Comparison Between Closed Suction Drainage and No Drainage Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of closed suction drains after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is associated with lower wound complications in the first postoperative year as compared to no drain usage. METHODS: A total of 324 TAA were reviewed and included for analysis. One hundred forty-four did not have a postoperative drain placed, whereas 180 did have a postoperative drain. Demographic data, including age, sex, tobacco or alcohol use, and various medical comorbidities, were obtained. Follow-up data were collected and reviewed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks; 6 months; and 1 year postoperatively for minor and major wound complications, as well as wound-related reoperations. RESULTS: At the 2-week mark, the use of a drain demonstrated a significant increase in wound complications. No significant difference in wound complications was found at each subsequent follow-up visit. Within the first postoperative year, a total of 46 patients (31.9%) without drains and 69 patients (38.3%) with drains had a wound complication. This was not statistically significant. Most wound complications were minor, and no significant difference in reoperation rates occurred between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A postoperative closed suction drain may increase wound complications in the first 2 weeks after TAA and should therefore be used with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

An Evaluation of the Bacterial Adherence to Casting Materials.

INTRODUCTION:  The purpose of this study was to evaluate bacterial adherence to common casting materials including plaster of Paris (plaster), fiberglass, three-dimensional (3D) printed plastic, and silicone-coated 3D printed plastic. METHODS: The minimal inhibitory concentration of a phosphate-free detergent (Palmolive) needed to achieve total bacterial kill off was determined. 3D printed polylactic acid plastic samples were coated with silicone. Plaster, fiberglass, plastic, and silicone-coated plastic samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus. After bacterial inoculation, scanning electron microscopy of the samples was performed to visualize bacterial adherence to the materials' surface. Using either sterile water or a 5% detergent solution, the materials were subjected to washings. Each material was run in 30 replicates: 6 without washing, 6 with sterile water for 1 minute, 6 with detergent for 1 minute, 6 with sterile water for 3 minutes, and 6 with detergent for 3 minutes. The replicates that did not undergo a washing trial represented the initial bacterial inoculation. Samples were then rinsed and sonicated in polysorbate to isolate the remaining adherent bacteria on the materials' surface. The sonicated solutions were plated, incubated, and counted for quantification of colony forming units (CFU) of bacteria. This protocol was repeated for a total of four trials. RESULTS: During inoculation, there were significantly less bacteria that adhered to silicone-coated 3D printed plastic (58879 CFU) compared to plastic (217479 CFU), plaster (140063 CFU), and fiberglass (550546 CFU). Silicone coating showed further superiority. Silicone-coated 3D printed plastic was able to be decontaminated as demonstrated by significantly fewer remaining bacteria (9.3%) on its surface after being washed with a 5% detergent solution (1797 CFU) compared to sterile water (19321 CFU). The mean remaining bacteria on silicone-coated 3D printed plastic was significantly less than that remaining on all other materials when washed with either sterile water or a detergent solution for both durations of 1 minute and 3 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that significantly less bacteria adhere to the surface of 3D printed plastic with silicone coating showing added protection and that this material can be decontaminated to a greater degree with washing than conventional casting materials. These results provide evidence that 3D printed casts can be washed and successfully decontaminated during a patient's period of immobilization, which is advantageous especially during an infectious crisis such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

The Accuracy of 3D Printed Carpal Bones Generated from Cadaveric Specimens.

BACKGROUND: Computer assisted three-dimensional (3D) printing of anatomic models using advanced imaging has wide applications within orthopaedics. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3D printing accuracy of carpal bones. METHODS: Seven cadaveric wrists underwent CT scanning, after which select carpal bones (scaphoid, capitate, lunate, and trapezium) were dissected in toto. Dimensions including length, circumference, and volume were measured directly from the cadaver bones. The CT images were converted into 3D printable stereolithography (STL) files. The STL files were converted into solid prints using a commercially available 3D printer. The 3D printed models' dimensions were measured and compared to those of the cadaver bones. A paired t-test was performed to determine if a statistically significant difference existed between the mean measurements of the cadavers and 3D printed models. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the two groups were calculated to measure the degree of agreement. RESULTS: On average, the length and circumference of the 3D printed models were within 2.3 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively, of the cadaveric bones. There was a larger discrepancy in the volume measured, which on average was within 0.65 cc (15.9%) of the cadaveric bones. These differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There was strong agreement between all measurements except the capitate's length and lunate's volume. CONCLUSION: 3D printing can add value to patient care and improve outcomes. This study demonstrates that 3D printing can both accurately and reproducibly fabricate boney models that closely resemble the corresponding cadaveric anatomy.

Gastrointestinal Complications Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Rare but Have Severe Consequences.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are rare, but can result in substantial morbidity and mortality, especially when intervention is required. The purpose of this study is to identify modifiable risk factors for the development of GI complications and determine their impact on short-term outcomes following TJA. METHODS: We queried patients who underwent primary TJA at a single academic center from 2009 through 2018 and collected data on demographics, comorbidities, operative and perioperative details, and short-term outcomes. Patients who suffered at least one GI complication during the same hospitalization as their TJA were identified. The type of GI complication and intervention performed, if necessary, was recorded. Variables that independently affected the risk of GI complication were identified. Multivariate regression was performed to determine the effect suffering a GI complication had on outcomes. RESULTS: Of 17,402 patients, 106 (0.6%) suffered a GI complication. Constipation/obstruction, followed by diarrhea/malabsorption, hemorrhage, and Clostridium difficile were the most commonly reported complications. Patients suffering a GI complication were significantly older (68.5 vs 63.7, P < .001), less likely to use alcohol (49% vs 65%, P = .008), and had higher incidences of 8 of the 16 comorbidities analyzed (all P < .05). Patients with GI complications had greater lengths of stay (13.2 vs 2.3 days, P < .001), discharge to facility rates (58% vs 16%, P < .001), and in-hospital mortality rates (1.9% vs 0.1%, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Patients suffering a GI complication following TJA require longer hospital stays and greater post-acute care resources and have a substantially higher risk of mortality.