Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 135(1): 73-80, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25263233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether the quality of acute asthma care in US emergency departments (EDs) has improved over time. OBJECTIVES: We investigated changes in concordance of ED asthma care with 2007 National Institutes of Health guidelines, identified ED characteristics predictive of concordance, and tested whether higher concordance was associated with lower risk of hospitalization. METHODS: We performed chart reviews in ED patients aged 18 to 54 years with asthma exacerbations in 48 EDs during 2 time periods: 1997-2001 (2 prior studies) and 2011-2012 (new study). Concordance with guideline recommendations was evaluated by using item-by-item quality measures and composite concordance scores at the patient and ED levels; these scores ranged from 0 to 100. RESULTS: The analytic cohort comprised 4039 patients (2119 from 1997-2001 vs 1920 from 2011-2012). Over these 16 years, emergency asthma care became more concordant with level A recommendations at both the patient and ED levels (both P < .001). By contrast, concordance with non-level A recommendations (peak expiratory flow measurement and timeliness) decreased at both the patient (median score, 75 [interquartile range, 50-100] to 50 [interquartile range, 33-75], P < .001) and ED (mean score, 67 [SD, 7] to 50 [SD, 16], P < .001) levels. Multivariable analysis demonstrated ED concordance was lower in Southern and Western EDs compared with Midwestern EDs. After adjusting for severity, guideline-concordant care was associated with lower risk of hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.26-0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Between 1997 and 2012, we observed changes in the quality of emergency asthma care that differed by level of guideline recommendation and substantial interhospital and geographic variations. Greater concordance with guideline-recommended management might reduce unnecessary hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 2(6): 733-40, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25439365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the substantial burden of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits, there have been no recent multicenter efforts to characterize this high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize patients with asthma according to their frequency of ED visits and to identify factors associated with frequent ED visits. METHODS: A multicenter chart review study of 48 EDs across 23 US states. We identified ED patients ages 18 to 54 years with acute asthma during 2011 and 2012. Primary outcome was frequency of ED visits for acute asthma in the past year, excluding the index ED visit. RESULTS: Of the 1890 enrolled patients, 863 patients (46%) had 1 or more (frequent) ED visits in the past year. Specifically, 28% had 1 to 2 visits, 11% had 3 to 5 visits, and 7% had 6 or more visits. Among frequent ED users, guideline-recommended management was suboptimal. For example, of patients with 6 or more ED visits, 85% lacked evidence of prior evaluation by an asthma specialist, and 43% were not treated with inhaled corticosteroids. In a multivariable model, significant predictors of frequent ED visits were public insurance, no insurance, and markers for chronic asthma severity (all P < .05). Stronger associations were found among those with a higher frequency of asthma-related ED visits (eg, 6 or more ED visits). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study of US adults with acute asthma demonstrated many frequent ED users and suboptimal preventive management in this high-risk population. Future reductions in asthma morbidity and associated health care utilization will require continued efforts to bridge these major gaps in asthma care.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA