RESUMEN
Purpose: The article is aimed at improving the understanding of the sociocultural profile of adult orthodontic patients and their expectations. In particular, it addresses three main aspects: the motivation and needs that underpin the decision to start orthodontic treatment, how it influences the patients' daily life, and the different oral hygiene demands. Materials and Methods: An online survey was completed by 276 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with different techniques. The questions asked concerned gender, age, type of appliance, any previous orthodontic treatments, type of any previous retainers, reasons for therapy, satisfaction, pain, problems in eating, daily number of teeth brushings and flossings before and during the treatment, perception of cost, sensation of visibility of the appliance, and if they would recommend orthodontic treatment. Results: A significant role within our sample is played by gender; 87.94% consisted of female patients out of which 72.57% wanted to improve their aesthetics, while only 54.84% of male patients cited the same reason. Invisible aligners were preferred by 67.70% of the patients due to them being considered the least painful, causing the fewest problems with eating, and the least visible. Metal braces were perceived as the less expensive treatment. Over a third of the patients (33.85%) had previously undergone orthodontic treatment, among them 54.05% wore a mobile retainer, 31.08% a fixed one, and 14.86% both. Daily tooth brushing and flossing increased during therapy with clear aligners by 48.94% and 126.39%, respectively. Conclusions: The greatest demand for orthodontic treatments comes from women, as they pay more attention to aesthetics, which makes the clear aligners the most common choice. The relapse after orthodontic treatment seems to cause a higher demand for retreatment, and oral hygiene habits significantly improve during orthodontic treatment, especially with the clear aligners.
Asunto(s)
Motivación , Aparatos Ortodóncicos Fijos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Percepción , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cepillado DentalRESUMEN
It is widely recognized that the physiology of childbirth labor largely depends on the interaction between three factors: a) the force generated by uterine contractions; b) the structure and characteristics of the birth canal and c) the fetus. Harmony between these three variables determines the initiation of maternal dynamic phenomena and the establishment of an optimal maternal-fetal balance in which both warrant for a correct delivery timing. The present study considered the above known factors and assessed if any other factor, still not recognized, could also play a role, and eventually modify the timing of delivery during the expulsive period. In particular, we focused our attention on the role played by the temporomandibular joint and dental occlusion on maternal body balance and on the stability of muscular reflected forces. The importance of assessing the temporomandibular function and the dental occlusion lies in the fact that any alteration in chewing or in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility and occlusion brings to relevant modifications on the vertebral column and pelvic girdle. Our hypothesis is based on the evidence that those women who have any kind of alteration in their dental occlusion, can have an altered capability of pushing during the expulsive period, as the force applied on the pelvic floor is not expressed. Moreover, recent studies have highlighted a relationship between temporomandibular dysfunctions and sleep apnea syndrome and between sleep apnea syndromes and pregnancy. These relationships are explored in this study.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión Dental , Contracción Uterina , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Articulación TemporomandibularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: the primary end point of our study was to define risk factors and identify the underlying conditions that may have led to the abuse of vasoconstrictors in rhinitis medicamentosa. Moreover, we analysed factors that may influence the vasoconstrictors discontinuation. METHODOLOGY: this was a prospective case-control observational study. Cases and controls were evaluated at the baseline in order define factors that may have influenced onset of rhinitis medicamentosa. They were re-evaluated at 3 months to verify symptoms control and drug discontinuation. Finally, they underwent a phone call questionnaire after 12 months regarding drug discontinuation. A potential bias of our study is that evaluating discontinuation we included subjects treated differently according to the main diagnosis. RESULTS: patients with rhinitis medicamentosa were more frequently smokers than controls, they had higher mean HAMA scores and positive psychiatric diseases history. Additionally, we frequently detected a local inflammation at nasal cytology in patients with rhinitis medicamentosa. A significant improvement in all nasal symptoms scores was observed in cases and controls but 29.4% of cases did not discontinue the vasoconstrictors. Two major factors negatively influenced discontinuation: positive nasal cytology and pathological HAMA score. CONCLUSION: we observed that positive local inflammation, anxiety and smoking habit correlate positively with vasoconstrictors abuse. In addition, we demonstrated that anxiety and local inflammation were the most important factors impairing drug discontinuation.