RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A paradox of lower morbidity and mortality in overweight or obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery has been described; however, knowledge about the influence of obesity in patients with acute Type A aortic dissection (AAD) is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after surgical treatment for AAD. METHODS: Between 01/2004 and 12/2022, 912 patients with a BMI of 18.5 or greater were operated on for AAD. Patients were grouped according to their BMI (normal weight: BMI 18.5-24.9, n = 332; overweight: BMI 25-29.9, n = 367; obesity class I: BMI 30-34.9, n = 133; obesity class II+: BMI ≥ 35, n = 67), and the obtained clinical and surgical data were compared. RESULTS: Obese patients were younger at the time of AAD (p = 0.001) and demonstrated higher rates of typical cardiovascular comorbidities (arterial hypertension, p = 0.005; diabetes mellitus, p < 0.001). The most important preoperative parameters, as well as the surgical approach, were similar between all four groups. The occurrence of renal failure requiring dialysis was higher in patients with BMI ≥ 35 (p = 0.010), but the in-hospital (p = 0.461) and long-term survival (p = 0.894) showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: There are no indications that the obesity paradox is applicable in the setting of AAD. Since obese patients are affected by AAD at a younger age, obesity might constitute a risk factor for AAD. However, obesity does not influence short- or long-term survival. Regardless of body weight, immediate surgical therapy remains the treatment of choice for AAD.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The island technique for reimplantation of supra-aortic vessels in frozen elephant surgery is commonly used but might be questioned for dissected vessels. This study analyses the remodelling of reimplanted supra-aortic vessels after FET in acute and chronic aortic dissection (CAD). METHODS: Between June 2017 and April 2021, 133 patients were operated for acute and CAD using the frozen elephant technique. The island technique for reimplantation of the supra-aortic vessels was used in 94/133 patients. In 68 acute and 21 chronic patients, the total vessel lumen (VL), true lumen, false lumen (FL) and perfused FL area were measured in the innominate, right common carotid and left common carotid artery. Relative luminal changes were compared. RESULTS: In acute aortic dissection, 80% innominate, 40% right carotid and 59% left carotid arteries were dissected preoperatively, but postoperatively FL was only patent in 29%, 12% and 10% (P < 0.001). FL disappearance resulted in >20% total VL reduction in innominate, right carotid and left carotid artery (P < 0.01). In CAD, only 38% innominate, 14% right carotid and 43% left carotid arteries were dissected preoperatively, but postoperatively FL was patent in 19% (ns), 10% (ns) and 5% (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Vascular remodelling is frequently found after the island technique. In acute aortic dissection, the island technique frequently initiates FL disappearance associated with VL decrease. Continuously dissected head vessels show positive remodelling with true lumen increase without VL increase. FL disappearance is frequently found in CAD.