Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses. RESULTS: A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.

Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are beneficial in proctocolectomy, but their impact on robotic low rectal proctectomy is not fully investigated. This study assessed the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes and cost of robotic (RTME) versus laparoscopic (LTME) total mesorectal excision. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with rectal cancer in a single French tertiary centre for three yearly periods: 2011, LTME; 2015, RTME; and 2018, RTME with ERAS. Patient characteristics, operative and postoperative data, and costs were compared among the groups. RESULTS: A total of 220 consecutive proctectomies were analysed (71 LTME, 58 RTME and 91 RTME with ERAS). A prevalence of lower and locally advanced tumours was observed with RTME. The median duration of surgery increased with the introduction of RTME, but became shorter than that for LTME with greater robotic experience (226, 233 and 180 min for 2011, 2015 and 2018 respectively; P < 0·001). The median duration of hospital stay decreased significantly for RTME with ERAS (11, 10 and 8 days respectively; P = 0·011), as did the overall morbidity rate (39, 38 and 16 per cent; P = 0·002). Pathology results, conversion and defunctioning stoma rates remained stable. RTME alone increased the total cost by €2348 compared with LTME. The introduction of ERAS and improved robotic experience decreased costs by €1960, compared with RTME performed in 2015 without ERAS implementation. In patients with no co-morbidity, costs decreased by €596 for RTME with ERAS versus LTME alone. CONCLUSION: ERAS is associated with cost reductions in patients undergoing robotic proctectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: Las vías clínicas ERAS son beneficiosas en la proctocolectomía, pero su impacto en la proctectomía rectal baja robótica no se ha investigado exhaustivamente. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la vía clínica ERAS sobre los resultados y el coste de la proctectomía robótica (resección total del mesorrecto robótica, robotic total mesorectal excision, RTME) versus procedimientos laparoscópicos de resección total del mesorrecto (laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, LTME). MÉTODOS: Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con cáncer de recto tratados en un único centro terciario francés durante un periodo de tres años: 1) 2011: resección total del mesorrecto laparoscópica (LTME); 2) 2015: TME robótica y 3) 2018: TME robótica plus ERAS. Se compararon las características de los pacientes, los datos operatorios y postoperatorios, y los costes entre subgrupos utilizando análisis estadísticos. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 220 proctectomías consecutivas que incluían 71 LTME, 58 RTME y 91 RTME plus ERAS. Se observó un predominio de tumores inferiores y localmente avanzados en la RTME. La mediana del tiempo operatorio aumentó con la introducción de RTME, pero llegó a ser inferior que en la LTME con una mayor experiencia robótica (226, 233 y 180 minutos para los periodos 1, 2 y 3, respectivamente; P = 0,0001). La mediana de la estancia hospitalaria disminuyó significativamente con la RTME plus ERAS (11, 10 y 8 días; P = 0,01), así como la morbilidad global (40%, 38% y 16%; P = 0,002). Los resultados de la anatomía patológica, las tasas de conversión y de estomas de protección permanecieron estables. La RTME sola aumentó el coste total en €2.348 comparado con la LTME. La introducción de ERAS y una mejora en la experiencia robótica disminuyeron los costes en €1.960 versus RTME realizada en 2015 sin la implementación de ERAS. En pacientes sin comorbilidades, los costes disminuyeron en €1.196 con RTME plus ERAS versus LTME sola. CONCLUSIÓN: ERAS se asocia con reducciones de coste en la proctectomía robótica.

Descriptive epidemiology of 13,038 newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed meningiomas in France: 2006-2010.

PURPOSE: This work describes the clinical epidemiology and pathology for patients undergoing surgery for newly diagnosed meningiomas in France between 2006 and 2010. METHODS: The methodology is based on a multidisciplinary national network previously established by the French Brain Tumor DataBase (FBTDB) (in French: Recensement national histologique des tumeurs primitives du système nerveux central [RnhTPSNC]), and the active participation of the scientific societies involved in neuro-oncology in France. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2010, 13,038 incident cases of meningioma with histological validation were identified and analyzed (9769 women, 3269 men, resection 98.2%, cryopreservation 20.5%). For each histological subtype of meningioma (meningothelial, fibrous, transitional, psammomatous, angiomatous, rare variety, microcystic, secretory, lymphoplasmacyte-rich, clear-cell, chordoid, rhabdoid, metaplastic, atypical, papillary, anaplastic and not otherwise specified), number of cases, sex, median age, cryopreservation and surgery were reported. Among the various histological subtypes, atypical meningioma (grade II) slightly, but significantly, increased after 2007. Headache, sensory-motor impairments and seizures were the most frequent clinical symptoms. Time between the first clinical symptom and surgery ranged from 0 to 314 months, and was <3 months in 37% of cases. At the time of surgery, 9% of patients were asymptomatic. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Given the number of meningiomas not histologically-validated, we can estimate that the gross incidence rate for meningiomas operated in France is about 4.2 per 100,000 person/year. To our knowledge, this work is the most important study evaluating the different subtypes of meningiomas and it validates the relevance of histological databases for central nervous system tumors.

Day-care for breast cancer: ambulatory surgery and intra-operative radiation. Techniques and preliminary results of the Centre Val-d'Aurelle--Montpellier.

One-day breast carcinoma treatment is defined as association of ambulatory surgery and intra-operative irradiation. Selection and rigorous process of patients is the key to success. The surgical technique is not changed by the radiotherapy. Patient's satisfaction index is very high. Financial loss should not be a hurdle to its implementation.

[French brain tumor database: general results on 40,000 cases, main current applications and future prospects]. / Recensement national histologique des tumeurs primitives du système nerveux central : résultats généraux sur 40 000 cas, principales applications actuelles et perspectives.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This work aimed at prospectively record all primary central nervous system tumor (PCNST) cases in France, for which histological diagnosis was available. The objectives were to (i) create a national database and network to perform epidemiological studies, (ii) implement clinical and basic research protocols, and (iii) harmonize the health care of patients affected by PCNST. METHODS: The methodology is based on a multidisciplinary national network already established by the French Brain Tumor DataBase (FBTDB) (Recensement national histologique des tumeurs primitives du système nerveux central [RnhTPSNC]), and the active participation of the Scientific Societies involved in neuro-oncology in France. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2009, 43,929 cases of newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed PCNST have been recorded. Histological diagnoses included gliomas (42,4%), all other neuroepithelial tumors (4,4%), tumors of the meninges (32,3%), nerve sheath tumors (9,2%), lymphomas (3,4%) and others (8,3%). Cryopreservation was reported for 9603 PCNST specimens. Tumor resections were performed in 78% cases, while biopsies accounted for 22%. Median age at diagnosis, sex, percentage of resections and number of cryopreserved tumors were detailed for each histology, according to the WHO classification. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Many current applications and perspectives for the FBTDB are illustrated in the discussion. To our knowledge, this work is the first database in Europe, dedicated to PCNST, including clinical, surgical and histological data (with also cryopreservation of the specimens), and which may have major epidemiological, clinical and research implications.

[Incidence and mortality of central nervous system tumors in France: trends over the period 1978-2000 and influence of registration practices on results]. / Incidence et mortalité des tumeurs du système nerveux central en France: évolution de 1978 à 2000 et influence des pratiques d'enregistrement sur les résultats.

BACKGROUND: In France, cancer incidence figures are produced by cancer registries covering only 13.5% to 16% of the whole population of the country. Thus, to produce national figures, estimates have to be computed. Registration disparities between registries concerning tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS) could have biased these estimates. METHODS: National estimates are based on modelling of the incidence/mortality ratio. The most recent estimations for year 2000 were calculated by the French Cancer Registry Network (FRANCIM) and the department of biostatistics of Lyon University Hospital. Since benign tumors are not recorded in some cancer registries, a new estimate of the incidence of CNS tumors was produced by estimating the number of benign tumors in these registries. RESULTS: In 2000 in France, the number of estimated cases of CNS tumors was 2697 in men and 2602 in women, with incidence rates (World standard) of 7.4 and 6.4 per 100,000 respectively. The incidence increased between 1978 and 2000, on an average by 2.25% per year in men and 3.01% per year in women. However, these estimates do not provide a correct picture of CNS incidence. First of all, pathological diagnoses are not performed in 3.5%-27.5% of the patients with CNS tumors registered in French registries. Second, figures for benign tumors (mainly meningiomas) were provided by only two of nine cancer registries. If benign tumors had been registered by all cancer registries, computed incidence would have increased by 12% for men and 26% for women. CONCLUSION: Incidence of CNS tumors is increasing in France, as in many other countries. To improve comparability with other countries, French cancer registries should also collect data on benign tumors. The discrepancies observed between registries in the proportion of patients without information on histology show differences in diagnostic practices and should be the starting point for a survey on this topic.

A controlled "before-after" study: impact of a clinical guidelines programme and regional cancer network organization on medical practice.

A regional cancer network has been set up in the Rhône-Alpes region in France. The aim of the project is to improve the quality of care and to rationalize prescriptions in the network. In this network, we assessed the impact of the implementation of a clinical practice guidelines project by assessing the conformity of practice with the guidelines and comparing this with the conformity in an external matched control group from another French region without a regional cancer network. Four hospitals (private and public) accepted to assess the impact of the clinical practice guidelines on the management of breast and colon cancer in the experimental group and three hospitals (private and public) in the control group. In 1994 and 1996, women with non-metastatic breast cancer (282 and 346 patients in the experimental group, 194 and 172 patients in the control group, respectively) and all new patients with colon cancer (95 and 94 patients in the experimental group, and 89 and 118 patients in the control group, respectively) were selected. A controlled "before-after" study, using institutional medical records of patients with breast and colon cancer. The medical decisions concerning the patients were analyzed to assess their compliance with the clinical practice guidelines. When medical decisions were judged to be non-compliant, we verified if they were based on scientific evidence in a published article, if they were not, the medical decision was classified as having "no convincing supporting scientific evidence". The compliance rates were significantly higher in 1996 than in 1994 in the experimental group; 36% (126 out of 346) vs 12% (34 out of 282) and 46% (56 out of 123) vs 14% (14 out of 103) (P<0.001) for breast and colon cancer, respectively. Whereas, in the control group the compliance rates were the same for the two periods; 7% (12 out of 173) vs 6% (12 out of 194) (P=0.46) and 39% (49 out of 126) vs 32% (31 out of 96), P=0.19. In the experimental group, in 1994, 101 of the 282 medical decisions (36%) and 27 of the 103 (26%) for breast and colon cancer, respectively, were classified as having "no convincing supporting scientific evidence" compare with 72 out of 346 in 1996 (21%) for breast cancer, and 21 of the 123 (17%) for colon cancer P<0.05. Whereas in the control group these results were 106 out of 194 in 1994 (55%) and 90 out of 172 in 1996 (52%), P=0.65 for breast cancer and 28 out of 96 in 1994 (29%) and 30 out of 126 in 1996 (24%), P=0.36 for colon cancer. The development and implementation strategy of the clinical practice guidelines programme for cancer management results in significant changes in medical practice in our cancer network. These results would suggest that introducing guidelines with specific implementation strategy might also increase the compliance rate with the guideline and "evidence-based medicine".

Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with resected colorectal carcinoma, lymph node involvement has particular importance for patient prognosis and adjuvant therapy. The network of French cancer registries (FRANCIM) established a study aimed at analyzing the validity of lymph node harvest reporting in a population-based sample. METHODS: The study population was comprised of 1081 resected tumors without distant visceral metastasis and classified using the TNM system. Correlation between the number of examined lymph nodes and the staging of the tumor was examined by logistic regression analysis to establish an estimate of the minimum number of lymph nodes required to determine whether a tumor is lymph node negative. RESULTS: An average of 7.7 +/- 0.2 lymph nodes were examined per specimen in the 851 patients for whom the number of lymph nodes examined was known. The proportion of cases classified as N+ increased significantly with the number of examined lymph nodes (chi-square trend = 24.6; P < 0.0001). If the probability of correct lymph node status assessment is 1 in the reference group (comprised of pathology reports of specimens with > or = 16 examined lymph nodes), the probability of correct N+/N- dichotomization was significantly < 1 for the 1 to 3 lymph nodes group and the 4 to 7 lymph nodes group (i.e., 53.7% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: To comply with current rules for adjuvant chemotherapy, surgeons must provide pathologists with at least eight lymph nodes for optimal N+/N- dichotomization to reduce the risk of misclassification and understaging.

[Anorectal malignant melanomas. Apropos of 5 cases. Review of the literature]. / Les mélanomes malins anorectaux. A propos de 5 cas: revue de la littérature.

This study reports five cases of anorectal melanoma treated at Centre Val d'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque in Montpellier. There follows a discussion based upon the literature of epidemiological, clinical, histopathological and therapeutic aspects. Surgery is the treatment of choice but there is major controversy regarding the best method. The decisive prognostic factor appears to be the stage of the disease rather than the type of treatment. The role of radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy remains to be evaluated.

Herault breast screening programme: results after 30 months of a mobile French schedule.

Breast screening in the Herault Department (France) has been carried out since July 1990. As with other French programmes, it is a population-based screen, whose main features are related to its organization in that: (a) it is performed by a specific unit (the 'Institut Montpelliérain d'Imagerie Medico-Biologique'); and (b) the group of women targeted is those aged 40-70 years. The two-view mammography is performed every 2 years in mobile units. This paper presents the results after 30 months: 26,026 participants were screened from a target population of 52,617 women, giving a participation rate of 49%. The recall rate and the biopsy rate observed were 7% and 1.5%, respectively. The predictive positive value was 8.4% for a positive test while it was 35% for the biopsy; the values increased with age. 137 cancers were observed giving a detection rate of 5.3%, of which 82% were in situ. Small (< or = to 10 mm) tumours represented 41.5%, and 71.5% of the cancers were node negative. The surgical treatment was conservative for 66% of them.