophylaxis is beneficial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of infectious complications in pediatric subjects undergoing distal hypospadias repair who received any peri-operative antibiotics to those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: This was a review of a retrospective cohort from a database of individuals undergoing hypospadias repairs evaluating whether they received peri-operative or post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis and determining the rate of infectious complications in those who did compared to those who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. Infectious complications were defined as surgical site infection (SSI) or urinary tract infection (UTI). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in infectious complication rates between individuals who received peri-operative parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not. All subjects with infectious complications received post-operative oral antibiotic prophylaxis. There was one instance of C. difficile infection in a subject who received peri-operative parenteral antibiotics. DISCUSSION: Reducing antibiotic utilization without increasing infectious surgical complications is important in safely reducing antimicrobial resistance. In this study of pediatric distal hypospadias repair, peri-operative antibiotics did not demonstrate a clear benefit and post-operative oral antibiotics demonstrated no benefit in preventing infectious complications. Other studies evaluating peri- and post-operative antibiotics for pediatric hypospadias repair have also failed to demonstrate a benefit for antibiotics in preventing infections. Practitioners should reconsider the use of antibiotics in this setting. CONCLUSION: Routine antibiotic prophylaxis does not appear beneficial for preventing infectious complications following uncomplicated, stented pediatric distal hypospadias repairs.