Provider Educational Needs and Preferences Regarding Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care in a Pediatric Health System.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited evidence on educational needs and preferences of pediatric health care professionals regarding transition from pediatric to adult health care. METHODS: We distributed an anonymous online survey to physicians and advanced practice providers at a large, free-standing children's hospital and associated primary care network to assess attitudes, practices, and educational preferences about transition. We analyzed data with descriptive statistics, chi-square, and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 178 providers responded (20% response rate) across 31 specialties (66% attending physicians, 19% fellows, and 15% advanced practice providers). Less than half (43%) were comfortable in their knowledge of transition, with fellows reporting significantly lower comfort than attendings ( P < .05). In total, 47% reported annually discussing transition with their patients (fellows: 17% vs. attendings: 50%, P < .05). Educational topics of greatest interest included legal (71%) and financial concerns (69%), whereas preferred educational formats included Grand Rounds/lectures (68%) and webinars (63%). Facilitators to transition included lists of local adult providers for transition (89%), parent/family educational resources (88%), and a medical summary template in the electronic health record (85%). DISCUSSION: Major gaps exist in attitudes and practices related to transition. Identified educational strategies may serve as targets to improve the transition process through educational interventions.

Increasing Frequency of Affirmed Name and Pronoun Documentation in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In a previous study of 204 transgender and gender diverse youth in our region, 44% reported being made to feel uncomfortable in the emergency department (ED) because of their gender identity. The objective of our study was to conduct a 2 year quality improvement project to increase affirmed name and pronoun documentation in the pediatric ED. METHODS: Using process mapping, we identified 5 key drivers and change ideas. The key driver diagram was updated as interventions were implemented over 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Our primary outcome, the percentage of ED visits per month with pronouns documented, was plotted on a run chart with the goal of seeing a 50% increase in form completion from a baseline median of ∼14% over the 2 year study period. RESULTS: The frequency of pronoun documentation increased from a baseline median of 13.8% to a median of 47.8%. The most significant increase in pronoun documentation occurred in Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle 3, immediately after ED-wide dissemination of a near-miss case and subsequent call for improvement by ED leadership. Roughly 1.7% of all encounters during the study period involved patients whose pronouns were discordant from the sex listed in their electronic health record. CONCLUSIONS: This quality-improvement project increased the frequency of pronoun documentation in the ED. This has the potential to improve the quality of care provided to transgender and gender diverse youth in the ED setting and identify patients who may benefit from receiving a referral to a pediatric gender clinic for additional support.

Optimizing e-Consultations to Adolescent Medicine Specialists: Qualitative Synthesis of Feedback From User-Centered Design.

BACKGROUND: e-Consultations between primary care physicians and specialists are a valuable means of improving access to specialty care. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) face unique challenges in accessing limited adolescent medicine specialty care resources, which contributes to delayed or forgone care. e-Consultations between general pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists may alleviate these barriers to care. However, the optimal application of this model in adolescent medicine requires careful attention to the nuances of AYA care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to qualitatively analyze feedback obtained during the iterative development of an e-consultation system for communication between general pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists tailored to the specific health care needs of AYAs. METHODS: We conducted an iterative user-centered design and evaluation process in two phases. In the first phase, we created a static e-consultation prototype and storyboards and evaluated them with target users (general pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists). In the second phase, we incorporated feedback to develop a functional prototype within the electronic health record and again evaluated this with general pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists. In each phase, general pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists provided think-aloud feedback during the use of the prototypes and semistructured exit interviews, which was qualitatively analyzed to identify perspectives related to the usefulness and usability of the e-consultation system. RESULTS: Both general pediatricians (n=12) and adolescent medicine specialists (n=12) perceived the usefulness of e-consultations for AYA patients, with more varied perceptions of potential usefulness for generalist and adolescent medicine clinicians. General pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists discussed ways to maximize the usability of e-consultations for AYAs, primarily by improving efficiency (eg, reducing documentation, emphasizing critical information, using autopopulated data fields, and balancing specificity and efficiency through text prompts) and reducing the potential for errors (eg, prompting a review of autopopulated data fields, requiring physician contact information, and prompting explicit discussion of patient communication and confidentiality expectations). Through iterative design, patient history documentation was streamlined, whereas documentation of communication and confidentiality expectations were enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: Through an iterative user-centered design process, we identified user perspectives to guide the refinement of an e-consultation system based on general pediatrician and adolescent medicine specialist feedback on usefulness and usability related to the care of AYAs. Qualitative analysis of this feedback revealed both opportunities and risks related to confidentiality, communication, and the use of tailored documentation prompts that should be considered in the development and use of e-consultations with AYAs.

Racial Diversity Among American Cardiologists: Implications for the Past, Present, and Future.

In the United States, race-based disparities in cardiovascular disease care have proven to be pervasive, deadly, and expensive. African American/Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Native/Indigenous American individuals are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and are less likely to receive high-quality, evidence-based medical care as compared with their White American counterparts. Although the United States population is diverse, the cardiovascular workforce that provides its much-needed care lacks diversity. The available data show that care provided by physicians from racially diverse backgrounds is associated with better quality, both for minoritized patients and for majority patients. Not only is cardiovascular workforce diversity associated with improvements in health care quality, but racial diversity among academic teams and research scientists is linked with research quality. We outline documented barriers to achieving workforce diversity and suggest evidence-based strategies to overcome these barriers. Key strategies to enhance racial diversity in cardiology include improving recruitment and retention of racially diverse members of the cardiology workforce and focusing on cardiovascular health equity for patients. This review draws attention to academic institutions, but the implications should be considered relevant for nonacademic and community settings as well.