In silico methods for immunogenicity risk assessment and human homology screening for therapeutic antibodies.

In silico immunogenicity risk assessment has been an important step in the development path for many biologic therapeutics, including monoclonal antibodies. Even if the source of a given biologic is 'fully human', T cell epitopes that are contained in the sequences of the biologic may activate the immune system, enabling the development of anti-drug antibodies that can reduce drug efficacy and may contribute to adverse events. Computational tools that identify T cell epitopes from primary amino acid sequences have been used to assess the immunogenic potential of therapeutic candidates for several decades. To facilitate larger scale analyses and accelerate preclinical immunogenicity risk assessment, our group developed an integrated web-based platform called ISPRI, (Immunogenicity Screening and Protein Re-engineering Interface) that provides hands-on access through a secure web-based interface for scientists working in large and mid-sized biotech companies in the US, Europe, and Japan. This toolkit has evolved and now contains an array of algorithms that can be used individually and/or consecutively for immunogenicity assessment and protein engineering. Most analyses start with the advanced epitope mapping tool (EpiMatrix), then proceed to identify epitope clusters using ClustiMer, and then use a tool called JanusMatrix to define whether any of the T cell epitope clusters may generate a regulatory T cell response which may diminish or eliminate anti-drug antibody formation. Candidates can be compared to similar products on a normalized immunogenicity scale. Should modifications to the biologic sequence be an option, a tool for moderating putative immunogenicity by editing T cell epitopes out of the sequence is available (OptiMatrix). Although this perspective discusses the in-silico immunogenicity risk assessment for monoclonal antibodies, bi-specifics, multi-specifics, and antibody-drug conjugates, the analysis of additional therapeutic modalities such as enzyme replacement proteins, blood factor proteins, CAR-T, gene therapy products, and peptide drugs is also made available on the ISPRI platform.

ISPRI (Interactive Screening and Protein Reengineering Interface): Integrated, cloud-based, comprehensive toolkit for Immunogenicity Risk Assessment.EpiMatrix Immunogenicity Score: Combined T effector and Treg Epitope Content per unit protein.Tregitopes: Treg Epitopes found in IgG Framework that have been shown to modulate antigen-specific effector T cell responses.ClustiMer: Tool for identifying epitope rich polypeptides from within a given protein sequence.JanusMatrix: Tool for Predicting Tolerance, Putative Treg Epitopes, and Anti-self-immune responses.OptiMatrix: Tool for modifying T cell epitope sequences to reduce (or enhance) MHC binding.

Does human homology reduce the potential immunogenicity of non-antibody scaffolds?

Biologics developers are moving beyond antibodies for delivery of a wide range of therapeutic interventions. These non-antibody modalities are often based on 'natural' protein scaffolds that are modified to deliver bioactive sequences. Both human-derived and non-human-sourced scaffold proteins have been developed. New types of "non-antibody" scaffolds are still being discovered, as they offer attractive alternatives to monoclonals due to their smaller size, improved stability, and ease of synthesis. They are believed to have low immunogenic potential. However, while several human-sourced protein scaffolds have not been immunogenic in clinical studies, this may not predict their overall performance in other therapeutic applications. A preliminary evaluation of their potential for immunogenicity is warranted. Immunogenicity risk potential has been clearly linked to the presence of T "helper" epitopes in the sequence of biologic therapeutics. In addition, tolerogenic epitopes are present in some human proteins and may decrease their immunogenic potential. While the detailed sequences of many non-antibody scaffold therapeutic candidates remain unpublished, their backbone sequences are available for review and analysis. We assessed 12 example non-antibody scaffold backbone sequences using our epitope-mapping tools (EpiMatrix) for this perspective. Based on EpiMatrix scoring, their HLA DRB1-restricted T cell epitope content appears to be lower than the average protein, and sequences that may act as tolerogenic epitopes are present in selected human-derived scaffolds. Assessing the potential immunogenicity of scaffold proteins regarding self and non-self T cell epitopes may be of use for drug developers and clinicians, as these exciting new non-antibody molecules begin to emerge from the preclinical pipeline into clinical use.

In silico Immunogenicity Assessment for Sequences Containing Unnatural Amino Acids: A Method Using Existing in silico Algorithm Infrastructure and a Vision for Future Enhancements.

The in silico prediction of T cell epitopes within any peptide or biologic drug candidate serves as an important first step for assessing immunogenicity. T cell epitopes bind human leukocyte antigen (HLA) by a well-characterized interaction of amino acid side chains and pockets in the HLA molecule binding groove. Immunoinformatics tools, such as the EpiMatrix algorithm, have been developed to screen natural amino acid sequences for peptides that will bind HLA. In addition to commonly occurring in synthetic peptide impurities, unnatural amino acids (UAA) are also often incorporated into novel peptide therapeutics to improve properties of the drug product. To date, the HLA binding properties of peptides containing UAA are not accurately estimated by most algorithms. Both scenarios warrant the need for enhanced predictive tools. The authors developed an in silico method for modeling the impact of a given UAA on a peptide's likelihood of binding to HLA and, by extension, its immunogenic potential. In silico assessment of immunogenic potential allows for risk-based selection of best candidate peptides in further confirmatory in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assays, thereby reducing the overall cost of immunogenicity evaluation. Examples demonstrating in silico immunogenicity prediction for product impurities that are commonly found in formulations of the generic peptides teriparatide and semaglutide are provided. Next, this article discusses how HLA binding studies can be used to estimate the binding potentials of commonly encountered UAA and "correct" in silico estimates of binding based on their naturally occurring counterparts. As demonstrated here, these in vitro binding studies are usually performed with known ligands which have been modified to contain UAA in HLA anchor positions. An example using D-amino acids in relative binding position 1 (P1) of the PADRE peptide is presented. As more HLA binding data become available, new predictive models allowing for the direct estimation of HLA binding for peptides containing UAA can be established.