Presenteeism in front-line physicians involved in COVID-19-related clinical practice: a national survey of employed physician members of the Japan Medical Association.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have increased the rate of presenteeism among front-line physicians. Presenteeism is the term used to describe attendance at work despite ill health that would normally prompt rest or absence from work. This study aimed to examine the associations between COVID-19 clinical practice and presenteeism among physicians. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to January 2022. The questionnaires were distributed to 21,737 employed physicians who were members of the Japan Medical Association. Presenteeism was measured by the Work Functioning Impairment Scale. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between COVID-19 clinical practice and presenteeism. RESULTS: Overall, 3,968 participants were included in the analysis, and presenteeism was observed in 13.9% of them. The rate of presenteeism significantly increased with both the number of COVID-19 patients treated and the percentage of work time spent treating these patients (both P values for trend < 0.001). In comparison to those not currently engaged in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, presenteeism was significantly higher among front-line (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-2.53) and second-line physicians supporting those in the front-line (aOR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.17-1.78). There was no association between involvement in COVID-19 vaccination services and presenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: The burden on front-line and second-line physicians in COVID-19 clinical practice must be minimized. Employed physicians also need to recognize the importance of communicating with their workplaces about presenteeism.

Working hours, side work, and depressive symptoms in physicians: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Long working hours in Japan is a social concern. This is also true for the working hours of physicians, who often do side work in addition to working at their main hospital. New physician work regulations to be implemented in Japan require work-hour management, including side work. This study examined the association between physicians' overtime and side work hours and their health outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from a survey of working physicians conducted by the Japan Medical Association from 2021 to 2022. Questionnaires completed by 2906 full-time working physicians aged 24-69, excluding junior resident doctors, were analyzed. Depressive symptoms and the presence of thoughts of death or suicide using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Japanese version was used to assess health outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was performed using overtime at the main place of employment and side work hours as exposure factors. RESULTS: Both depressive symptoms and thoughts of death or suicide increased in the group with longer overtime hours at the main place of work. A similar tendency was observed for side work but adjusting for overtime hours eliminated the association. In other words, total working hours had an impact on health, regardless of whether overtime work at the main place of employment or side work. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the existence of multiple hurdles to managing working hours, including side work, the working environment for physicians needs to be improved to protect their health and quality of medical care.

[Analysis of occupational health activities through classifying reports from medical facilities in Japan].

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to analyze current trends in occupational health activities by classifying reports from medical facilities in Japan. METHODS: Reports of current workplace-level occupational health activities from medical activities that were collected by the Japan Medical Association Occupational Health Committee were used for the study. Of 5,000 questionnaire forms sent to medical facilities, 1,920 responses were returned. The freely described reports on ongoing occupational health activities contained in these responses were classified according to each of the following aspects of reported activities: 1) details of occupational health activities including main actors in workplace-level actions; and 2) approaches taken for occupational safety and health. The classification of the reports was implemented by a working group comprising selected occupational health practitioners and researchers. RESULTS: Among 1,920 survey responses, 581 valid texts were analyzed. Altogether, 1,044 occupational health activities currently undertaken by the facilities were extracted. The reported activities that were classified according to details of occupational health activities mainly comprised "Measures for preventing overwork, labor management, and work-style reform" (35.7%), "Measures for improving mental health" (21.0%), and "Review of occupational safety and health management systems" (19.3%). Medical facilities implementing "Measures for mental health" alongside "Measures for preventing overwork, labor management, and work-style reform" were reported in 13.2% of the responding medical facilities. "Occupational health professionals or safety and health management staff" (71.7%) were the most frequent main actors of these activities, followed by "Members of the workplace" (18.4%) and "Outsourced experts" (2.4%). "Comprehensive safety and health management" (42.0%) was the most common approach taken for occupational safety and health, followed by "Management focusing on topics" (23.8%) and "Case management" (16.5%). Most of these activities focused on primary prevention aimed at labor management including prevention of overwork, work-style reform, and mental health promotion. Another key trend could be "Teamwork among occupational safety and health staff, workers, and employers at respective workplaces as well as outsourced experts." DISCUSSION: Several key trends were extracted from current occupational health activities at medical facilities. In most cases, these measures were implemented simultaneously. This suggests the importance of combining primary prevention measures for mental health with measures for labor management including prevention of overwork. These activities reflect emerging trends that incorporate teamwork between experts, workers, and employers, and provide new perspectives on workplace-level occupational safety and health activities.