Pulmonary Adverse Events in Cancer Immunotherapy: Case Studies of CT Patterns.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have profoundly changed cancer treatment, improving the prognosis of many oncologic patients. However, despite the good efficacy of these drugs, their mechanism of action, which involves the activation of the immune system, can lead to immune-related adverse events, which may affect almost all organs. Pulmonary adverse events are relatively common, and potentially life-threatening complications may occur. The diagnosis is challenging due to the wide and non-specific spectrum of clinical and radiological manifestations. The role of the radiologist is to recognize and diagnose pulmonary immune-related adverse events, possibly even in the early stages, to estimate their extent and guide patients' management.

Noninfectious Granulomatous Lung Disease: Radiological Findings and Differential Diagnosis.

Granulomatous lung diseases (GLDs) are a heterogeneous group of pathological entities that can have different clinical presentations and outcomes. Granulomas are histologically defined as focal aggregations of activated macrophages, Langerhans cells, and lymphocytes, and may form in the lungs when the immune system cannot eliminate a foreign antigen and attempts to barricade it. The diagnosis includes clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, and radiological imaging, which especially consists of high-resolution computed tomography. bronchoalveolar lavage, transbronchial needle aspiration or cryobiopsy, positron emission tomography, while genetic evaluation can improve the diagnostic accuracy. Differential diagnosis is challenging due to the numerous different imaging appearances with which GLDs may manifest. Indeed, GLDs include both infectious and noninfectious, and necrotizing and non-necrotizing granulomatous diseases and the imaging appearance of some GLDs may mimic malignancy, leading to confirmatory biopsy. The purposes of our review are to report the different noninfectious granulomatous entities and to show their various imaging features to help radiologists recognize them properly and make an accurate differential diagnosis.

Non-A Non-B Acute Aortic Dissection: Is There Some Confusion in the Radiologist's Mind?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to define and determine the rate of acute non-A-non-B aortic dissections, and to evaluate CT angiography findings and possible complications, as well as to discuss management strategies and currently available therapy. Non-A non-B type of aortic dissection is still a grey area in the radiologist's mind, such that it is not entirely clear what should be reported and completed in terms of this disease. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study including 36 pre-treatment CT angiograms of consecutive patients (mean age: 61 years) between January 2012 and December 2022 with aortic dissection involving the aortic arch with/without the thoracic descending/abdominal aorta (type non-A non-B). RESULTS: According to the dissection anatomy, we identified three modalities of spontaneous acute non-A-non-B anatomical configurations. Configuration 1 (n = 25) with descending-entry tear and retrograde arch extension (DTA entry). Configuration 2 (n = 4) with Arch entry tear and isolated arch involvement (Arch alone). Configuration 3 (n = 7) with Arch entry and anterograde descending (±abdominal) aorta involvement (Arch entry). CT angiogram findings, management, and treatment options are described. CONCLUSIONS: Acute non-A non-B dissection represents an infrequent occurrence of aortic arch dissection (with or without involvement of the descending aorta) that does not extend to the ascending aorta. The complete understanding of its natural progression, distinct CT angiography subtypes, optimal management, and treatment strategies remains incomplete. Within our series, patients frequently exhibit a complex clinical course, often necessitating a more assertive approach to treatment compared to type B dissections.

Multidetector CT Imaging Biomarkers as Predictors of Prognosis in Shock: Updates and Future Directions.

A severe mismatch between the supply and demand of oxygen is the common sequela of all types of shock, which present a mortality of up to 80%. Various organs play a protective role in shock and contribute to whole-body homeostasis. The ever-increasing number of multidetector CT examinations in severely ill and sometimes unstable patients leads to more frequently encountered findings leading to imminent death, together called "hypovolemic shock complex". Features on CT include dense opacification of the right heart and major systemic veins, venous layering of contrast material and blood, densely opacified parenchyma in the right hepatic lobe, decreased enhancement of the abdominal organ, a dense pulmonary artery, contrast pooling in dependent lungs, and contrast stasis in pulmonary veins. These findings are biomarkers and prognostic indicators of paramount importance which stratify risk and improve patient outcomes. In this review, we illustrate the various CT patterns in shock and review the spectrum and prognostic significance of thoraco-abdominal vascular and visceral alarming signs of impending death with the intention of increasing awareness among radiologists and radiographers to prepare for immediate resuscitation when required.

Clinical value of high-resolution (5-17 MHz) echo-color Doppler (ECD) for identifying filling materials and assessment of damage or complications in aesthetic medicine/surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the role of echo-color-Doppler (ECD) imaging in identifying a series of characteristics pursuant to aesthetic filling material such as their degree of absorbability and their potential complications which include their propensity to stimulate the formation of encapsulated foreign-body granulomas. In the latter case, ECD can be of aid by giving indication for surgical therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, we studied 180 patients (60 ♂) who underwent an aesthetic medical/surgical treatment. We used ECD to evaluate the implant material, its thickness, the injection site, the integrity of dermal layers and the presence of any associated complications. RESULTS: In 97% (174/180) of our patients, we were able to identify the type of material used; furthermore, 57% of patients had a hyaluronic acid implant, 14% a lipofilling and 29% a non-absorbable filler (with 10% of silicone). In 6/180 (3%), we could not recognize the material used; 89% (161/180) of our patients presented post-injection complications; moreover, 67% showed peri-implant dermal-hypodermal thickening areas with adjacent lymphostasis, 6% displayed an abnormal implant site, and 17% showed inflammation with encapsulated foreign-body granulomas that required subsequent surgical excision. Biopsy samples were obtained from 37/180 patients (21%); among these, 31 patients had an ECD evidence of granuloma and on 6 patients we were not able to define the injected material. Histopathological examination identified 29 granulomas, 5 sterile abscesses and 3 chronic inflammations in the absence of granuloma. ECD showed an overall 78% diagnostic accuracy, with 90% sensitivity and 37% specificity in detecting filler granulomas. CONCLUSION: ECD is a low-cost technique that allows to identify filling materials and to assess the complications of an esthetic medical/surgical treatment.