Drug-drug interaction assessment based on a large-scale spontaneous reporting system for hepato- and renal-toxicity, and thrombocytopenia with concomitant low-dose methotrexate and analgesics use.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and is highly effective with low-dose intermittent administration. MTX is occasionally used in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen (APAP)/paracetamol for pain or inflammation control. With MTX treatment, the side effects, such as hepatotoxicity, renal failure, and myelosuppression should be considered. These are also seen with analgesics treatment. METHODS: We used a large spontaneously reported adverse event database (FAERS [JAPIC AERS]) to analyze whether the reporting of adverse events increased upon MTX and analgesic therapy in patients with RA. RESULTS: After identifying RA cases, the crude reporting odds ratios (cRORs) for hepatotoxicity, renal failure, and thrombocytopenia associated with the use of MTX, APAP, or NSAIDs were calculated by disproportionality analysis, which revealed significantly higher cRORs for these events. No analgesics showed consistent positive signals for drug-drug interaction (DDI) with concomitant low-dose MTX analyzed using four algorithms for DDI interaction (the Ω shrinkage measure, additive or multiplicative, and combination risk ratio models). However, in renal failure and thrombocytopenia, loxoprofen (Ω025 = 0.08) and piroxicam (Ω025 = 0.46), and ibuprofen (Ω025 = 0.74) and ketorolac (Ω025 = 3.52), respectively, showed positive signals in the Ω shrinkage measure model, and no consistency was found among adverse events or NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Studies using spontaneous reporting systems have limitations such as reporting bias or lack of patient background; however, the results of our comprehensive analysis support the results of previous clinical or epidemiological studies. This study also demonstrated the usefulness of FAERS for DDI assessment.

Methotrexate-related adverse events and impact of concomitant treatment with folic acid and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors: An assessment using the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Methotrexate (MTX) is an essential anti-rheumatic drug used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Prevention or management of adverse reactions, including interstitial lung disease (ILD), hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, and infection, remains fundamental for safe MTX therapy. Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (JAPIC AERS), we performed disproportionality analyses of adverse events related to MTX use and the impact of concomitant medications. Upon analyzing all reported cases in FAERS between 1997 and 2019, the crude reporting odds ratios (cRORs; 95% confidence intervals) for ILD, hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, and tuberculosis (TB) in relation to MTX use were 4.00 (3.83-4.17), 1.99 (1.96-2.02), 3.66 (3.58-3.74), and 7.97 (7.65-8.3), respectively. Combining MTX with folic acid (FA) or tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis) tended to reduce cRORs for these adverse events (except for TB). Multiple logistic regression analysis in patients with RA was conducted to calculate adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs) for age, sex, and MTX treatment patterns (MTX alone and combined with FA and TNFi). Higher age (except for hepatotoxicity) and male sex were significantly associated with adverse events. Combining FA or TNFi with MTX reduced aRORs for MTX-related hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression; in contrast, the effect of FA was not obvious in ILD or TB. Although studies assessing spontaneous reporting systems have limitations such as reporting bias, data from our logistic regression analysis demonstrated that adding FA to MTX-based therapy could help reduce the dose-dependent adverse events of MTX, thereby providing clinical evidence that supports the beneficial effect of FA. This study also demonstrated the usefulness of FAERS in comparing adverse events based on treatment patterns.

The association between concerns toward adverse reactions during pre-approval drug reviews and the post-approval addition of clinically significant adverse reactions to package inserts: A retrospective analysis of pre-approval drug review reports and safety updates.

PURPOSE: To determine if concerns toward adverse reactions (ARs) identified during the drug approval process are associated with their post-approval addition to package inserts. METHODS: Pre-approval concerns toward 24 target ARs were identified in the drug review reports and initial package inserts of 126 target drugs approved for use in Japan between April 2004 and March 2009. Each target drug was monitored for 5 years after approval for the addition of these ARs as clinically significant adverse reactions (CSARs) in the package inserts. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive value (NPVs) were calculated. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also analyzed to test the association between pre-approval concerns and post-approval CSAR additions. RESULTS: Target ARs with pre-approval concerns were added as CSARs in 88 of 406 AR-drug pairs (PPV: 21.7%). In contrast, target ARs without pre-approval concerns were added as CSARs in 93 of 2304 drugs (NPV: 96.0%). Hypoglycemia had the highest PPV (100%), whereas hepatitis and myocardial infarction had the lowest PPVs (0.0%). Abnormal hepatic function had the lowest NPV (85.4%), whereas myocardial infarction and convulsions had the highest NPVs (100%). Pre-approval concerns showed a significantly positive association with post-approval CSAR additions (OR: 6.57, 95% CI: 4.74, 9.11; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant association between pre-approval concerns and post-approval CSAR additions indicates that Japan's drug regulatory agency has generally conducted rigorous examination of the safety information available in the submitted data packages during drug review for approval.

[Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)'s new action for Pharmaceutical Affairs Consultation on Research and Development (R&D) Strategy].

Universities, research institutions, and venture capitals that possess promising "seed" research or technologies in Japan, are not always familiar with development strategies that lead to commercialization of the products in spite of their excellent science and research. In order to create innovative pharmaceuticals and medical devices originating from Japan, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) launched new scientific consultation service, named 'Pharmaceutical Affairs Consultation on R&D Strategy' for universities, research institutions, and venture capitals on July 1, 2011. Through these consultations, the guidance and advice on the tests needed in the early development stage and the necessary clinical trials would be provided toward commercialization.

[Social change and Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (PAL)].

Former Japanese pharmaceutical laws, originally based on the Pharmaceutical Marketing and Handling Regulations enacted in 1874 were in operation for many years before World War II. However, in order to address several drug issues, such as poor drug quality and insufficiences regarding the role of pharmacists during the War, the laws needed to be unified and revised. In this paper, we analyzed the record of discussions held by the Imperial Diet on the bill for the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law (PAL) in 1943. This is also regarded as the origin of the current PAL (LawNo.145 in 1960). Through this analysis, we tried to clarify the relationship between the social change and the role of PAL in society. During the War, the bill was discussed, aiming at the improvement of both human resources who treated drugs, and the quality of drug materials. Diet members discussed three main points, namely, "the duty of pharmacists", "the mission of the Japan Pharmaceutical Association" and "the quality control of pharmaceutical products". Notably, the bill pharmacists are required not only to dispense drugs, a role they had previously, but also to manage drug and food hygiene through the quality control of pharmaceutical products and the inspection of food and drink, in order to improve the public health in Japan. Originally, the law was passed to deal with the extraordinary circumstances during the War, but through our analysis, we found that they proactively improved the role of the law to comply with various drug issues raised during the War, the rapid change of the pharmaceutical hygiene concept and the social transformation.