Comparison of efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine U-100/lixisenatide in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus using professional continuous glucose monitoring.

AIM/INTRODUCTION: Insulin glargine U100/lixisenatide and insulin degludec/liraglutide are fixed-ratio combinations containing basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist capable of reducing both fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels with a single formulation. This study aimed to compare the time in range (TIR) and the time below range (TBR) level 1 using professional continuous glucose monitoring and to establish criteria for the differential use of the fixed-ratio combinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (24 men and 12 women; average age, 62.1 years) were randomly assigned to the groups. At 0 and 18 weeks, a device was worn to compare the TIR and TBR level 1. The correlation between the C-peptide index at baseline and TIR at 18 weeks was assessed. RESULTS: The TIR and TBR level 1 showed no significant differences between the two groups. Both groups showed significant positive correlations between the C-peptide index and the TIR (P = 0.002, r = 0.679; P = 0.002, r = 0.681, respectively). The changes in glycemic variability, therapeutic indices, and body mass index were not significantly different among the groups (P > 0.05). The receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the cut-off values of the C-peptide index to achieve TIR of >70% at 18 weeks were 1.258 (sensitivity, 77.8%; specificity, 100%) and 1.099 (sensitivity, 57.1%; specificity, 90.9%) in the insulin glargine U100/lixisenatide and insulin degludec/liraglutide groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A TIR of >70% was achieved for both fixed-ratio combinations without significant differences.

Efficacy of IDegLira Versus IDegAsp Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study by isCGM.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) in controlling glucose fluctuation and suppressing postprandial glucose levels using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly allocated to receive either IDegLira or IDegAsp followed by IDegAsp or IDegLira, respectively. A crossover study was conducted with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring. We compared the postprandial blood glucose level, time in range, and time below range from a 3-day intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring period for each treatment group. RESULTS: The time in range was significantly higher in IDegLira than in IDegAsp. Postprandial glucose levels 90 and 120 min after breakfast and 60, 90, and 120 min after lunch were significantly lower for IDegLira than for IDegAsp. However, postprandial glucose levels 90 and 120 min after supper were significantly lower for IDegAsp than for IDegLira. There was no significant difference in the time below range between IDegLira and IDegAsp. CONCLUSION: IDegLira was more effective in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus than IDegAsp, as indicated by a higher time in range and lower postprandial glucose level at breakfast and lunch. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000039221).

Comparisons of efficacy and safety in insulin glargine and lixisenatide plus glulisine combination therapy with multiple daily injection therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Multiple daily injection therapy for early glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy (time in range of glucose level 70-180 mg/dL), safety (time below range level 1 of glucose <70 mg/dL), glycemic variability changes, therapeutic indices, body mass index and titration periods between multiple daily injection and insulin glargine U100 and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) combination (iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine; injected once daily [evenings]) therapies using intermittent continuous glucose monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to the iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine group or the multiple daily injection group. An intermittent continuous glucose monitoring system was attached, and each injection was adjusted to achieve the target glucose level according to the respective titration algorithm. Times in and below the range were analyzed using data collected on days 11-13 of the intermittent continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: The time in range did not significantly differ between the groups. However, the time below range level 1 was lower in the iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine group (P = 0.047). The changes in glycemic variability, therapeutic indices and body mass index were not significantly different between the groups, although the titration period was significantly shorter in the iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine group (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine combination therapy is safe and equally efficacious as multiple daily injection therapy for glycemic control, while avoiding hypoglycemia risk and reducing the number of injections are required.

Effects of Cyclophosphamide Pulse Therapy on the Clinical and Histopathological Findings, Particularly Crescent Formation, in a Patient with Adult-onset Steroid-refractory Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Nephritis.

A 29-year-old woman was diagnosed with Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) based on the presence of purpura and histopathological findings showing crescent formation, mesangial proliferation and IgA deposition in the glomerular mesangium. She was treated with high-dose steroids; however, the nephritic syndrome persisted. Therefore, we diagnosed her with steroid-resistant HSPN and decided to add treatment with cyclosphamide pulse therapy. After one year of treatment, the histopathological findings, including crescent formation and IgA deposition, improved, as confirmed on a renal biopsy, and the patient fulfilled the criteria for complete remission. Cyclophosphamide pulse therapy may be considered an effective treatment for intractable HSPN.

Changing profile of parenteral nutrition in pediatric surgery: a 30-year experience at one institute.

BACKGROUND: Due to technical refinements and steady advances in the development of highly sophisticated nutrient solutions consisting of optimal combinations of macronutrients and micronutrients, parenteral nutrition (PN) is now playing an important role in patient management. However, some PN-associated complications, such as catheter-related sepsis (CRS) and cholestasis, continue at high incidence, particularly in neonates. The objective of this study was to investigate the changing profiles of PN over the past 30 years in our department. METHODS: The medical records of 893 children (225 neonates, 245 infants, 261 preschool-age children, and 162 school-age children) who were placed on PN for >7 days in our department were reviewed, and the following data were extracted: birth weight, underlying disease, indications for PN, PN delivery route, type of catheter used, duration of PN, substrate and energy intake, type of amino acid solution used, and incidence of complications including CRS and liver dysfunction. The results were analyzed by dividing the patients into 3 groups according to their basic stages in management of PN and consisted of group 1 (1970 to 1979), group 2 (1980 to 1989), and group 3 (1990 to 1999). The parameters were compared in each group. RESULTS: The total number of patients in each group showed no significant difference; however, the percentage of low birth-weight neonates increased in group 3. In group 1, 85% of PN was administered through the peripheral vein; in group 2, 51.2%; and in group 3, 9.7%. The total calorie and nutrient intake decreased in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1, particularly regarding fat intake. In groups 1 and 2, commercially available amino acid solution based on the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization formula was usually used as the nitrogen source, but in group 3, it was changed to an amino acid solution for children. CRS decreased significantly, particularly in neonates, and occurred at a rate of 45.4% in group 1, 10.7% in group 2, and 1.5% in group 3. The incidence of liver dysfunction also showed a decrease: 35.7% in group 1, 22.3% in group 2, and 18.0% in group 3. A multivariate analysis showed a strong relationship between PN-related liver dysfunction and the duration of PN, the presence of infection, and the type of amino acid solution used. CONCLUSIONS: PN via central venous catheters has been regarded as safe and effective treatment in pediatric surgical patients. Over the past 30 years, the incidence of CRS has decreased. However, PN-related liver dysfunction remains a problem, particularly in patients receiving long-term PN.