Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 35(6): 1411-1417, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32304001

RESUMEN

Peri-implant disease may affect survival of dental implants. The aim of the study is to analyze the effectiveness of diode laser as a supportive modality to the non-surgical conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PiM) and initial peri-implantitis (PI). Twenty-three patients with single implants suffering from PiM or initial PI were selected and randomly divided into two groups; control group (CG) received non-surgical conventional treatment, and test group (TG) received non-surgical conventional treatment and diode laser application with wavelength of 980 nm. Probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at baseline (T0) and at 3 months follow-up (T1). The average of PPD value for TG was 4.04 ± 0.54 mm at T0 and it was 2.98 ± 0.70 mm at T1. In the CG, PPD average was 3.8 ± 1.24 mm at T0 and was 3.54 ± 0.35 mm at T1. In TG, the BOP was positive in 44 sites at T0 and in 6 sites at T1. In CG, the BOP was positively observed in 52 sites at T0 and in 28 sites at T1. The 980-nm diode laser may be considered an adjunct to the conventional non-surgical treatments of PiM and initial PI.


Asunto(s)
Láseres de Semiconductores/uso terapéutico , Mucositis/cirugía , Periimplantitis/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucositis/complicaciones , Periimplantitis/complicaciones , Bolsa Periodontal/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA