Difference in the early postoperative change of the joint line convergence angle between opening wedge and closed wedge high tibial osteotomies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correction error associated with soft tissue balance in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and the difference between opening wedge HTO (OWHTO) and closed wedge HTO (CWHTO). METHODS: A total of 170 knees of 130 patients (85 knees of 68 patients in OWHTO and 85 knees of 62 patients in CWHTO) were evaluated. Anteroposterior radiographs of the knee and full-length leg were taken preoperatively, immediately under general anesthesia postoperatively, 2 days, and 1 and 12 months postoperatively. The femorotibial angle (FTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured. RESULTS: The postoperative FTA was decreased from 170.5 ± 2.1° at 0 day to 168.6 ± 2.2° at 2 days in OWHTO (P < 0.05), whereas it was not changed from 168.7 ± 2.4° at 0 day to 168.1 ± 2.8° at 2 days in CWHTO. The JLCA was 4.8 ± 1.8° preoperatively, 4.2 ± 1.9° at 0 day, 2.2 ± 1.8° at 2 days (P < 0.05 vs 0 day), 2.6 ± 1.7° at 1 month, and 2.7 ± 1.6° at 12 months in OWHTO, and 7.1 ± 3.2° preoperatively, 4.1 ± 2.4° at 0 day (P < 0.05 vs preoperative), 3.4 ± 2.5° at 2 days, 3.9 ± 2.3° at 1 month, and 4.2 ± 2.6° at 12 months in CWHTO. Multiple regression analysis showed that preoperative factors affecting change of the JLCA from preoperative to postoperative 1 month were the correction angle in OWHTO (P = 0.001) and the preoperative standing JLCA in OWHTO (P < 0.001) and CWHTO (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease of the JLCA occurred immediately after osteotomy under anesthesia in CWHTO, whereas in OWHTO there was no decrease under anesthesia, but it decreased several days postoperatively.

Increased contact area of flange and decreased wedge volume of osteotomy site by open wedge distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy compared to the conventional technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the area of the osteotomy surface, including the flange and wedge volume, in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (DTO), and distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy (DTAO) using tibial sawbones. It was hypothesized that the area of the osteotomy surface, including the flange, in DTAO was larger than that in OWHTO and DTO and that the wedge volume in DTAO was smaller than that in OWHTO and DTO. METHODS: Fifteen tibial sawbones were divided equally into three groups: OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO. The total area of the osteotomy surface in OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO was compared using image analysis software. The contact area of the flange and the wedge volume at wedge heights of 5, 10, and 15 mm were compared among osteotomy types. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the total area of the osteotomy surface, the contact area of the flange, and the wedge volume at 5, 10, and 15 mm in OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO. RESULTS: The total area of the osteotomy surface in DTO and DTAO was significantly larger than that in OWHTO (P < 0.05). The contact area of the flange in DTAO was significantly larger than that in OWHTO at each wedge height (P < 0.05). In addition, the contact area of the flange in DTAO was significantly larger than that in DTO at wedge heights of 5 and 15 mm (P < 0.05). The wedge volume in DTAO was significantly smaller than that in DTO at each wedge height (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that an increase in the flange contact area and a decrease in the wedge volume in the opening gap were found in DTAO compared to DTO. This would be an advantage for anteroposterior screw insertion from the flange to the distal tibial fragment and bone union at the osteotomy site.

Status of fracture risk assessment and osteoporosis treatment in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at a high risk of major osteoporosis (OP)-related fractures and the status of OP-related medical treatment for these patients. METHODS: We enrolled 120 patients aged ≥40 years (average, 69.1 years) with RA. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) was used to evaluate the fracture risk. Of the 120 patients, the femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated in 102 patients, and their FRAX® scores were calculated alongside the BMD values. Patients observed to be at a high risk of a major OP-related fracture (10-year probability >20% or hip fracture risk >3%), according to FRAX®, were identified as those requiring OP treatment; medication ratio for OP (percentage of patients actually receiving medication among patients requiring OP treatment) was assessed. RESULTS: OP treatment was indicated in 75 (63%) patients; the medication ratio for OP was 49%. The use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids showed a positive effect; however, the use of methotrexate showed a negative effect on the medication ratio. CONCLUSION: The number of potential patients requiring OP treatment is underestimated. All patients with RA should be assessed to determine their eligibility for OP treatment.