Quantification of endogenous Angiotensin 1-10, 1-9, 1-8, 1-7, and 1-5 in human plasma using micro-UHPLC-MS/MS: Outlining the importance of the pre-analytics for reliable results.

Angiotensin peptides (ANGs) play a central role in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, rendering them interesting biomarkers associated with hypertension. Precise quantification of circulating ANGs holds the potential to assess the activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), a key protease targeted by widely prescribed drugs, namely ACE inhibitors. This ability could pave the way for personalised medicine, offering insights into the prescription of inhibitors targeting either the proteases or the receptors within the system. Despite recent developments in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods for measuring circulating ANG concentrations, comprehensive stability studies of ANGs in human plasma are absent in the literature, raising concerns about the reliability of measured concentrations and their link to clinical conditions. To address this critical gap, we conducted an exhaustive evaluation of the pre-analytical stability of ANG1-10, ANG1-9, ANG1-8, ANG1-7, and ANG1-5. By employing surfactants to mitigate non-specific adsorption and a dedicated mix of protease inhibitors to limit protease activity, we established an MS-based assay for these five peptides. We used this method to quantify circulating concentrations of ANGs in the plasma of 11 healthy donors and 3 patients under kidney dialysis. Our findings revealed that ANG1-10 and ANG1-8 circulate at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 pM in healthy subjects and exhibit a high degree of correlation. Notably, ANG1-9, ANG1-7, and ANG1-5 were undetectable in any of the 14 patients, despite a sub-picomolar limit of detection. This strikingly contrasts with the reference concentrations reported in the literature, which typically fall within the picomolar range. In light of these discrepancies, we strongly advocate for rigorous pre-analytical considerations and comprehensive stability studies to ensure reliable results. We emphasise the pivotal role of heightened pre-analytical awareness within the clinical chemistry community, and we hope for continued growth in this critical area.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography reveals a lower cortical perfusion and a decreased renal flow reserve in hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular structural alteration and dysfunction is a hallmark of arterial hypertension. So far, the visualization and the quantification of renal microcirculation in humans has been hampered by the lack of non-nephrotoxic and non-invasive radiologic techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is an appealing method to investigate renal microcirculation and has not been investigated in this setting. We aimed to compare renal microcirculation in normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) participants using CEUS at rest and during a sympathetic stress test. METHODS: We measured the renal perfusion index (PI, primary outcome), the renal resistive index (RRI), beat-to-beat systemic hemodynamics and plasma catecholamines before and during a 2-min cold pressor test (CPT) in NT and HT participants. Linear mixed model analysis was used to compare the effect of the CPT on the variables of interest. RESULTS: Seventy-three participants (32 HT) with normal kidney function were included. HT participants had a lower baseline PI compared with NT participants [median (interquartile range) 1476 (959-2155) arbitrary units (a.u.) vs 2062 (1438-3318) a.u., P < .001]. The CPT increased blood pressure, heart rate and catecholamines in all participants. The increase in PI observed in NT during the CPT was blunted in HT [+504 (117-920) a.u. vs +1159 (678-2352) a.u in NT, interaction P = .013]. Age, sex and body mass index did not modify these results. CONCLUSIONS: HT patients had a lower basal renal cortical perfusion. During the cold pressor test, HT participants had a smaller increase in the PI, suggesting that renal cortical flow reserve is impaired.

Tutorial review for peptide assays: An ounce of pre-analytics is worth a pound of cure.

The recent increase in peptidomimetic-based medications and the growing interest in peptide hormones has brought new attention to the quantification of peptides for diagnostic purposes. Indeed, the circulating concentrations of peptide hormones in the blood provide a snapshot of the state of the body and could eventually lead to detecting a particular health condition. Although extremely useful, the quantification of such molecules, preferably by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, might be quite tricky. First, peptides are subjected to hydrolysis, oxidation, and other post-translational modifications, and, most importantly, they are substrates of specific and nonspecific proteases in biological matrixes. All these events might continue after sampling, changing the peptide hormone concentrations. Second, because they include positively and negatively charged groups and hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues, they interact with their environment; these interactions might lead to a local change in the measured concentrations. A phenomenon such as nonspecific adsorption to lab glassware or materials has often a tremendous effect on the concentration and needs to be controlled with particular care. Finally, the circulating levels of peptides might be low (pico- or femtomolar range), increasing the impact of the aforementioned effects and inducing the need for highly sensitive instruments and well-optimized methods. Thus, despite the extreme diversity of these peptides and their matrixes, there is a common challenge for all the assays: the need to keep concentrations unchanged from sampling to analysis. While significant efforts are often placed on optimizing the analysis, few studies consider in depth the impact of pre-analytical steps on the results. By working through practical examples, this solution-oriented tutorial review addresses typical pre-analytical challenges encountered during the development of a peptide assay from the standpoint of a clinical laboratory. We provide tips and tricks to avoid pitfalls as well as strategies to guide all new developments. Our ultimate goal is to increase pre-analytical awareness to ensure that newly developed peptide assays produce robust and accurate results.

Proneuropeptide Y and neuropeptide Y metabolites in healthy volunteers and patients with a pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY1-36) is a vasoconstrictor peptide co-secreted with catecholamines by sympathetic nerves, the adrenal medulla, and neoplasms such as pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). It is produced by the intracellular cleavage of proNPY and metabolized into multiple fragments with distinct biological activities. NPY immunoassays for PPGL have a diagnostic sensitivity ranging from 33 to 100%, depending on the antibody used. We have validated a multiplex micro-UHPLC-MS/MS assay for the specific and sensitive quantification of proNPY, NPY1-39, NPY1-37, NPY1-36, NPY2-36, NPY3-36, NPY1-35, NPY3-35, and the C-flanking peptide of NPY (CPON) (collectively termed NPYs), and determined the NPYs reference intervals and concentrations in 32 PPGL patients before, during, and after surgery. Depending on the peptide measured, NPYs were above the upper reference limit (URL) in 20% to 67% of patients, whereas plasma free metanephrine and normetanephrine, the gold standard for PPGL, were above the URL in 40% and 87% of patients, respectively. Age, sex, tachycardia, and tumor localization were not correlated with NPYs. Plasma free metanephrines performed better than NPYs in the detection of PPGL, but NPYs may be a substitute for an early diagnosis of PPGL for patients that suffer from severe kidney impairment or receiving treatments that interfere with catecholamine reuptake.

Suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs: Cross sectional analysis of drug prevalence in the context of the Swiss legislation.

Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs (DUID) is a major field of study to improve road safety. In Switzerland, during controls whether or not they follow an accident, the police can request toxicological analysis targeted either on alcohol only (ALC cases), or on drugs and alcohol (DUID cases). To evaluate both the drugs consumption on the road and whether or not these requests are well correlated with toxicological results, we built a database recording 4003 offenders (3443 males, 550 females) over a two-year period (2018-2019) in Western Switzerland. ALC case samples were then analyzed to target other substances than ethanol. We found one or more psychoactive drugs in 89% of DUID cases and alcohol alone was found in 56% of ALC cases. In ALC cases, alcohol alone was found in 72% of non-accident cases and in 52% of accident cases. This highlights an influence of accident context, inducing a too high suspicion of alcohol after accidents, and therefore an underestimation of the prevalence of other drugs. The most frequently detected drugs in DUID cases were cannabinoids (58%), ethanol (30%), cocaine (21%), benzodiazepines (11%), amphetamines (7%), opiates (6%), and antidepressants (5%). For the ALC cases, the drugs found were ethanol (84%), cannabinoids (13%), benzodiazepines (9%), antidepressants (6%), opiates (5%), cocaine (4%), methadone (3%), and amphetamines (1%). Prescription drugs, such as benzodiazepines, were common in accidents (22%) but rare in non-accidents DUID cases (5%). Thus, these drugs highly impact driving skills while being hard to suspect. This is of first concern as prescription drugs are largely found in poly-drug consumption, especially in combination with alcohol in accident cases. This emphasizes the emerging issue of prescription drugs and should motivate a strategy of prevention focused on the noxious effect of combining alcohol and prescription drugs on driving skills.

Analysis and monitoring of volatile analytes from aqueous solutions by extractions into the gas phase using microdialysis membranes and coupling to fast GC.

Microdialysis membranes (3 mm lengthx200 microm i.d.) have been used to extract volatile analytes from aqueous samples into the gas phase and interfaced with fast gas chromatography. Gas-phase extracts generated from aqueous samples reach steady-state concentrations and are transported to the detector in 5 s. The recovery of the system ranges from 1.28% for toluene to less than 0.1% for ethanol. The lowest detectable concentration without preconcentration was 5 mM for most compounds using a flame ionization detector, and as low as 0.01 mM for more volatile hydrophobic analytes. When interfaced with a fast GC system, changes in aqueous phase concentrations were monitored with a temporal resolution of 10 s.